Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Wt8r@aol.com: 130 ]

Total 130 documents matching your query.

61. [AMPS] Switches (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:35:37 EDT
Well Tom, instead of making inflammatory personal attacks, why don't you tell us the answer? This really isn't the scientific and professional approach that one would expect of a person in your posit
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00240.html (9,226 bytes)

62. [AMPS] Switches (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:17:56 EDT
I guess I was unaware that the purpose of this reflector was to help Tom design amplifiers for Ameritron in order to make a living. Gee, I didn't realize that Tom needed help from hearing him talk ab
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00282.html (10,521 bytes)

63. [AMPS] Switches (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 14:01:59 EDT
Apparently you missed my point completely: care I agree with that. I don't have a problem with that. As you say, that is the point of the reflector. To: <amps@contesting.com> some Is Tom saying that
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00308.html (12,884 bytes)

64. [AMPS] AMERITRON AL80A (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2000 23:51:04 EDT
-- -- Jorge, A friend of mine owned an AL-80A. He told me that the inductance in both the anode RF Choke and the filament choke were insufficient. He rewound both of these adding turns in each instan
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00354.html (9,308 bytes)

65. [AMPS] AMERITRON AL80A (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 09:18:23 EDT
both Well, I see it is time for Tom to blow smoke and duck the issues AGAIN claiming that no one else (besides himself) knows anything. First of all, apparently Tom's comprehension of the English lan
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00375.html (10,783 bytes)

66. [AMPS] Commercial amp design on AMPS (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 17:52:54 EDT
that original -- Personally I don't give a hang whether Tom uses the Amps reflector to HELP him design amplifiers or not. What I have a problem with is the high handed manner with which we are told t
/archives//html/Amps/2000-10/msg00402.html (10,704 bytes)

67. [AMPS] HV Switch (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 07:37:22 EDT
multitech@sprynet.com (Skip Coleman) Dave, WT8R -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00197.html (6,770 bytes)

68. [AMPS] TL-922 (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 22:33:03 EDT
Tom, WOW....! This is real Rocket Science..........replacing defective components to repair something. How many Physics degrees do you have to have in order to be able to this? Strange that you would
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00255.html (8,799 bytes)

69. [AMPS] SELL:8877 RF Deck Components (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 21:41:27 EDT
Tom, Don't do as I do, do as I say. I see that the postings are back in the "mud" again. I thought you wanted to restart the technical talk again. Dave, WT8R -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00334.html (7,989 bytes)

70. [AMPS] Parasitic Oscillation Repeatability (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 23:25:47 EDT
more And, It depends on what your definition of "is" is........ My reading of the post referred to here is that the "initiation of the parasitic is repeatable" (that it can be modeled), not that it w
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00431.html (8,272 bytes)

71. [AMPS] Grid protection (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:52:11 EDT
Is this really necessary? I thought Tom wanted a kinder, more gentle world. Isn't Tom the one who said that we must stop the politics of personal destruction? Tom is always on the band wagon about ch
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00544.html (8,235 bytes)

72. [AMPS] Fair is fair (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 13:58:57 EDT
Tom, You are absolutely wrong. I was the person who explained to you and your minion John Ogden that the energy which powers parasitic oscillations comes from the transmitter power supply. The initia
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00551.html (7,838 bytes)

73. [AMPS] Fair is fair (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:45:30 EDT
As you said to me Tom, do you own the list? Who are you to tell me what to do? Dave, WT8R -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: a
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00608.html (8,286 bytes)

74. [AMPS] 4CX5000 Filament Voltage/Current? (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 14:22:44 EDT
Eimac says 7.5 V @ 75 Amps for 4CX5000A/8170 4CX5000J/8909 7.5VAC@ 103Amps 4CX5000R/8170W 7.5VAC@ 75Amps 73 de Dave, WT8R -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contestin
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg00807.html (7,006 bytes)

75. [AMPS] Kaput 8877 #2 (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 11:53:59 EDT
My thoughts exactly. Maybe someone has ESP of which we are unaware. Dave, WT8R -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg01044.html (7,579 bytes)

76. [AMPS] AL-80B Amps (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:52:21 EDT
You mean that memorizing the answers to a few questions and regurgitating them at an infinite number of testing sessions doesn't qualify one to work on amplifiers that contain lethal high voltages? M
/archives//html/Amps/2000-09/msg01093.html (8,595 bytes)

77. [AMPS] Come Clean (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 08:45:57 EDT
is Fred, Thank you for putting into words the thoughts of many (I am sure) on this list. I detest people who appear to speak with authority but provide no data or facts with which to back up what the
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00338.html (7,976 bytes)

78. [AMPS] Toll Free (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2000 17:42:11 EDT
has Yes, this is the prevailing attitude today: I don't care what anybody else thinks, but boy, they had better worry about what I think. Apparently Martin doesn't read this list very often if he thi
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00359.html (8,486 bytes)

79. [AMPS] (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 17:49:52 EDT
for Ron, I would recommend digital stepper motors. Cheap in surplus stores. Plenty of torque. Easily Reversible. Speed is determined by the rate of stepping pulses fed to motor and all steppers have
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00463.html (8,432 bytes)

80. [AMPS] 811H's on CB (score: 1)
Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 16:37:21 EDT
Well, design the amplifier so it isn't so easy to modify for 10/11 meter operation. Simple enough fix. The "green wire" modification was so simple that most CBers that wanna run high power can figure
/archives//html/Amps/2000-08/msg00498.html (14,974 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu