Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa4lr@arrl.net: 374 ]

Total 374 documents matching your query.

301. Re: [TowerTalk] side-mounting tower to building (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:40:32 -0400
Get a Rohn catalog. It has a diagram for the base of a bracketed tower. The base is 2x2x4 feet. Place 4 feet and a few inches of tower section into the base (about 2-4" should stick out the bottom an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00474.html (8,259 bytes)

302. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 22:17:30 -0400
Uh, this is not correct on many levels. First of all, although Cessna ceased production of piston-powered aircraft in 1986, Piper aircraft continued to produce them. Or, at least they tried. Many oth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00175.html (11,409 bytes)

303. Re: [TowerTalk] Helically wound verticals (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:14:41 -0400
I once made a helically wound vertical for 40m by taking a half-wave of wire and winding it on a 2x4. Matching was accomplished by tapping the first dozen or so turns and using a seriles capacitor. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00183.html (8,669 bytes)

304. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt feed short tower (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:40:52 -0400
I have a similar situation, and have been able to get my shunt-fed tower to work effectively on both 80m and 160m. My tower is 44 feet of Rohn 25, topped with nearly 6 feet of mast to a Cushcraft A3S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00184.html (9,861 bytes)

305. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt feed short tower (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:44:53 -0400
An omega match has limited matching range. If your shunt isn't close to that range, you won't be able to tune it. W8JI has an article about this on his site: http://www.w8ji.com/omega_and_gama_matchi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00185.html (8,169 bytes)

306. Re: [TowerTalk] Action against US Tower? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:56:01 -0400
They do NOW, but they didn't produce them for quite a few years. Cessna did not produce ANY piston-powered aircraft from 1987-1996. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not withi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00186.html (9,669 bytes)

307. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft XM240 & Shunt fed tower (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:57:44 -0400
Perhaps part of the solution is to run less SOUP! ( hi hi ) Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 __________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00224.html (8,791 bytes)

308. Re: [TowerTalk] Tailtwister / Ham4 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 08:26:23 -0400
Yes. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901 _______________________________________________ _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00243.html (6,976 bytes)

309. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:39:23 -0400
1/4 wave radials for 40m are 1/2 wave on 20m. If we're talking about a ground-mounted vertical, certainly the 40m radials will work great for 20m. Just put down a lot of them (strive for 20-40 radial
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00293.html (7,563 bytes)

310. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing belts/harnesses demonstration (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:10:29 -0400
As ouchy as both these might be, it's still better than the big ouch at the bottom of the tower. I ALWAYS do this. I always have a spotter who watches my climb and can call 911 if I do something stup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00296.html (10,091 bytes)

311. Re: [TowerTalk] coax stubs (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 00:14:56 -0400
How broad are these stubs? Wouldn't a 1/4 wave stub tuned for 7.1 MHz only pass 15m at 21.3 MHz? Can they practically pass/reject the whole band? Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00299.html (7,582 bytes)

312. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:45:30 -0400
I don't think that 4 or 5 20 foot radials are going to be a terribly effective groundplane for a 160m vertical.... Even if you bury them. True, the far ends of the wire do less and less "work" of a g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00339.html (8,974 bytes)

313. Re: [TowerTalk] bracketed 45G (Bob Smith NA6T) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:39:07 -0400
HB25A, HB25B and HB25C. These are pretty sturdy brackets, although they all have some lateral "give". They are for 15", 24" and 36", respectively. My house has 17" eaves, plus gutters, so I had to us
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00377.html (8,836 bytes)

314. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:55:30 -0400
Horizontal antennas, like dipoles, make great antennas, but they are affected by proximity to the ground. They have to be at least 1/4 wave above ground before the radiation pattern is anything but s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00378.html (10,509 bytes)

315. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:02:57 -0400
Those figures seem big, but this is less than 1/2 wavelength high. It's like putting a 10m monobander at 15 feet! I've never heard of anyone with a 160m yagi at 500 feet. There's a couple of guys who
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00379.html (9,465 bytes)

316. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:35:33 -0400
Are these radials ground-mounted or elevated? If they are groundmounted, don't try to cut the radials to any particular length for each band. Just put down 24 radials the same length as you would cut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00380.html (9,404 bytes)

317. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:20:40 -0400
To make sure I have my facts straight, I've gone and modeled a 20m long dipole at heights of 10m, 20m and 30m at a frequency of 3.6 MHz (which is darn close to resonance at low heights). At 10m high,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00407.html (11,586 bytes)

318. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 22:40:11 -0400
If you look at the whole pattern, the gain lobe is straight up. It looks like a snow cone. This description should be obvious to anyone who has done any modelling at all. If you want to receive signa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00414.html (10,149 bytes)

319. Re: [TowerTalk] Bonding Tower Sections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:33:46 -0400
Yup. Works great. Noalox is zinc particles in silicone grease, and the tower is plated with zinc. Very compatible. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand year
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00652.html (7,958 bytes)

320. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Cable (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:55:09 -0400
I've used ordinary 4-conductor bell wire with about a 100 foot run to control an AR22. Note that the AR22 doesn't have a brake solenoid, which is the largest current draw in the HAM rotators. You mig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00665.html (7,743 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu