Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W8IK@ibm.net: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [Log checking UNSTABLE senders in SS (score: 1)
Author: W8IK@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK/4)
Date: Sun Mar 7 18:38:59 1999
Do that *AND* include that deduction in calculating DQ. Perhaps it will serve as a warning to those who are sloppy with their exchange, refuse to slow down/repeat for the other station to confirm, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00089.html (7,564 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] RE: [Yaesu] Re: FT-920 advice- Thanks (score: 1)
Author: W8IK@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK/4)
Date: Fri Mar 19 08:40:43 1999
Two excellent sites concerning the recent Yaesu radios: WM7D's FT920 site: http://www.wm7d.net/hamradio/920/ W8RD's FT-847 site: http://www.en.com/users/rayd/ft-847/ 73, ... Joe Subich, W8IK/4 ex-AD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00278.html (6,925 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Re:WPX results vs. SM2EKM claims (score: 1)
Author: W8IK@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK/4)
Date: Tue Mar 30 10:53:02 1999
How about eliminating the country differential? Simply 1 point (or 2 points, take your pick) for QSOs within one's own continent and 3 points (or 5 points, again pick-em) for QSOs with another conti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00372.html (8,349 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK)
Date: Sun Aug 15 10:37:22 1999
I hate to sound like I'm picking on the log checker, but this stand on "cut numbers" is dead wrong. In case anyone has forgotten, all contest exchanges started out as "message copying" exercises. Any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00118.html (10,808 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK)
Date: Sun Aug 15 10:37:22 1999
I hate to sound like I'm picking on the log checker, but this stand on "cut numbers" is dead wrong. In case anyone has forgotten, all contest exchanges started out as "message copying" exercises. Any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00379.html (10,913 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] SO vs. SOA and 1 radio vs. 2 radio (score: 1)
Author: w8ik@ibm.net (Joe Subich, W8IK)
Date: Sat Nov 1 10:58:48 1997
I agree with many of your arguments for a distinction between 1-radio and 2-radio distinction in results (just as there should be an indication SO vs. SOA). However, how do you handle the FT-1000D, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00008.html (7,294 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu