Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ad6id@arrl.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] RE: CT Bug Report (score: 1)
Author: ad6id@arrl.net (Tony)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:46:16 -0700
Hi Ken, While you're considering Cabrillo to .BIN, how about ADIF to .BIN. That would be in the spirit of open interchange. and probably be more widely accepted. 73, Tony, AD6ID -- WWW: http://www.k1
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-07/msg00082.html (7,745 bytes)

2. [ct-user] ?CT963 & IC706IIG? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:22:54 -0700
Hi folks, OK, my new IC706IIG is going to Field Day for the first time. It is not listed in the supported rigs for ct versions 9.40 thru 9.63. Which of the following Icoms behaves like a 706IIG? IC 7
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00068.html (7,204 bytes)

3. [ct-user] ?CT & IC706IIG part 2? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:58:45 -0700
Hello again, I found part of my answer on http://www.k1ea.com/radio.htm So, my 706IIG is now set at the address for a IC735 (04H), and the error from CT963 is _still_ "radio not echoing". Here's the
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00069.html (7,120 bytes)

4. [ct-user] ?CT & IC706IIG still not talking (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:57:43 -0700
Hello yet again, I am running CT963 under DOS on a Toshiba Portege 7100 with the CI-V connection on COM1. I cannot get any communication using CT running under DOS. I t_e_s_t comm by typing a frequen
/archives//html/CT-User/2001-06/msg00073.html (7,662 bytes)

5. [ct-user] Re:CT<-MP freq reporting (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 19:12:27 -0800
Hi All, Neither TRX-Manager nor Log-EQF have any problem tracking frequency changes on my FT1000MP. They poll it frequently; it doesn't send info unsolicited. I had trouble getting CT9.50 and CT9.40
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00062.html (10,091 bytes)

6. [ct-user] Re:CT<->FT1000MP Frequency Change Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 13:19:15 -0800
It's beginning to sound like there may be a shortcoming in the FT1000MP command set that allows it to get into this stuck band reporting mode. I have _never_ seen a stuck frequency problem with TRX-M
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00069.html (8,729 bytes)

7. [ct-user] Re:CT<->FT1000MP Frequency Change Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 06:03:35 -0800
Oh, yes. I'm in VFO mode I also notice that if I change freq from CT, _both_ bandstack registers on VFO A (main) are sent to the bottom of the band (14.000, 7.000). Then if I tune one and switch to t
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-11/msg00077.html (7,645 bytes)

8. [ct-user] CT9.50 and rig interface (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:44:39 -0700
Hi folks, I just ran CT 9.50 for the first time; 9.40 was previously installed. CT is able to control the FT1000MP via COMTSR1 by either typing a frequency in the call sign space or changing bands wi
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00110.html (7,647 bytes)

9. FYI: [ct-user] CT9.50 reads CT9.40 .BIN (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> (by way of Tony <ad6id@arrl.net>) (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 17:10:42 -0700
Yes, the .BIN file will work with either version. - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> http://www.ad1c.com -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrativ
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-10/msg00114.html (7,207 bytes)

10. [ct-user] LPT Keying Cable? Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 07:57:27 -0700
Just a couple of long shots, Frank (My 300MHz P-II only has LPT1) When you mention DX4WIN, I infer that you were running Windows 95?, on your old 486. To run PURE DOS as Brian mentioned, you must reb
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-07/msg00071.html (9,714 bytes)

11. [ct-user] Summary - Keying 1000MP (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 19:34:55 -0700
Hi John, I asked this question of Yaesu last year and got the answer that the output of the internal keyer is in firmware; it is not a physical point. He also mentioned that they corrected their oops
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-04/msg00028.html (8,686 bytes)

12. [ct-user] Getting DX spots from Internet / Telnet? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 10:27:52 -0800
Hi Jim & the group, I tried the telnet part of W4AN's article. I was able to run telnet on my PC ("telnet cluster.akorn.net" as a run command) and connect directly to the packet cluster. You should n
/archives//html/CT-User/2000-02/msg00033.html (8,131 bytes)

13. [ct-user] Beam Headings (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 18:20:10 -0800
Hi Bob & all, OK. I sure wouldn't want to set lat and long every time I start the program. I put them in the config file along with everything else I can think of. But using either at the call entry
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00004.html (8,643 bytes)

14. [ct-user] Re: W1GEE Interface Cable (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 15:05:37 -0800
Gary and all, http://www.hosenose.com/w1gee.htm#lcu makes cables/level translators for darned near everything. The FT1000 and FT1000D require the level shifter; the FT1000MP does not (I use a $10 Rad
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00091.html (7,474 bytes)

15. [ct-user] Beam Headings (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 14:23:55 -0800
The syntax in the ct.cfg file is like this: ... LAT: 37.05 LONG: 121.5 ... not SETLAT, SETLONG Related - During ARRL SS Phone, F10 (Display Beam heading) did nothing. I used ct 9.43. It used to work
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-11/msg00181.html (8,283 bytes)

16. [ct-user] ?CT9.37 <-> FT1000MP comm prob? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 12:19:32 -0700
Hi folks, I finally got my FT1000MP connected to the computer. TRX-Manager communicates perfectly in both directions. So, success there. (Oh, and I got the Phillipines - spotted in TRXmgr DXcluster).
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00013.html (7,718 bytes)

17. [ct-user] OK:CT9.40! (?CT9.37 <-> FT1000MP comm prob?) (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 1999 14:04:31 -0700
Thanks Steve, CT 9.40 communicates properly with the 1000MP. But there is no mention of a FT1000MP fix from 9.37 to 9.40 [Ken a place to add a comment in the history file] However, the other complain
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00014.html (8,785 bytes)

18. [ct-user] Re: 1000MP problems with CT ?ver??? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:01:12 -0700
Hi all, I had trouble with ct & 1000MP last month. With some help from you guys, here's what I found. CT 9.40 communicates properly with the 1000MP. CT 9.37 would NOT work with my computer, but the c
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-10/msg00086.html (9,590 bytes)

19. [ct-user] ?simple/stable CT for FD? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <ad6id@arrl.net> (Tony)
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 09:09:11 -0700
Hi folks, We'll be using ct.something for field day this year. The donated computer may be as lowly as a 286 with 4M RAM, maybe a 386. We will have no external connections for rig, rotor, DVP, networ
/archives//html/CT-User/1999-05/msg00012.html (7,290 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu