Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 374 ]

Total 374 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR shifts with power (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:11:16 -0500
Yes and no. Originally, yes, but I've gone and switched out to an air variable as an experiment, and the problem remains. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00493.html (8,461 bytes)

282. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR shifts with power (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:20:23 -0500
No. Yup. OK. I've considered this possibility, even to the point of possibly winding a new coil just for 80m. I'm seeing about 200 pf on 80m on the shunt, and around 600 pf on 160m. What value series
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00496.html (10,354 bytes)

283. Re: [TowerTalk] double bazooka vs full length dipole??? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:06:04 -0500
The "broadbandedness" of the double bazooka probably comes more from the additional loss of the coax than from any increase in the size of the conductor. If you consider the size of 12 gauge wire or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00595.html (8,238 bytes)

284. Re: [TowerTalk] Broadbanding a dipole (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:41:13 -0500
Yup, this will make the dipole more broadbanded, because it simulates a single element of the same diameter. No, with multiple wires there isn't an added loss. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00634.html (8,867 bytes)

285. Re: [TowerTalk] Blocking a Crankup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:12:20 -0500
The BEST way is to use a ladder or bucket truck, so you don't have to climb it at all. Even blocked, a crankup tower is exceedingly dangerous to climb. Best advice is not to climb it at all. Bill Col
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00144.html (7,882 bytes)

286. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:46:37 -0500
While you might be able to get away with lag bolts at the 10 foot level into the rim joist, you are going to need carriage bolts through the header into the brackets. You don't need any section that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00414.html (8,894 bytes)

287. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25G (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:21:53 -0500
How tall a mast are we talking about? How much is going to be in the tower and how much outside? Champion Radio has a mast stress program on their site. You should compute how much mast you need and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00023.html (7,632 bytes)

288. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:50:31 -0500
Last October, I put the similar A743 kit on my A3S. I have not seen this "narrowing" of 20m. The 20m SWR curves are much the same as before. The 40m has a rather narrow SWR bandwidth by itself, but i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00471.html (8,393 bytes)

289. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower bases and concrete. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:48:24 -0500
You don't mix sand into concrete. Concrete is a mix of a filler material, known as an aggregate, and cement. The aggregate is usually a gravel or other rock. Sand helps to fill the spaces between the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00485.html (9,094 bytes)

290. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Location (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:01:37 -0400
Does your rotator break down that often? For what they do, rotators are pretty rugged pieces of equipment. If yours is constantly breaking, perhaps you need to move to a larger rotator? What maintena
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00149.html (7,502 bytes)

291. Re: [TowerTalk] self-supporting rohn 25g?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:11:49 -0400
uh, 2' by 2' by 4' deep. About .7 yard of concrete. Rohn 25 is self-supporting up to a very short height, depending on the wind load. I don't have my catalog handy, but at 70 mph, it's about 30-35 fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00150.html (8,212 bytes)

292. Re: [TowerTalk] Upgrading from Rohn 25 to 45 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 23:26:07 -0400
Doesn't Rohn 45 require a larger tower base than Rohn 25? Isn't the standard Rohn 25 base 2 feet square, whereas Rohn 45 is more like 2.5 feet square? This would seem to be a difficult conversion, un
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00151.html (7,278 bytes)

293. Re: [TowerTalk] W7IX--More Info (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 20:28:09 -0400
Sounds like a crane might have been a better idea. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00282.html (6,987 bytes)

294. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials for a 4 sq system - wire size and mixessizes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:23:45 -0400
Bingo. Don't worry about the wire size too much. So long as the wires are big enough not to break, they should be fine. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00284.html (8,670 bytes)

295. Re: [TowerTalk] RE : SteppIr's are BEAUTIFUL!!!! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 22:27:20 -0400
Considering how many times this scenario has played out and resulted in an airport closure, it is a relief to hear that a judge finally ruled correctly.... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@ar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00285.html (7,599 bytes)

296. Re: [TowerTalk] Rising copper prices lead to rising cable prices (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:01:42 -0400
The copper alloy pennies are about 2.6 grams and ring nicely when dropped (like a bell). The copper-coated zinc pennies are 3.1 grams and land with a dull thunk when dropped. Curiously, you can't tel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00287.html (8,827 bytes)

297. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn Self Support Chart Says....... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:15:34 -0400
My catalog (from 2000, I think), clearly states "As a guyed structure, [Rohn] 25G can rise to a maximum height of 190 feet. Selfsupporting and bracketed heights depend on loading are also specified i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00289.html (9,199 bytes)

298. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIr's suck (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:34:46 -0400
It's actually worse than that, Roger. If a municipality accepts FAA money, then they have to agree to operate the airport for a long period of time (typically 20-25 years). It carries the stipulation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00290.html (9,823 bytes)

299. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 41, Issue 21 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 23:40:34 -0400
According to Rohn, 45G can hold up 5.1 square feet 40 feet high in 70 mph winds. That seems like plenty for a small tribander. (My A3S w/ A743 is 5 square feet) Temporary guys might be a good idea wh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00291.html (8,611 bytes)

300. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIr's (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 22:54:57 -0400
Yeah, but unfortunately Chicago never accepted FAA funds to do improvements to Meigs field. However, Daley did go back on a promise he had made with an Illinois congressman, as well as do the deed in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00357.html (8,969 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu