Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aldermant: 359 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ alltel.net: 366 ]

Total 194 documents matching your query.

181. [SECC] Club (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 13:04:42 -0500
I think the entire point of the discussion has been missed completely. I am not, and I would think Jeff is not, interested in making wholesale changes to the SECC. What I am asking is what does this
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00062.html (10,717 bytes)

182. TT Re: [SECC] Club (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:43:03 -0500
Sorry ED. I've only been an active CW ham for 53 years and I haven't learned how to do that yet. Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00072.html (8,300 bytes)

183. TT [SECC] Club (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:35:09 -0500
Tom - W4BQF (eastern surburbs of greater downtown Cecil, Ga., population 373) 1. What got you interested in ham Radio? My Dad, W4BVK (sk). He ran a Viking II and a homebrew 813 amp with those beautif
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00095.html (12,154 bytes)

184. [SECC] Fw: TT [TenTec] QST Prod Rev Expanded Reports: a proposal (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:50:44 -0500
For those who may be interested in the excellent test reports that KC1SX provides from the ARRL test lab, here is a chance to provide you inputs an what you like/dislike about the reports. (My 'read'
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00097.html (8,296 bytes)

185. [SECC] Calllaway & Other (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:05:14 -0500
I certainly would make it to Callaway, if that is to be organized. Unfortunately driving up to Atlanta area for a lunch meeting is kinda pushing the wet string! For what it's worth, and depending on
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00214.html (7,017 bytes)

186. [SECC] TQP (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:34:38 -0500
Not much activity on this one, but good chance to check out new Orion beta firmware! QSO's = 51 Multi = 18 Score = 3054 Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00222.html (5,858 bytes)

187. [SECC] W4BQF (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:13:16 -0500
This is mainly for information when deciding on what to do with the circle. First, if I get bumped out of the circle in order to bring more members into it, that really should be the thing to do. (an
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00392.html (6,838 bytes)

188. [SECC] re:Club Circle (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:58 -0500
want SENT 9/29/04 AT 10 am.: This is mainly for information when deciding on what to do with the circle. First, if I get bumped out of the circle in order to bring more members into it, that really s
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00423.html (7,835 bytes)

189. [SECC] CQP Practice (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:04:01 -0500
Since the CQP practice session starts at 11 pm our time, what band(s) would be most productive? Would 20m be the place to start, or 40m? Think 80 m would probably be non-productive that early at nigh
/archives//html/SECC/2004-09/msg00426.html (5,984 bytes)

190. [SECC] Help with NAQP (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 07:50:28 -0500
Does anyone see an 'obvious' problem with this: START-OF-LOG: 2.0 CONTEST: NAQP-CW CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP ALL LOW CALLSIGN: W4BQF CLAIMED-SCORE: 23064 CLUB: SECC OPERATORS: W4BQF NAME: Tom Alderman ADDR
/archives//html/SECC/2004-08/msg00037.html (6,863 bytes)

191. [SECC] NAQP-CW (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:45:05 -0500
Thanks to K4SB for trying to help me with this submission to the NAQP web site. After reformatting the header in the exact sequence of their example, their web bot accepted my submission. I had all o
/archives//html/SECC/2004-08/msg00041.html (6,905 bytes)

192. [SECC] GAQP (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:49:48 -0500
Can someone tell me when the results of the GAQP will be posted? Thanks... Tom - W4BQF
/archives//html/SECC/2004-07/msg00070.html (5,898 bytes)

193. [SECC] 04 CQWPX Claimed (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 18:46:30 -0500
CONTEST: CQ WPX CATEGORY: SINGLE-OP ALL HIGH CW CATEGORY-OVERLAY: TB-WIRES MODE: CW CALLSIGN: W4BQF CLAIMED-SCORE: 1131172 CLUB: SECC OPERATORS: W4BQF NAME: Tom Alderman ADDRESS: 254 Nichols Lane ADD
/archives//html/SECC/2004-06/msg00005.html (7,093 bytes)

194. [SECC] ARRL Sweepstakes (score: 99)
Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 09:21:46 -0500
Does anyone have a workable time strategy established for the CW Sweepstakes contest that they would like to share? Since you are allowed to operate 24 hours out of the 30 hours, time management can
/archives//html/SECC/2004-06/msg00023.html (7,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu