Mail Archive Search: <+from:amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@txrx.demon.co.uk: 190 ]

Total 190 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] Titan 425 Question (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:37:35 -0000; significance of RF not cool the tank water through industrial RF generators the coil. I have not Are you serious - is there a choice?!!!! Steve (hic) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00102.html (8,520 bytes)
2. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 09:05:23 -0000; average power supplied one RF cycle at the operating conditions."> The same wording is used in the UK licence - I guess it is an internationally agreed form of words that covers all situations. point; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00172.html (9,875 bytes)
3. [AMPS] LDMOS on 23cm (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:12:47 -0000; I've not yet done anything persoanlly, but I'm told that the Ericsson stuff is easier to use. (get it from Richardson Electronics). Steve --Original Message-- From: Rod Preston <rpreston@netspace.net; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00198.html (7,936 bytes)
4. [AMPS] PEP philosophy (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:18:53 -0000; --Original Message-- From: measures <measures@vcnet.com> To: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 07 January 2000 17:31 Subject: Re; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00213.html (8,421 bytes)
5. [AMPS] RF Choke Forms (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 08:18:54 -0000; other ceramic. It was I'm not familiar with delrin, but I can't believe there could be any electrical problem with PTFE/Teflon. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions; /archives//html/Amps/2000-01/msg00308.html (8,475 bytes)
6. [AMPS] MICOM1000 by MOTOROLA (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 07:27:48 -0000; about 1000 W PEP... 16 of them ? Linearity specifications in commercial systems are often more stringent than in amateur applications, and the spec has to be guaranteed over temperature, time and sup; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00043.html (7,396 bytes)
7. [AMPS] BeO Cautions (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 07:25:28 -0000; The fumes are unhealthy if you incinerate it. As far as I have been able to research, dust is only a problem at very small particle size, and then only after long term occupational exposure. As I und; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00170.html (9,106 bytes)
8. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 07:44:47 -0000; Distortion in Vacuum is a poor device However, he distortion. "the central parabola". The the top end of circuit may the peak. Hmmmmm - IF (big if) the combination of tube characteristics and drive; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00264.html (9,590 bytes)
9. SV: [AMPS] G2DAF and super cathode (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 07:37:24 -0000; --Original Message-- From: sm5ki <sm5ki@algonet.se> To: Ian White, G3SEK <G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 19 December 1999 23:40; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00265.html (8,414 bytes)
10. [AMPS] KM1H (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 08:44:31 -0000; I think recall a post from some months ago which gave a number for (something) electronics. In the context of the message, I assumed this was the trading name that Carl used. It's there in the archiv; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00068.html (7,604 bytes)
11. SV: [AMPS] feedback sought: Ameritron AL-80 (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 08:47:58 -0000; --Original Message-- From: Hans Goldschmidt <sm5ki@algonet.se> To: measures <measures@vcnet.com>; amps <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 30 October 1999 17:50 Subject: SV: SV: [AM; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00069.html (7,827 bytes)
12. [AMPS] KM1H (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 07:52:40 -0000; used. is now working Communications Jeremy was the (something)I couldn't remember, but with being away for a day plus the time lag, it was a bit irrelevant by the time it got posted... Steve -- FAQ o; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00131.html (8,455 bytes)
13. SV: SV: [AMPS] Capacitor series resonance (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 08:28:19 -0000; condensers are just like with each other? de I think Hans is correct. ATC type chips have intrinsic L well under 1nH. High voltage versions (5kV ish) are .4" sqaure and have a few nH L. Steve chip ca; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00175.html (8,978 bytes)
14. [AMPS] A look underneath the Ugly amp. chassis. (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 21:37:32 -0000; --Original Message-- From: Hans Goldschmidt <sm5ki@algonet.se> To: G0MJW <mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk>; Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 04 Nov; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00176.html (8,743 bytes)
15. [AMPS] Plate Transformer Ratings (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 08:02:02 -0000; 3100 volt secondary, wire the primaries feed them with 240 transformers. made no difference it's of any use, but secondaries in With 3KW voltage secondary The drop in peak voltage arises from dissip; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00379.html (8,258 bytes)
16. [AMPS] 2 tone intermod test (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 07:52:14 -0000; be hard to show to send the has the I've come to the conclusion that ALC problems or poor design account for a lot of the speech related splatter that doesn't show up with 2 tone tests. The TS830 se; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00457.html (9,565 bytes)
17. [AMPS] 2 tone intermod test (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:50:13 -0000; soon of level solid state ALC is better flickers. I know folks monitored better off. supply, more In general I agree, but on some rigs mic gain doesn't seem to matter as much and I don't think it's; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00462.html (10,495 bytes)
18. [AMPS] 4CX1600B Amplifier in new handbook (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 07:57:41 -0000; a new amplifier a the article and toroids for some T-225-8 core. Again, same problem.) The catalogue of a UK outlet for Micrometals lists a T225-8 and T225-26 (double the Al of the -8) but no -28 mat; /archives//html/Amps/1999-11/msg00554.html (9,290 bytes)
19. [AMPS] Amp with 12 8122 (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 07:56:47 +0100; lbs. It might be of more interest to the commercial and research guys than you think. There's a lot of people who prefer the old distributed tube amps for testing into difficult loads and I doubt tha; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00206.html (7,688 bytes)
20. Fw: [AMPS] Re: The Worldwide, No Holds Barred, SWR Quiz. (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 21:19:44 +0100; I'm sorry if this is a repeat, but it never appeared with me from the reflector. Steve --Original Message-- From: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@txrx.demon.co.uk> To: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>; /archives//html/Amps/1999-10/msg00258.html (11,796 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]