Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Invitation to ES OPEN 2010 (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:23:02 +0000
Dear friends and contesters, ES OPEN HF Championship 2010 will take place next Saturday, April 17th, from 0500 to 0859 UTC on 40m and 80m! We invite you to participate in this nice small contest. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00103.html (8,152 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 21:51:21 +0000
We might debate for ever what is exactly anyone wants from amateur radio and which trends are making it more attractive and popular and which are dumbing down. But this is Contest reflector and what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00325.html (11,820 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:41:00 +0000
I think you understand that by huge contribution I mean the increased rate and interest for casual ops. That has nothing to do with allowing WRTC ops to use packet. As far as we believe that un-assi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00340.html (12,192 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] R36K mystery solved? (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:10:02 +0000
I tried to find the answer to why R36K had zero skimmer spots from our contest recording. Just once I had their CQ message caught and it was: "R36K ++++TEST--" or similar. Once call sign in the begin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00356.html (12,094 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Is RBN allowed? (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <Tonno.Vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:57:41 +0000
In the light of recent skimmer debate I want to arrange a short poll to understand how entrants interpret the current CQWW rules (http://www.cqww.com/CQWW-Rules-2010.pdf) The question is: In your int
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00165.html (10,864 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] ES OPEN logs due by May 20th (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:35:14 +0300
A reminder to those who made some QSOs in ES Open HF Championship on April 16th. Log submission deadline is on May 20th. We really appreciate your log. 140 participants have submitted their logs for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-05/msg00080.html (8,562 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:09:17 +0300
What are you trying to say Danny? You are calling me names after you were exposed with cluster cheating in CQWW and you cheated in Low Power category running KW or more? I have never tried to hide th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00031.html (11,961 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES! (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:38:14 +0200
I wanted to express similar opinion like Igor. I am violating no law not giving out call in every QSO and in my opinion giving out call blindly in every QSO is bad operating practice. When there are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00121.html (13,357 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers, plain and simple. (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:41:52 +0300
We at ES9C use ENN and T and N. And I very much appreciate others doing the same. ENN just plain saves time and causes no problem. And time is an essence when operating with 4-5 interlocked stations
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00001.html (9,103 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:17:35 +0300
Split operation in CW contest is a very useful tool. Every DX being covered by pile up should use split (of course in a sensible way). It should be encouraged to full extent. Complaining about using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00305.html (10,850 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:12:54 +0300
I am a bit amazed on the how the main advantage of split operation is being neglected here. It is NOT for the DX to be able to manage his huge pile up better. This can surely be done simplex (like K4
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00369.html (15,994 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] 15m monster finally up (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:47:38 +0300
I am happy to inform all friends that a project of last 4-5 years was completed during the last weekend at ES5TV KO38CS central ES QTH and a double H frame on 15m was finally erected what is probably
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-09/msg00231.html (9,320 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] band plan definition - LSB vs USB (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:22:23 +0300
There is one thing has been bothering me for a while and I am sure there are some knowledgable people here who can explain this. * - Lowest dial setting for LSB Voice mode: 1843, 3603 and 7053 kHz* B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00040.html (7,845 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu