Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa0cy@QUADNET.NET: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] CQWW CABRILLO QUESTIONS (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:35:31 -0400
WF1B doesn't generate a Cabrillo file for this contest. I have the WT4I conversion program but have not yet tried it. (I have Writelog too, but have not tried that either.) Is there a web site that s
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-09/msg00188.html (6,660 bytes)

2. RE: [RTTY] CQWW RTTY - Right Country Wrong Zone (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:07:16 -0400
If the SD station was K7RE, he WAS sending zone 3. I had a discussion with him after exchanging the necessary information so hopefully he made the correction in future QSOs. --Original Message-- From
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00018.html (8,952 bytes)

3. [RTTY] JARTS Log Submittal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:36:05 -0400
I fail to see the validation for the rants concerning submitting the log. Their web site was quite clear on the composition of the file. I followed the format precisely, including case etc., and had
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00246.html (6,707 bytes)

4. RE: [RTTY] JARTS, not sending log (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:47:27 -0400
Well, Vince, I use WF1B so Cabrillo support is minimal. I made around 50 Q's in JARTS, but I still spent the few minutes necessary to generate the log in the requested format using the WT4I Cabrillo
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-10/msg00247.html (9,062 bytes)

5. RE: [RTTY] Tara Melee amd Major Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 21:00:42 -0500
If possible, take off the Monday following a major contest too. This way you hopefully won't be hearing voices, CW, and/or RTTY tones in your head. If I had to choose between taking off the Friday or
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00034.html (9,554 bytes)

6. [RTTY] FW: Will Your Safety Harness Kill You? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:31:39 -0500
Will Your Safety Harness Kill You?Since many readers climb towers. Can someone cross-post to towertalk and other appropriate reflectors? There's a very important article related to climbing safety sy
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00241.html (7,463 bytes)

7. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:05:53 -0500
I'm probably doing something incorrectly, but the last time I tried to get the contest results from the Web, I could only get them by category. Granted I'm usually interested in how I did relative to
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00280.html (10,125 bytes)

8. [RTTY] WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:14:12 -0400
My circa-1988 PK-232 got zapped. Anybody have a PK-232 to sell? I'd prefer a later version that works with AEA's Windows-based software, but the earlier DOS version will do fine. Yes, I'm aware of it
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00181.html (6,366 bytes)

9. [RTTY] PK232 Question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:57:46 -0400
I've a PK232MBX that seems to be "stuck" in wordout being on, even though it (dumb terminal mode) claims that the parameter is turned off; and I've set it to off in the dumb terminal. I tried turning
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00107.html (6,571 bytes)

10. [RTTY] PK232 Wordout Problem Revisited (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 10:05:55 -0400
PK232 & RTTY Experts: Thanks for the suggestions. Based on the replies, I think the problem may have been misunderstood or misinterpreted. I took some copious notes while testing last night. Maybe th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00130.html (8,998 bytes)

11. [RTTY] PK232 Wordout Problem Revisited (hopefully w/o the Rich TextAttachment) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:12:54 -0400
PK232 & RTTY Experts: Thanks for the suggestions. Based on the replies, I think the problem may have been misunderstood or misinterpreted. I took some copious notes while testing last night. Maybe th
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00142.html (9,247 bytes)

12. [RTTY] CQWW ROBOT REJECTS A CABRILLO LOG AS NOT BEING A CABRILLOLOG! (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:32:31 -0400
I can understand the semantics regarding classification and the need to correct. That has happened to me and I just change it to what the robot requests. But the CQWW RTTY robot is rejecting my Cabri
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00330.html (6,984 bytes)

13. [RTTY] AA0CY Cabrillo Log Is Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:55:09 -0400
I sent my log to Glenn W6OTC and he posted it without any problem. I have no idea of why the robot refused to accept my log. Oh, well. 73, Bob AA0CY PS Can anyone explain to me the logic of sending 5
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00360.html (6,468 bytes)

14. RE: [RTTY] AA0CY Cabrillo Log Is Posted (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 08:37:11 -0400
What awards are you referring to? No requirement for exchanging signal reports are mentioned in the ARRL DXCC criteria. Section I Part 4 says that that confirmation data (QSL I assume) must include t
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00049.html (8,282 bytes)

15. SENDING 5NN IN RTTY CONTESTS (was RE: [RTTY] AA0CY Cabrillo Log IsPosted) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 20:40:48 -0400
That this op was a CW op was what I figured too; I am 97% CW, 2% RTTY (contests), and 1% SSB (contests). I have seen the 5NN on RTTY before, but I don't know if it was the same callsign. Maybe this p
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00064.html (9,155 bytes)

16. [RTTY] WA9ALS's RECENT NCJ ARTICLE (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:59:01 -0500
Very interesting article. Was hoping ALS could expand on it--to wit, what software? I assume something that could use soundcard (e.g. Writelog) as no mention of a hardware TNC was mentioned. Perhaps
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-11/msg00143.html (6,484 bytes)

17. RE: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:59:08 -0500
I think the 31Jan thingie happened because people complained that the mid-February date conflicted with Valentine's Day. 73, Bob AA0CY --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:r
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00132.html (9,643 bytes)

18. [RTTY] WPX Robot ? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:48:50 -0500
Is there a robot acknowledging log receipts? I submitted my log last night and have had no response -- neither an acknowledgement nor a "bounce" notice. Thanks & 73, Bob AA0CY _______________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00241.html (6,715 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Updated AA5AU RTTY Contest Notes - XE and WPX contests (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:15:54 -0500
Regarding lowering the RF Gain for best RTTY reception: Gee, back in the early 1960's it was suggested by the ARRL to lower the RF Gain and "ride" the AF Gain for best CW reception. Don't know about
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00301.html (11,258 bytes)

20. [RTTY] RTTY Sprint -- 3 QSO Rule Question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:48:59 -0500
Does the 3-QSO Rule apply only to the calling station (who knows it has been at least 3 QSOs) or to both the calling station and the station being called (who may or may not have completed the requir
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00072.html (6,419 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu