Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aa8ve@juno.com: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

121. [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77 (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:53:08 -0400
Jason, If your really serious about HF radio this is an easy choice. More features is no substitution for quality radio. The Alinco is just another do-all, look important, Jap. rig with more features
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00651.html (10,025 bytes)

122. [TenTec] trade PC for T*T (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 10:48:44 -0400
Anyone interested in tradeing their older Ten Tec gear for a 486 Toshiba Satilite 1900 notebook let me know. This would be a nice Field Day, portable, or backup pc, as well as running a Pegasus. I've
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00692.html (7,037 bytes)

123. [TenTec] 555 NB - is it working? (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 15:07:58 -0400
Try it mobile..... you'll know! -Jeff ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet acce
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00707.html (7,435 bytes)

124. [TenTec] Triton receiver coverage (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 06:37:41 -0400
To the brotherhood of Ten*Tec users: A couple days back I had the wonderful fortune of receiving my first Triton. After a quick run through and tune up of BFOs and such she came right up to snuff, ye
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00722.html (7,876 bytes)

125. [TenTec] Re: Triton receiver coverage (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:00:03 -0400
I know, I know, all this stuff has probably all been gone over before. But it's all new to me! What is the beeping on 14.000 of 544 digital? Sounds like a calibrator or something but it's not in the
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00752.html (7,332 bytes)

126. [TenTec] Talk in (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 21:25:30 -0400
Is there a freq. for list members to get on the air and gab T*T? Maybe on the XX.067.00's any band to go with the net freq? For those who may not be able to make the net. Just an idea, might be a way
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00758.html (7,119 bytes)

127. [TenTec] Tentec Scout/ "Anything Positive" (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 09:05:57 -0400
Don , I don't think anyone can say anything negative about the Scout in truth. Rather just point out the obvious, it is limited to ham bands, ssb and cw, it doesn't have the panash in looks of a do-a
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00772.html (11,395 bytes)

128. [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77 (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 09:34:13 -0400
Good point Bob, also if T*T were to come out with fits-all rig it would have to employ the same type design of everyone else. In short it would be pretty blah. Even the imports have had to go to DC t
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00775.html (9,699 bytes)

129. [TenTec] Tentec Scout/ "Anything Positive" (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:34:39 -0400
This may be true Clark but a lot of rigs won't even turn on at less than 12 Vs or if the voltage starts to drop they cut right off in mid dit . No fun at all! I've ran a Scout off battery and notice
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00793.html (9,860 bytes)

130. [TenTec] external signal source (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 11:20:00 -0400
I don't think you'll find a better VFO than one based on the PTO. While it may be possible to use something else I don't think it would be an improvement. The drawback with all PTOs is they are temp
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00794.html (9,246 bytes)

131. [TenTec] Back to the future (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 13:38:17 -0400
Here's an interesting point. My 15 year old son took great interest in my newest T*T member a Trition. I enjoy older rigs and have some fine Swans and Drakes as well as T*Ts so like all new old rigs
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00804.html (7,523 bytes)

132. [TenTec] Omni V - Instability (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 11:32:34 -0400
Carey, Yes that sure sounds like a problem on the LO / Mixer board. Could be a failed crystal but also may be a bad solder joint, trimmer cap, or something along that line. The best way to track it d
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00844.html (11,950 bytes)

133. [TenTec] Ten Tec 544 Supplement (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 13:14:23 -0400
Can any one tell me what the "Ten Tec 544 Supplement " is ? I saw it in the past QST reviews. Thank you, Jeff aa8ve ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Interne
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00847.html (7,881 bytes)

134. [TenTec] Ten Tec 544 Supplement (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 17:23:16 -0400
544 is a Triton IV digital. What is your supplement for the Omni-V just the QST review? Or is it something else? I don't want to miss out on anything! 73 de Jeff aa8ve - Who has been having a great d
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00853.html (8,335 bytes)

135. [TenTec] Ten Tec 544 Supplement (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 1999 22:26:27 -0400
Yes the model numbers are confusing, it really looks haywire if you go to the unofficial T-T page and select all models from the index. Take a look down the list and see what pattern there is, man I
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00862.html (9,294 bytes)

136. [TenTec] Horror story (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 07:54:27 -0500
Here's an e-mail I got from a friend who just got a new rig: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boy it's a good holes. I also found all >of the little brass screws we
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00877.html (9,427 bytes)

137. [TenTec] Summary: no SPOT function on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:30:14 -0400
Ten Tec CW xmit is on the displayed freq. and they have always been. The offset is on receive like it should be. The Jap. rigs have their own way of doing things. This is not an error! -Jeff- AA8VE O
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00438.html (11,844 bytes)

138. [TenTec] Summary: no SPOT function on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:37:54 -0400
I don't understand why you guys need a "spot tone" to run CW, can't you hear the pitch of the station you are talking to? -Jeff- AA8VE On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:54:39 -0500 "George T. Baker" <w5yr@swbel
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00440.html (11,838 bytes)

139. [TenTec] Summary: no SPOT function on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:51:19 -0400
I guess to be correct I should say the transmit is on the displayed freq. in the rigs with a micro processor and pll tuning. On the pto tuned rigs like Scout, Omni-D, ect. the offset is on Xmit. I ha
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00442.html (13,036 bytes)

140. [TenTec] Summary: no SPOT function on Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: aa8ve@juno.com (JEFF S JOHNSON)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:27:57 -0400
Sure Steve, this is something a lot of ops. never get. I'll try to explain, lets say you have a rig with no offset on CW. Transmit and Receive are on the same freq. like 7Mhz You call CQ and another
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00446.html (13,168 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu