Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:andy@multibandcom.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

41. RE: [Karlnet] KARLNET RESPONSE_ ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:34:37 -0700
I was talking about something other than the KN100 or 200 well...you have the KN-100 http://www.cwlab.com/Products/KarlNet/KN-100.htm also...we have it in an attractive looking 19 dBi enclosed antenn
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00271.html (23,693 bytes)

42. RE: [Karlnet] KARLNET RESPONSE_ ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:35:17 -0700
Is that available right now? Wireless Authentication and Registration Protocol Basically, unless you have authorized someone to use your network, we re-direct them to a site of your choice (preferabl
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00272.html (10,738 bytes)

43. RE: [Karlnet]KARLNETRESPONSE_ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:44:21 -0700
Do we need a new configurator for 4.44? Does WARP work tightly with Radius? Is there any documentation? --Original Message-- From: Dan Metcalf [mailto:dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com] Sent: Monday, November
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00277.html (12,943 bytes)

44. RE: [Karlnet] watchdog timer (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:53:44 -0700
I see the same thing happen sometimes with ROR devices. I will save the configuration and the unit will not come back up. Luckily this last time I was able to use the lanminder to power cycle that ou
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00289.html (7,926 bytes)

45. RE: [Karlnet] Karlnet RADIUS dictionary entries? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:41:32 -0700
In some testing that I did I found that setting interface speed on the CPE created a more SDSL type service, and throttling at the TC base created more ADSL type service. Thus has been my policy. Bus
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00335.html (23,881 bytes)

46. RE: [Karlnet] KN50 packet loss bug (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 16:50:07 -0700
Yeah.. what the heck ? I got my first KN-50 unit today for testing. 85% packet loss over the wireless interface!!! With 1000ms pings when they did finally go through. This was 3/4 of a mile from my t
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00109.html (10,151 bytes)

47. RE: [Karlnet] KN50 packet loss bug (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 20:20:44 -0700
I was doing a dos ping test and using both the web interface and configurator to look at stats. I noticed about 100% retransmissions on the CPE's web interface. i.e. 400 packets transmitted, 400 retr
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00116.html (12,400 bytes)

48. RE: [Karlnet] Hang up of the cell (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:56:57 -0700
I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say.. " need a little more information " How many users? Anyone with poor signal quality? Longest link distance? Using latest firmware? Prism or Agere? Kn-100, Kn
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00158.html (9,661 bytes)

49. RE: [Karlnet] Max. Traffic throught 4.44 Karlnet AP1000 Base (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:32:05 -0700
The ping fill is greyed out on my configurator A ping fill test is generally over 6Mbps [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] saw -- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] ______________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00171.html (9,382 bytes)

50. RE: [Karlnet] Max. Traffic throught 4.44 Karlnet AP1000 Base (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 14:21:57 -0700
When doing tests from our Cisco router I usually send 500, 500 byte packets to test the link. That will usually push about 256 kbps both ways.. which I feel is a pretty good indication of a link. I a
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00175.html (12,627 bytes)

51. [Karlnet] Agere Firmware 6.08 utility (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:43:30 -0700
Ok.. so I got a shipment of KN-50's with the Agere cards that Karlnet bundles. And yes, I have packet loss that has prevented me from installing this product that doesn't work right out of the box wi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-02/msg00021.html (7,422 bytes)

52. RE: [Karlnet] Agere Firmware 6.08 utility (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:09:35 -0700
yes I had been using the "Short OEM card" AKA "World card (integrated)" AKA "Stub Card" AKA "The one with no printed circuit antenna and a diversity port". This is the card we had been using in every
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-02/msg00023.html (9,080 bytes)

53. FW: [Karlnet] Strange DNS issue (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:57:25 -0700
Is it posssible that anyone is using an APPLE airport? Apple airports, have in the past, broadcast DHCP on the wan interface causing DHCP problems. No, the customers routers WAN's are set to a static
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-02/msg00065.html (11,806 bytes)

54. FW: [Karlnet] Strange DNS issue (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:57:38 -0700
DHCP = troublesome, DNS redirect = troublesome. I have seen this problem for some time especially with Netgear routers that hand down their IP as DNS server. Often times restarting the router fixes i
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-02/msg00066.html (9,204 bytes)

55. RE: [Karlnet] KN50 Configuration... are we doing it wrong? (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 17:22:39 -0700
Did you actually get one to work with the stock card? Andy Henckel MultiBand Communications A TransAria Company 415 N. Higgins Ave. STE 26 Missoula, MT 59801 Work 406.721.9353 ext. 2026 Cell 406.580.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00031.html (10,060 bytes)

56. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:56:52 -0700
I don't buy the KN50 boards because I like having a solid outdoor spec. And using higher powered cards is a plus. I figure.. If the customer is in close I just use different combo of card and antenna
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00079.html (12,230 bytes)

57. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:57:55 -0700
I really haven't seen problems with power over Ethernet yet with carnet devices. We had to replace about 30 YDI etherant's last year due to lightning. All problem customers have since then purchased
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00096.html (11,502 bytes)

58. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:43:54 -0700
Then what is the main difference between the boards? the KN-50 has an outdoor spec. Look at the PDF on Karlnet's website. At least that is what they are claiming. ;) _________________________________
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00098.html (16,155 bytes)

59. RE: [Karlnet] RE: Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:00:47 -0700
Oops, spell check change Karlnet to Carnet.. hehehe I really haven't seen problems with power over Ethernet yet with carnet devices. We had to replace about 30 YDI etherant's last year due to lightni
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00099.html (11,972 bytes)

60. RE: [Karlnet] Reduction of Karlnet features w/out notification. (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Henckel" <andy@multibandcom.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:02:39 -0700
I was wishing that we could get higher processor boards, not lower. If the KN50 board can barely support the current feature set, what happens next year when Karlnet comes out with more features? The
/archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00101.html (18,393 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu