Mail Archive Search: <+from:aldermant at alltel.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant: 359 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ alltel.net: 366 ]

Total 194 documents matching your query.

161. [SECC] GQP Confusion (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:30:33 -0500; I think the older I get the more easily I get confused (nothing new?). The 2003 GQP had a catagory for High Power, CW. The 2004 GQP rules clearly state Modes: There are no separate catagories for mod; /archives//html/SECC/2005-03/msg00078.html (6,458 bytes)
162. [SECC] ARRL DX CW (score: 105): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:27:06 -0500; Total operating time = 16 hours 3 minutes. CONTEST: ARRL DX CONTEST CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP ALL HIGH MODE: CW CALLSIGN: W4BQF CLAIMED-SCORE: 525336 CLUB: South East Contest Club OPERATORS: W4BQF NAME: To; /archives//html/SECC/2005-02/msg00073.html (6,942 bytes)
163. [SECC] Interesting SS site (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 06:56:48 -0500; http://www.withmy2hands.org/k6kyj/79not80.htm Tom - W4BQF; /archives//html/SECC/2004-12/msg00000.html (5,519 bytes)
164. [SECC] Ten Tec Orion (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:58:18 -0500; I will soon be putting my Ten Tec Orion up for sale and want to offer it to any interested club members first. This Orion was manufactured this year and currently has v1.372 firmware loaded. The only; /archives//html/SECC/2004-12/msg00061.html (6,992 bytes)
165. [SECC] Sweepstakes (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:47:25 -0500; I'm not out to set a record, but for sure I'm gonna be the high score from Cecil, Ga.!! this year; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00011.html (8,300 bytes)
166. [SECC] Sweepstakes (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 05:55:47 -0500; WHERE WAS ALASKA???? Lot's of fun, but never could find Alaska. Worked many SECC'ers, but had a tough time copying some. Could not hear Jeff on 40m but he was 10 over on 80m! SCORE = 134142 POINTS =; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00082.html (8,167 bytes)
167. [SECC] K4OGG, CWSS (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 10:37:49 -0500; My Titan 3 blew up, sitting in stand-by on the desk. Just got it back from Ten Tec on Thursday. When testing it, could only get 1200w max into the dummy load. Taking it apart and inspecting it, I fou; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00093.html (10,028 bytes)
168. [SECC] K4OGG, CWSS (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 15:36:10 -0500; Hi Jeff and thanks for the info, Yep, I have looked at the 80m dipole with EZNEC an all of the bands. I left it up for SS primarily because the of the 40m and 80m pattern. At my QTH in Virginia I use; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00103.html (13,691 bytes)
169. [SECC] Careful with SS logs!! (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:34:13 -0500; I just got a confirmation from the ARRL Contest Robot, accepting my log submission. However, out of 849 Q's, it found 19 typo's!! All of the typo's had to do with correct spacing of the received info; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00145.html (6,498 bytes)
170. [SECC] Re: Old (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:55:13 -0500; With all the talk about 'old' contacts, was anyone around when the GSN was started? My brain cell is fuzzy on this, but I think I was part of the start up group that got the Ga. Slow Net going on CW.; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00156.html (7,070 bytes)
171. [SECC] Old? (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:28:04 -0500; Since the recent thread about 'old' (er) hams, I was curious about what happened in the recent SS. Mainly becaues I recalled a heck of a lot of check numbers being in the 50's. So, out of 849 QSO's i; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00183.html (6,750 bytes)
172. [SECC] ARRL 175-mi contest circle for SECC (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:26:32 -0500; Legal....as in not cheating to obtain improved collective scores. Tom - W4BQF; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00228.html (10,254 bytes)
173. [SECC] Circle for CQ WW DX CW (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:56:45 -0500; If your are referring to the red circle on the SECC web site, W4BQF is always out of the circle. Tom - W4BQF; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00289.html (7,388 bytes)
174. [SECC] CQP practice (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:12:07 -0500; 13 Q's 11 provinces Tom - W4BQF; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00000.html (5,345 bytes)
175. [SECC] CQP and Murphy (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 07:55:32 -0500; Score: 52866 Points: 534 Multi: 99 QSO's: 178 Total time: 7 hours For the first time ever, Mr. Murphy visited me during a contest. First, my Titan 3 blew up (probably a p.s. capacitor), then my Orion; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00008.html (6,692 bytes)
176. [SECC] CQP Score - Corrected (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:33:23 -0500; I just discovered that even my contest software 'murphy'ed' me! Gave me credit for counties per band (heck, the score looked better that way :-). Score: 25632 Q's: 182 Mult: 47 Points: 534 Tom - W4BQ; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00010.html (6,234 bytes)
177. [SECC] Amendment (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:14:00 -0500; I vote yes for the amendment to add an officer to the SECC. Tom - W4BQF; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00136.html (6,344 bytes)
178. TT Re: A long post about the SECC...was: Re: [SECC] (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 23:39:25 -0500; BUT if you have to have this same discussion anually, doesn't that tell you something? I understand Lee's explanation and probably the reason for the group, lacking the dense population where a club; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00022.html (10,455 bytes)
179. [SECC] Club (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 07:16:14 -0500; I have been reading the responses, or if you will, the defenses, about the SECC. And unfortunately, with the exception of K4GA, the word 'change' is not in the vocabulary of the members. The SECC ele; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00053.html (7,696 bytes)
180. TT Re: [SECC] Club (score: 99): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 12:39:26 -0500; club?....evidentally that is not their job?....what is their job? Absolutely not! Is there an answer? Heck, my communication from the SECC was to be welcomed as a new member. What the heck is C & Bls; /archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00061.html (9,925 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]