Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:aleith@syd.eastlink.ca: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] more to query (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:11:22 -0300
Further to my question, I also encountered a problem logging ALL VE3 QSOs. The program would not recognize them when they were new multipliers (VE3 as a call area/province and V*3RAC as a bonus), alt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00006.html (7,061 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] RAC/CT & Icom (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:02:50 -0300
There's probably an easy fix for this but I'm stumped. I used the latest freeware copy of CT for the first time with DXbase 2006 for the RAC Test on the weekend. When I set up the CT log, it prompted
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00007.html (7,288 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] IOTA help (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:09:32 -0300
I have set up CT to log for the weekend IOTA Contest but it doesn't seem to have any allowance for the serial number I receive. When I type in an island # it logs and shows the multiplier but can't s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00478.html (7,013 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] IOTA help (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:56:53 -0300
Thanks all. Problem solved by editing the sd.ini file and changing the baud rate to 1200 (for my IC-761) from the default. Don't have any idea what conditions will be like and I have a major antenna
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00497.html (9,638 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] DREAMING (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:54:59 -0300
Now this is pretty reasonable and simple. Simple is good. Works for me. 73 Al, VE1AL _______________ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00487.html (13,931 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 00:07:35 -0400
Cut numbers: NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO. Do you want to know how I really feel? 73 Al, VE1AL _______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00060.html (9,527 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:28:55 -0300
Somewhat distressing and frustrating, I have found in recent contests that many Europeans call their CQs in this format on CW: DD9DD DD9DD TEST AA (using this station as an example and All Asia at th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00310.html (6,865 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:19:31 -0300
Well, Dale, I prefer something a little more familiar to me -- especially if I am in a hurry also. I learned my CQ style for contests many years ago. It is always a variation of CQ Contest, this is V
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00319.html (10,180 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Morse Not Dead!!! (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:20:24 -0300
While it is illegal to transmit SOS by radio if there is no emergency, flashing it on a screen is not quite the same. I guess none of the rock ' rollers who are hams were involved in the planning for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00122.html (9,498 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bermuda DX Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:29:08 -0300
Yes, there was. I entered it for years with the hope of one day winning. I never did. Don't have a clue about what happened to it. 73 Al, VE1AL ____________________ Today for reasons I can't put my f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00131.html (7,964 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolution of the ARRL DX Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:29:11 -0400
While it may lack punctuation, it showed up on my screen in three paragraphs and I found it relatively easy to read. And I found it very informative. I didn't get any of the computer characters that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00516.html (13,078 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:11:43 -0300
I'm not involved in the test myself but I have been listening. I thought, the first time I heard just a number and no signal report that it was a mistake. I've heard just the number given about a hal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00741.html (8,707 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:32:18 -0300
Perhaps, then, casual contesters (I being one) should start to foul the system by giving honest reports. I certainly will do this in every contest I play around in, in the future. If the receiving st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00751.html (10,134 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:54:27 -0300
I have to tell you, Dick, that I have never had a problem giving a 59 report in a contest. And while I agree that it is boring and quite unnecessary, a signal report preceding the serial number (what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00753.html (12,381 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:59:17 -0300
If the contest organizers don't pay any attention to the reports exchanged then I guess they don't really care. But as I understand it, Tom, the WPX rules clearly indicate an exchange is a signal rep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00755.html (10,435 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:16:03 -0300
That's my question, Jim. If we're tilting at windmills there's no point. But if we can foul up the system enough for the contest sponsors to clarify, or change, the rules we will have accomplished so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00757.html (9,881 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:52:47 -0300
Almost every one of the stations you mentioned are big guns with lots of power and great antenna systems. They are, in no way, indicative of band conditions. The little pistols, like you and me, are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00233.html (8,737 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:52:50 -0300
Well, Barry, you beat me because I didn't even S&P. This is one CQWW in which I did not participate. I've missed a few others in the last bunch of years because I was not able to operate but this yea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00235.html (11,908 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 million qso's? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:40:11 -0400
I have to agree, Jim, that contest exchanges are not "real QSOs" and I add to that the record made by KV4AA who seldom had time for anything more than a contest exchange. The same can, and I will say
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00250.html (8,429 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:00:30 -0300
One of the things I noticed during the time I was around this weekend was the lack of SSB below 7030. I didn't make a single contest QSO but in the time I was around there were only a very few SSB si
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00119.html (6,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu