Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:af5cc2@gmail.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW in-band multi op (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 15:50:39 -0600
I had to laugh when I saw some of Mike's ideas because this was me this past weekend (unfortunately)! I was using my newly acquired Kenwood TS590S in the CQWW and just doing search and pounce so I pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00028.html (11,757 bytes)

162. Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 20:26:02 -0600
I run a sidetone of around 550hz. During QRM conditions I rarely use the shift control, but often using the width on the Kenwood TS590, narrowing the filter as tight as 100hz if necessary. Really hel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00100.html (11,123 bytes)

163. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assistance (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:35:44 -0600
Do they have a reflector to get on to complain about all of the rule changes? 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00012.html (7,964 bytes)

164. [CQ-Contest] Scandanvian propagation question (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 14:17:16 -0600
Something I have noticed during the ARRL DX contest, and other winter contests, as well as during casual DXing, maybe a LA/SM/OH contester will have a better explanation for this: This past Friday I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00089.html (7,803 bytes)

165. Re: [CQ-Contest] Announcing A New Digital Contest (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:33:23 -0600
It has a contest overlay of "all enclosed antennas". I wonder what that overlay means? Indoor antennas? 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00029.html (11,621 bytes)

166. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL to allow self-spotting in contests (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:33:58 -0600
Just don't enter the assisted category and it is business as usual. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00076.html (10,778 bytes)

167. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL to allow self-spotting in contests (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:05:47 -0600
Those accepted rules were already thrown out a few years ago with the changes to the VHF contests. 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00126.html (21,768 bytes)

168. Re: [CQ-Contest] Changes to RAC Sections in 2023 - likely changes to FD, SS CW, SS SSB, ARRL 160 (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 14:13:16 +0000
Thank goodness they didn't break Newfoundland and Labrador into separate sections. That would really make a clean sweep difficult! 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-05/msg00048.html (10,265 bytes)

169. [CQ-Contest] Fwd: ARRL Digital Contest log help (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 12:38:51 -0500
I used the WSJT-X logger for the ARRL digital contest, which generated an ADI file, which the ARRL won't accept for the contest. I have tried to find ways to convert it to a Cabrillo file, with no lu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-06/msg00034.html (7,548 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu