Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W2RU@frontiernet.net: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:34:36 -0000
I, too, was going to stay out of this one, but I have to reply. I'm a degreed engineer with substantial industrial electronic equipment design and manufacturing experience, and the comments I'm seei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00434.html (11,981 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:34:36 -0000
I, too, was going to stay out of this one, but I have to reply. I'm a degreed engineer with substantial industrial electronic equipment design and manufacturing experience, and the comments I'm seei
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01023.html (11,981 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mid Atlantic QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 00:54:34 +0000
A "non sequitur", perhaps? Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00064.html (7,375 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia (score: 1)
Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:53:24 -0000
Joe -- What part of North America is KH6 in? Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00423.html (8,206 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:26:58 -0000
was "states". Why were States the "obvious" multiplier when the long-stated intent was to replace a very popular contest that used ARRL Sections as multipliers? Why is that germane to a discussion of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00040.html (11,141 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WWSA This weekend!! (score: 1)
Author: "W2RU - Bud Hippisley" <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:50:58 -0000
I can't find it explicitly stated that a station can be contacted once per (CW) band. Is that true? Also -- no 160, apparently. Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00099.html (7,826 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Re: Sprint rules (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:58:32 +0000
And just think how much better it would be to have ARRL Sections for the USA multipliers.... Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00191.html (7,313 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Sprint Multipliers (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:38:23 +0000
I thought I had read at one time that the Sprints were intended to help build contesting skills. Copying a non-obvious exchange (such as a person's name) was specifically cited as good training for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00207.html (9,198 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB filters for Kenwood TS-940 (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:17:35 +0000
Rick -- I can't think of any reason to put a WIDER filter in the LOWER (455) IF. In your scenario, the signals coming out of the high IF are going to be bandwidth limited by the 2.1 kHz 8.8 MHz filte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00296.html (9,563 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] How about ditching ARRL DX top 10 completely? (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 21:00:26 +0000
A M E N !!! Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00216.html (9,066 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] SS format (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:21:22 +0000
Perfect, perhaps, for those few operators who have landed at great stations in rare sections. The rest of us use the "Sunday doldrums" to (at least partially) catch up. (Think "tortoise and hare".) W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00644.html (11,604 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:50:22 +0000
And "anything goes" for antenna size on 40 meters??? I kinda like 27 meters, myself -- that being the height of *my* tallest tower, of course... Bud, W2RU ____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00813.html (9,670 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] RE: Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 02:02:59 +0000
Right on, Hans..... For all the dialog on this reflector about boosting contest awareness and participation by the "newbies" and "little guys", I'm surprised this is the first reference to one of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00051.html (9,438 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] Re: Contest Metrics (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 14:48:59 +0000
Some of the old-timers on here may recall that decades ago, when I (K2KIR then) was a teenager, W2FEB was my in-section "barometer" for domestic contests. My Heathkit DX-40 and "newbie" operating ski
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00075.html (9,148 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Re: Line Scores (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 02:55:35 +0000
While this approach might appeal to some of us hard core contesters, I don't see how this addresses the issue I originally raised, which was one of exposing certain groups -- non-contesters, people w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00147.html (10,492 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:06:34 +0000
Back in the "dark ages", when I was in college, we had a station (W1MX) with only a single exciter and a single receiver. But we sometimes had more than one person who wanted to operate in a given co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00117.html (9,185 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Kenwood YK-88C-1 vs Inrad 103 (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:00:29 +0000
But George _will_ make them if enough of us commit to buying the first run. Seems to me he needed a minimum order of 10 per filter BW/IF when I last asked him. If I got one for the high IF I'd want a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00342.html (8,392 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Alumni contesters (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:14:22 +0000
W6NL was a member of W1MX while getting his master's degree when I was a freshman. Bud, W2RU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00663.html (7,099 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL 160 and DX Window (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 00:48:40 +0000
Gee, I thought honoring of the DX window was _better_ than in past years. Yes, there were violators, but seemed to me like fewer than I've heard previously. I tried to do my part by skipping W/VE sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00097.html (7,987 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] 48 hours and health (score: 1)
Author: W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:35 +0000
I would expect ANYone who was in the head for 25 years would have hemorrhoids.... :-) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00177.html (7,482 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu