Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:av8tor@flash.net: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Banning The Use Of 144.200 MHz During Contests (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:25:26 -0400
My first comment will actually be a question, what would the rational be for banning 144200 during a contest? With so little 2 SSB activity in many parts of the country (and sometimes down here in FL
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00163.html (9,963 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144.200 (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 17:12:58 -0400
George W1LVL is right, if we don't use .200 then come contest time we'll have very few if any log entries. Alex, we have the same problem here in EL99 with FM repeater activity, there is NONE! 2mtr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00210.html (8,149 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Looking for WeakSig People in MD or DE (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:57:29 -0400
I might be sending some time in the Eastern MD area and was wondering if there are any weak sig people in that area? Currently for the weekend I'm here mobile on 144200. Would like to know if there i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00297.html (6,804 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Picking a Bone with Gene (Part 2) (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 14:57:25 -0400
I agree 100% with Les's observations. And would like to add that if we are to lower the score for contacts made with WSJT since its "easier" then I think a bonus should be given for CW contacts. In n
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00018.html (10,075 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Picking a Bone with Gene (Part 2) (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:03:14 -0400
I've made many MS WSJT contacts however about 25% of mine were not pre-arranged but random. Try tuning to 144.140 and call CQ U4 (example: CQ KI4FIA U4), put your rig in SPLIT mode and listen to 144
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00019.html (8,523 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] ssb question? (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:49:27 -0400
I don't know what the record for SSB on 2mtrs is but my personal best is working W5WRL in DM82 from EL99 (1276 miles). Was running 100 watts and a 6 element yagi at only 20'. My personal best on 432S
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00108.html (8,057 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] KI4FIA Contesting and RFI (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 09:02:06 -0400
Hello all and good luck in the contest this weekend. I will try to be QRV on 50MHz, 144MHz, 432MHz and 1296MHz. However starting Friday morning an FPL pole in front of my house started producing +20d
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-09/msg00068.html (7,312 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUCC and LoTW Update (score: 1)
Author: "GeorgeF." <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:07:22 -0400
If LoTW was easier to use I would be in favor of this. However I no longer use LoTW due to the complex security involved. I usually buy a new computer every 1 to 2 years. After having LoTW installed
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-07/msg00048.html (8,247 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] T43S on 2mtr CW during contest (score: 1)
Author: av8tor@flash.net
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:38:12 -0400
The high point of the contest was working T43S (Cuba) on 144.200 CW Sunday. Does anyone have the QSL info on T43S? Not listed in QRZ and I'm pretty sure I copied the callsign correct. Thanks George -
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-06/msg00083.html (7,055 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 14:24:57 -0500
Why I have given up the hobby, maybe some people can learn from those who hung-it-up before there is no one left to turn off the lights...... Many of you know or have worked me in the contests (KI4FI
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00011.html (16,542 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:12:21 -0500
Actually I did JT65 and FSK441 on 2 meters and made a far number of Meteor Scatter Q's on 2m FSK and a few 2m JT65 EME Q's Also I had high power on 2 meters, running nearly 350 watts from a Tokyo HyP
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00019.html (21,287 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:13:01 -0500
I agree with this part 100%. I have the card VUCC on 6 meters (actually I'm at 250 grids confirmed) and I have 111 grids confirmed on 2 meters. I never sent in the paper work for VUCC. 1 reason is it
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00020.html (8,945 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 17:13:22 -0500
When I was active I did a fair amount of Satellite work, but here again, we're loosing more satellites than we're gaining. I believe we're down to only 2 working SSB/CW satellites and 1 is older than
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00021.html (13,832 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 18:29:58 -0500
When I go to the amsat page (the one I found on Google) I click on Satellite Info, then Current Status. Then I clicked on AO-7, UO-11, RS-15, LO-19, FO-20. All came up with the Page Not Found error.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00026.html (9,711 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operations (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:28:50 -0500
Don't get me wrong, I loved every bit of VHF+ SSB/CW (never cared for FM). But it like eating a good potato chip, you can't stop at just 1 QSO. When I first started (2005) and for the first several y
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00033.html (13,224 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] SDR Play [ NEW SDR RECEIVER. 2 GHz, 8MHz bandwidth under $300 USD ] (score: 1)
Author: GeorgeF <av8tor@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 08:37:25 -0700
For SDR equipment, there is another interesting 1 that recently hit the market (and I believe it was designed here in America). The HackRF ONE, not only is it an SDR receiver it also a transmitter! W
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-09/msg00039.html (10,507 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu