Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W0eea@aol.com: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] re: Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 00:41:27 2003
General Rules for ARRL Contests on Bands Above 50 MHz 2.3.5.All Rovers are encouraged to adopt operating practices that allow as many stations as possible to contact them. 73, Jim w0eea@aol.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00237.html (7,539 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] re: captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 08:36:05 2003
You write a new rule based upon an arbitrary percentage of the contacts in the rover's log that can be made with any one station. To me that is 49%. If half or more of the contacts in a rover's log
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00243.html (9,598 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Rover Squared (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 21:13:19 2003
Hello All, The term is 'rover squared.' In practice two rovers work each other on all their common bands from and to each of the grids at a four corners location. If they then drive to another four c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00290.html (7,568 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Re: Captive Rover in Indiana (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jul 30 18:45:12 2003
Hi Dan, One of the problems with captive rovers is that you often don't know they are there. Without seeing the logs you can't tell, after all the reason they are a problem is that you don't get to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00319.html (7,403 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Strategy (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:17 2003
I used to be on the crew for a m/m group that fielded stations in the June and September VHF contests. We used to regularly come in second to fifth in that class. We almost always worked more grids
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00341.html (7,587 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Virus possibility---- Read me first. (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:26 2003
Your mail to 'Contest' with the subject Congratulations Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. I sent no mail to the Contesting reflector in the last week. "Congratulation
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01185.html (6,855 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] W0EEA Plans (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:32 2003
W?EEA w0eea@aol.com 14 miles East of Kiowa, Colorado N39-18 W104-12 DM79vh For the January VHF Sweepstakes we will be on as an unlimited multi-operator station. Five operators. 6 Meters thru 24 GHz p
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01868.html (6,528 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] June W0EEA VHF Contest Log (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com (W0eea@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:56 2003
Hi, I just loaded the W0EEA log from the VHF QSO party to <A HREF="www.eQSL.cc">www.eQSL.cc</A> Anyone we worked can pick up a printer ready QSL there. Thanks to all of you (especially the rovers on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02130.html (6,629 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF+ contest proposals: input invited (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:30:23 EST
To VHF+ contesters and the ARRL VHF Contesting Committee: While your basic goals are desirable, your recommended methods of achieving them are mostly counter to both the stated goals and the intent o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00080.html (14,061 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers again (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:29:18 EST
A circle rover does un-natural things that involve mostly working the other rovers in tow. They might bother working a few other stations, but mostly it is more trouble than it is worth. I take it yo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00143.html (7,845 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rovers again (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:28:37 EST
Sure - if you are trying to compete against the other rovers you are dancing with. It seems strange that you are competiting against people that you have made these kinds of arrangements with. It wou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00147.html (9,840 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] Re: Interesting comments from W3ZZ on proposed rule changes. (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 13:36:19 EST
I wish I had access to all the comments filed by everyone in response to the ARRL's request. I don't, but I have been able to find replies from 91 hams so far in the areas of the net I can access. Mo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00039.html (11,940 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] June Contest Rules Posted Today (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:59:22 EST
The June ARRL VHF Contest rules were posted on the ARRL's website this morning. No major changes from last year... _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00058.html (6,290 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] June ARRL VHF Grid Records (score: 1)
Author: W0eea@aol.com
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:47:48 EST
Single Ops-- 6M KA0NNO-270-87 KC4PX-263-03 N5HHS-262-00 K5AM-260-00 K5AM-260-03 NW5E-260-03 2M N4AR-99-85 N3EAX-84-86 N4DT-83-89 K5UR-81-87 W8ULC-80-85 222MHZ K1TEO-44-04 KE8FD-42-96 KE8FD-41-00 KE8F
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00003.html (7,196 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu