- 141. [SECC] Alabama QSO Party (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:31:31 -0400
- Will be looking for ya Dan... Tom - W4BQF Eastern surburds of Cecil, Ga.
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-09/msg00097.html (7,278 bytes)
- 142. [SECC] GQP Final Scores on Web (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:55:29 -0400
- Mike, Congrats. That was very well done. I think it is very important to have contest scores published as soon as possible so everyone can find out how they faired. I'm sure you went through a lot of
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-08/msg00056.html (7,894 bytes)
- 143. [SECC] Fwd: Re: Rules Change for GQP 2006 (score: 105)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:18:09 -0400
- Hmmm...maybe I can do CW, but I sure seem to have trouble addressing email's!!
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-08/msg00110.html (7,063 bytes)
- 144. [SECC] FW: Bill Windle QSO Party - June 11, 2005 (score: 105)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:45:26 -0400
- Previously sent to W4NTI. Tommy W4BQF It's not really very much different from any other CW club/group. The CFO (Chicken Fat Operators) group was actually formed by W9TO as a spoof of the FOC (First
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-06/msg00019.html (8,068 bytes)
- 145. [SECC] Moon Phase & ARRL dx test & Stuff (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:47:46 -0400
- Due to the fact that N4GG and KU8E (and others) did a magnificent job at PJ4R and Rich commandeered K4BAI for this years ARRL DX contest, the phase of the moon was correct and I ate all my grits. Acc
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-06/msg00076.html (6,886 bytes)
- 146. [SECC] NEQP (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:09:59 -0400
- Just in case anyone in the SECC is using YPlog by VE6YP, I have made workable .rul and .cty files that is fully functional for this weekend's New England QSO Party. The Italian ARI DX contest is also
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00029.html (6,192 bytes)
- 147. [SECC] CA QP Certificate and Network Analyzer (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 21:35:24 -0400
- Even though I probably placed about 9,873,321st place, I received a 'High Achievement In Georgia' award from the NCCC. Very nice looking wall paper and as Bill say's, something like this would encour
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00030.html (8,030 bytes)
- 148. [SECC] CA QP Certificate and Network Analyzer (score: 105)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 22:19:58 -0400
- Are you kidding? I'm talking about the VARC and most of these folks can't count over 2 meters, much less divide something... :>))) Tommy W4BQF Good challenge. How about a low power contest where you
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00032.html (10,140 bytes)
- 149. [SECC] NEQP (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 22:34:25 -0400
- Fun contest, but not enough time to do much good! SCORE = 6650 POINTS = 190 MULTIPLIERS = 35 OP TIME = 6 hrs BAND QSO'S DUPS POINTS MULTIPLIERS SCORE -- -- -- -- -- -- 160 0 0 0 0 0 80 24 0 48 1 48 4
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00037.html (6,327 bytes)
- 150. [SECC] WPX (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 21:31:36 -0400
- Call: W4BQF Operator: W4BQF Class: SOAB-HP QTH: eastern suburbs of Cecil Operating Time: 15 hrs Omni 6 Plus/Titan 3/80 mtr Dipole Score: 1,307,136 Points: 2533 Multi: 512 QSO's: 1011 What sunspot min
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-05/msg00095.html (6,227 bytes)
- 151. [SECC] KO4RR Plaque (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:33:31 -0500
- Why not just make the GQP for rovers only? Maybe the SECC could come up with 56 categories for rovers by doing that? Tommy W4BQF Maybe have 3 categories for rovers : 1) S/O - does both driving operat
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00005.html (10,877 bytes)
- 152. [SECC] [SEDXC] Memorial Service for K4GA (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:47:20 -0400
- What about the possibility that a native Georgian would like to be able to get the K4GA call sign? Tommy W4BQF -- Well, I need to check it out, but I'm afraid that I have egg on my face. I just recei
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00042.html (8,842 bytes)
- 153. [SECC] [SEDXC] K4GA (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:10:56 -0400
- Thanks. That is perhaps the most frank discussion on the call vanity system I've ever read! After having lived in northern Virginia for 35 years, it certainly rings a bell! Tommy W4BQF --Original Mes
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00046.html (9,303 bytes)
- 154. [SECC] GQP (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:27:44 -0400
- May as well throw my 2 cents into the rules discussion. I didn't participate in the GQP this year, partly because I had company and partly because there is no category in which I can participate. I d
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00134.html (7,983 bytes)
- 155. [SECC] W4AN Club Call (was: RE: Field Day and W4AN) (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:07:32 -0400
- I agree with the 'first come, first serve' issuance of W4AN, however I would suggest a time limitation for requesting it. Such as one can only request the call say, 30 or 45 days before the specific
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00256.html (13,856 bytes)
- 156. [SECC] W4AN (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:54:59 -0400
- Larry, Very interesting post, with merits. However, please allow me to disagree with just one point you made, and that is about this being a 'controversy'. As I understand it, the reflector is the of
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00275.html (10,838 bytes)
- 157. [SECC] New projects (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:30:00 -0400
- I have made a 2 element Extended Double Zepp for 20m, which on EZNEC shows 14.7dB forward gain and 20 dB F/B, if mounted a half wave high. Have one built and was up in the trees, but wind + trees = 1
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00289.html (7,700 bytes)
- 158. [SECC] OK, what did you guys do? (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:36:40 -0400
- Bill, This is not a 'personal' shot, but having read all of the SECC post over the past three weeks or longer, I think this one is the most mis-guided post I've read. Since the SECC use's the reflect
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00294.html (7,992 bytes)
- 159. [SECC] fcc uses contest logs for evidence (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:07:23 -0400
- I've been trying to not say anything about this thread, but I just can't control my fingers. :>))) You know, we complain when the FCC does no regulation, now are we complaining because they are tryin
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-04/msg00311.html (9,358 bytes)
- 160. [SECC] GQP (score: 99)
- Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:53:56 -0500
- I vote to keep the GQP. Tom - W4BQF
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-03/msg00022.html (6,161 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu