Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W0AH@aol.com: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Missed Stew Perry, my favorite contest (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 12:15:28 EST
I was in northern NY and had hoped to set up a few miles away in Quebec for the contest, but health problems (not weather, as I had feared- there was no snow at all) made that impossible. Hope everyo
/archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00027.html (6,479 bytes)

2. Topband: QRSS on 160m (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 05:50:31 -0500
I have been using ARGO for QRSS receive and ON7YD's QRS317 for transmit the past few weeks. I am able to run QRSS on 160M next week if anyone wants to. Right now, I have my LOWfer "CO" beacon on abou
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00067.html (8,130 bytes)

3. Topband: QRSS on 160m (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:21:58 EST
tod@k0to.us writes: << If QRSS is 'experimental' rather than simply very slow CW, the logical place for it to operate is at the top of the band. >> Hi Todd, QRSS is, without question, very slow CW. I
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00079.html (8,061 bytes)

4. Topband: QRSS on 160m (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 05:49:30 -0500
<< ..and what should those criteria be Doug? >> Tom, I posted two days ago that <> The criteria, IMO, should be 1) the avoidance of unnecessary interference to stations who are following the ARRL (an
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00086.html (9,837 bytes)

5. Topband: propagation (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 21:32:07 EST
Hi Stan, Meteor scatter is mostly a function of geometry: the geometry of the wave length and the size (length) of the ionized path caused by the meteor burning up in the atmosphere. Even more import
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00105.html (7,809 bytes)

6. Topband: Why is FM5GU loud? (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:02:38 EST
Not only was he loud, but he can hear! I called many of the Carribean stations this weekend, but worked only one with my 5 watts. FM5GU came right back to me. I also worked HC8N, but that was a strug
/archives//html/Topband/2002-11/msg00158.html (6,400 bytes)

7. Topband: W0AH QRPp Part 2: about 3/4 milliwatt on 1817.5 (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:08:19 EDT
Topbanders: Over 30 stations reported copying the 15 mw W0AH/B to a quarter wave vertical the nights of September 18-22 before it went QRT. Part two of the experiment is a much greater challenge. The
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00025.html (8,593 bytes)

8. Topband: W0AH: Good Ear's Award to N5RG and W7LR (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:02:21 EDT
Topbanders: This morning at 1203 UTC, N5RG, near Dallas, TX, answered my CQ. I was running about 3/4 mw ERP. We exchanged 349 and 599 reports. At 1235 UTC W7LR near Boozeman, MT,answered my CQ. We ex
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00028.html (6,880 bytes)

9. Topband: W0AH 750 micowatts experiment tonight/tomorrow morning on 1.818 (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 16:45:48 EDT
Topbanders: If your area is like mine, the FB 160M conditions of several weeks ago have vanished. While we're waiting for good conditions to return, I'll run my QRPp rig again tonight and tomorrow mo
/archives//html/Topband/2002-10/msg00092.html (8,746 bytes)

10. Topband: Temporary W0AH/B on 1802.2 now (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 23:20:37 EDT
Tonight I'm running a 2N2222 oscillator at 15 milliwatts to my 100' shunt fed, top loaded vertical and would appreciate reports. I will make a better tank circuit tomorrow and maybe get up to 40 or 5
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00139.html (6,980 bytes)

11. Topband: W0AH/B 1802.2 15 mw beacon copied at 700 miles! (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:08:56 EDT
Topbanders, I have received one report and one complaint. Richard, K5NA, near Austin, TX reported my 15 mw 1802.2 beacon peaking 379 in QSB, but had no copy later at his sunrise. Thanks Richard. I al
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00141.html (7,655 bytes)

12. Topband: W0AH 15 mw 1803.1 beacon heard last night (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 22:51:40 EDT
Topbanders, I wound a coil today for the 160M 2N2222 oscillator and am using it instead of the fixed inductor and MFJ Portable Tuner. No more chirp, but the frequency has now moved up to about 1803.1
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00143.html (7,784 bytes)

13. Topband: W0AH 15 mw beacon copied in 5 states last night (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:02:16 EDT
Topbanders: N5UL, NM, reported copy last night at 0306 and earlier, peaking 349 at 0306; K0RW, CO, reported copy last night and this morning peaking S2; W7LR, MT, reported copy of 539 at 1155; W6BH,
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00147.html (7,596 bytes)

14. Topband: W0AH 15 mw beacon heard coast to coast last night (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 09:23:18 EDT
Topbanders: Conditions apparently were pretty good last night and QRN was down a bit. Three stations in California reported reception: W6OAR, W6AJJ, and N6FF. The furtherest reception to the east was
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00151.html (7,216 bytes)

15. Topband: W0AH/B QRT....Summary (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:50:33 EDT
Topbanders: I received 27 reports from 15 states, coast to coast of stations, receiving the 15mw beacon in the 5 nights it was on. Most had Q5 copy at times. Many emailed me more than once. K8BHZ sum
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00157.html (8,251 bytes)

16. Topband: 160m conditions - before and after solar peak (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:11:52 EDT
Topbanders, Here in central Colorado, we had more thunderstorms and lightning (and QRN) the first three weeks of September than during all of July and August. However, it's been a lot quieter recentl
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00186.html (8,048 bytes)

17. Topband: H8 is not SA! Continued good path to EU. (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 11:09:19 EDT
Yep, I goofed! I woke up during the night thinking, H8 is not HC8- is not SA. Several Europeans copied every night this week. DF2PY and EA3JE were the strongest last night. This morning worked Mike,
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00188.html (6,546 bytes)

18. Topband: Extraordinary condx. on 29th Sept. (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:09:13 EDT
Topbanders, Yes, indeed, this season is starting out much better than a year ago. A dozen or more Europeans were copied through the QRN last night, and two even came back to my 150 watts- CT1FJK and
/archives//html/Topband/2002-09/msg00216.html (6,799 bytes)

19. Topband: T32EQ on 160M around 0500 UTC (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 23:13:54 EDT
Talked to him a few minutes ago on 21.255 MHz. He'll be around 1823-1825 with a dipole. Doug W0AH
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00021.html (6,261 bytes)

20. Topband: t32 (score: 1)
Author: W0AH@aol.com (W0AH@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 18:48:12 EDT
Bob, You certainly do here well. I suspect this morning was an anomaly and that you'll work him very soon. From my discussion with T32EQ on a higher band, he is using 100 watts to a dipole. I forgot
/archives//html/Topband/2001-10/msg00039.html (6,983 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu