WinWarbler is the digital mode component of the freeware DXLab Suite. Version 7.5.9, released earlier today, includes G3YYD's 2Tone RTTY demodulator, which provides excellent weak signal decoding and
Anyone have copies of HAL Engineering Documents E2001 and E2005 for the DXP38, or know where they can be obtained? 73, Dave, AA6YQ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
I have set up a simple two-question survey to assess your expectations of LotWs availability and processing time. Please visit <http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/M5VWV9V> Thanks! 73, Dave, AA6YQ ________
Results of the survey as of ~21Z today can be found in <http://www.ambersoft.com/Amateur_Radio/TQSL/ExpectationsSurvey_2013-07-08.pdf> The Response Percent and Response Count columns contain raw data
Like Bill, I also have wondered why they don't offer more awards via LoTW. development resources. At the recent ARRL Board of Directors meeting, positive first steps were taken to address this situa
I beleive it only works with n1mm and write log, RTTY decoding, providing simultaneous decoding of the same signal. Selecting a signal in WinWarbler's waterfall or spectrum display directs both engi
Multiple responses based on facts and logic will be more effective than a single response with multiple signatories, and more effective than the same response submitted by multiple ops. Based on your
As has been pointed out to you on multiple occasions, John, the sub-bands in which unattended operation is permitted are not exclusively assigned to unattended operation. When it defined these sub-ba
The FCC did not reject the ARRL's "Regulation by Bandwidth" proposal; the ARRL retracted its proposal before any decision was rendered. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Although this thread is titled "ARRL Symbol rat
Section II.8 of <http://www.arrl.org/files/media/News/Petition%20for%20Rule%20Making%20AS-FILED%2011%2015%202013.pdf> restates the 500 hertz bandwidth limit on automatically controlled stations opera
What's a "scanning auto-responder"? How is it different than an automatically controlled station as described in 97.221? <http://www.w5yi.org/page.php?id=136> 73, Dave, AA6YQ The scanning "auto-respo
Your message is the first I've heard of automatically controlled stations ignoring the 500 hz bandwidth limitation within the sub-bands specified by 97.221. Is this anecdotal, or is there hard eviden
Automatically controlled stations are not remotely-controlled stations, and vice versa; thus section IV would not enable the use of 2800 hertz for automatically controlled stations. My understanding
Remotely controlled stations and automatically controlled stations are separately characterized in 97.109: <http://www.w5yi.org/page.php?id=119> I've not found a strong definition of either remotely
In messaging systems like WinLink, users activate an unattended server. For this to work, users must know on what frequencies to call. See, for example, <http://www.qsl.net/ve3lki/RMS/index.html> Bei
WinMor also includes an effective busy-frequency detector that reduces the likelihood of its servers responding on a frequency that is already in use. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Dave, the link provided mentions
They're wrong. WinLink falls exactly under the description of automatic operation in 97.221: 1. there is no control operator present at the (Winlink server) station 2. The (Winlink server) station is
WinMor's busy frequency detector may not be sensitive to JT65, but it does detect SSB, RTTY, PSK variants, and several other digital modes. 73, Dave, AA6YQ Winmor's busy frequency circuit is not effe
If WinLink is ignoring 97.221, then we have the following argument against the ARRL proposal: 1. automatic stations are routinely operating outside the subbands specified in 97.221 (cite http://www.w
A stronger argument is that no increase in bandwidth should be permitted until the issue of QRM from automatic stations has been resolved. Though WinMor servers include busy frequency detectors, WinL