Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4EF@ca.rr.com: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun for G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:56:19 -0800
FWIW, #14 AWG Solid THHN is running $42 per 500' roll at the Home Depots in Southern California. 73, Mike W4EF............. _______________________________________________ ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00020.html (9,421 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun for G5RV (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:03:24 -0800
It may depend on whether or not your "from" email address matches the email address which you are subscribed under. I notice that when I send emails to Towertalk from my non-subscribed email address,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00057.html (9,234 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Climbing Glen Martin M-18 Tower (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 12:47:26 -0700
I was given 40ft of Glen Martin M-18 Aluminum Tower a few years ago along with the accompanying Hazer tram system. I am thinking of actually putting it up this summer. In theory with the Hazer, I sho
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-04/msg00100.html (7,536 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 00:31:00 -0700
Whether it will take the SWR to 1:1 is a function of the step size in the tuner design (if it's a switched L and C) and the control algorithm. Most autotuners stop when the SWR is below, say, 1.3:1 o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00419.html (12,088 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 00:26:17 -0800
Except for mention on W8JI's website, I haven't seen much mention of "bust open" anchors as an option for amateur tower guying: http://www.w8ji.com/screw_in_guy_anchors.htm I'd be curious to know if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00144.html (9,882 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:28:57 -0800
Thanks, Jim: Both AB Chance-Hubbell and MacLean Power Systems sell them for utility applications: http://www.hubbellpowersystems.com/anchoring/expanding/ http://www.macleanpower.com/products/item.asp
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00148.html (10,744 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 13:28:26 -0800
Jim, I am not sure I agree with your statement, at least not in the case of standalone auto tuner. While I am not familiar with ins and outs of practical auto tuner design, I do presume they use a 5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00291.html (11,448 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:33:51 -0800
On 12/14/2013 2:24 PM, Jim Lux wrote: No, they use some sort of transformer SWR bridge, with diode detectors (and some use a phase detector too(SGC), to know which direction to tune). It's not a dire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00295.html (14,925 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:50:27 -0800
On 12/15/2013 5:40 PM, Hans Hammarquist wrote: --Original Message-- From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Sun, Dec 15, 2013 7:41 pm Subject: Re: [TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00311.html (11,448 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: RG-149: 50 ohm/70 ohm - does it matter? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:55:40 -0800
On 12/15/2013 9:05 PM, Jim Lux wrote: <SCENARIO 1> I think the real question is whether a such a hybrid/coupler/line sampler would have a characteristic impedance? That is, if I have a 75 ohm source
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00313.html (15,606 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Raising Towers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:16:28 -0800
I was pointing a few possible problems to show to others what can happen or give another possibility to do not put in risk life or property but what was the response? supportive? destructive? Indeed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00482.html (10,587 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Raising Towers (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 19:09:42 -0800
Jim, I had somewhat the same feeling until I scrolled down to the "selfie" of the guy taken from the top of one of those homebrew 200' towers made from chain-link fence top-rail. You can clearly see
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00487.html (12,609 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] 75 or 70 Ohm twinlead or ladderline cable - does it exist? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:32:25 -0700
Google search did not come up with anything but maybe I'm overlooking something Tnx BIll AA7XT Spiderbeam uses insulated Wireman CQ-532 PE insulated multistrand copper coated steel for their elements
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-03/msg00228.html (10,124 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] KT36 Balun (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:01:03 -0700
We had the same experience with the 4:1 baluns on the KT34XA and 40M4 at W6UE. Something on order of twenty years of service with no problems (with the baluns anyway- 40M4 is another story). I should
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00597.html (11,100 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: In Shack Tuner Vs. Remote Tuner for Multi-Band Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 05:27:39 -0700
Here you go, Chuck: http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/Remote_Tuners.htm http://hbag.ch/en/produkte/item/anpassnetzwerk BTW, the thing about the fan dipole that I am not sure anyone mentioned is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00120.html (12,769 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] UV resistant wire ties (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 09:57:15 -0700
With regard to the big box stores, I'll second that, John. The last bag I bought from Home Depot was crap. A large percentage of the ties in that bag were so poor that all you had to do was flex them
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00515.html (9,069 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] SRTM Fill Data (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 16:39:04 -0700
Paul, This document has a pretty good explanation of how the non-SRTM data was blended to fill in voids: https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/public/measures/docs/NASA_SRTM_V3.pdf Looks like t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00261.html (10,397 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Long pole / simple, tall construction for small antenna (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:53:56 -0700
On 10/26/2014 10:25 AM, Jim Lux wrote: On 10/26/14, 8:53 AM, Vegard Svanberg wrote: .........Apart from the pole itself, an issue is also proper anchoring in the ground (rocky ground is easy, obvious
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00377.html (10,070 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Shorty Forty Hose Clamp thread (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 08:21:18 -0700
Stan, A couple of questions: 1) Does the counterbore go all the way through the one wall of the outer diameter piece? 2) Is the clearance between the counterbore diameter and the cap screw head diame
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00259.html (10,770 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] VNA Antenna Analyzer (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 05:21:28 -0700
Wayne, you might check with Array Solutions. They list the following accessories in the price list under the AIM-4300 Analyzer: AS-PLS-U Standard Calibration load set PL259 up to 1 GHz $50.00 AS-PLS-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00325.html (8,716 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu