Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bamos1@gmail.com: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Base equivalent (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:05:25 -0700
As a foundation engineer my first thought is wow! I think that foundation is way over designed. My second thought is if you have water at 5 feet you may be better off having the backhoe guy bring a d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00162.html (11,656 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Base equivalent (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 07:50:42 -0700
To go that thin I would recommend using a number 6 or larger rebar on the top and bottom. At that point you might be better off calling a local concrete company to put the foundation in for you. They
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00166.html (13,095 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Base equivalent (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:30:26 -0700
Patrick That sounds like quite the interesting setup. How well it works really depends on the soil conditions and the design loads. Having a reinforced foundation goes a long way. In this case the ex
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00183.html (15,822 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Idea for tower base. Comments please! (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:14:12 -0700
Hans Done properly this could work well. Many a solar panel is mounted in a similar situation. Many of them lay the beams as an H and connect the tower to the middle of the cross beam and put a pier
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00186.html (10,777 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Drain Pipe Passing Thru Tower Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:48:29 -0700
Move the pipe. If it were to ever leak you would have a leaning tower. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00201.html (10,310 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Drain Pipe Passing Thru Tower Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 06:24:01 -0700
Not wrong :). I have a bit of experience in the matter. I have seen structures fail from a leaky unpressurized sewer pipe that was fine when they built it. The top 1.5 feet will provide so little lat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00207.html (15,634 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Drain Pipe Passing Thru Tower Foundation (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 20:39:44 -0700
Im saying an old utility needs to be moved or abandoned. The new wet utilities should come in under the foundation with a minimum clearance and a reinforced footing that will easily span the less tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-01/msg00228.html (9,255 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Welding Rebar (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 22:47:30 -0700
If you weld it the rod may rust which will cause the concrete to burst. Not a fun situation as usually the recommended repair is completely remove the foundation and replace it. As a foundation engin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00258.html (14,513 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Raunchy pics (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 05:42:44 -0600
The frustrating thing about this for me is now I find tower talk emails in my spam folder. I un spam them but based on any number of factors my spam filter still thinks some of them are spam. _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00456.html (14,659 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Raunchy pics (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:01:13 -0600
I host a mail server for a few domains I own and/or manage. I have used spamassassin successfully for about 10 years. It does a pretty good job of finding spam, but when a few "spams" get sent from a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00474.html (13,142 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Rod Myths? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:36:29 -0600
I have the equipment to drill a 6 inch hole through just about anything, what if I placed my grounding rods in concrete or grout? Would that help or hurt the grounding? I do have a ground resistance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00520.html (25,430 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Rod Myths? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:21:08 -0600
Thanks for the advice. I think my best course will be to test the soil conductivity. The only time we have lightening here is during the summer storms; the soil is usually damp from the sprinklers al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00524.html (13,130 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank-up base (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 21:57:48 -0600
Mike, I deal with similar situations during my day job, I am a soil engineer. The great thing about soil engineering is every site is different, and every loading situation is different. What really
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00013.html (12,858 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Crank-up base (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 16:01:20 -0600
Mike, if you look in the phone book for a geotechnical engineer you will probably find what you are looking for. A geotechnical engineer will tell you how to prepare the soil. A structural engineer w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00023.html (11,711 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Crank-up base (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 21:22:49 -0600
TIA-222 has very little to say about the tower foundations except to say that a geotechnical report is required and frost depth is required. It is a standard used to calculate the loading conditions
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00031.html (10,408 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] How do bldg inspectors handle screw in earth anchors? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:24:39 -0600
As for the utilities usually the municipality doesn't inspect their installations as they are self regulating. The "screw anchors" ie "helical piers" are installed to a certain torque which the softw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-07/msg00087.html (11,821 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] How do bldg inspectors handle screw in earth anchors? (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 01:39:31 -0600
You wouldnt want to only rely on helical piers for a free standing tower. If its a guyed tower the guys resist nearly all of the lateral load so the base only has to support the dead weight of the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-07/msg00091.html (16,003 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Securing a Rohn BPL45 Base Plate (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 22:37:01 -0600
It all depends on the forces involved. As a general rule an anchor is good at keeping something from sliding around but if the bolt/anchor system could be subjected to pulling out you are better off
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00213.html (9,093 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Tower Foundation Pad Removal (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:37:36 -0600
Ken, Depending on where you live (how dry the soil is, what type of soil), and how much you expect the new foundation to cost you may save money hiring an engineer to design your new foundation. If y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00320.html (11,970 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Contents of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 140, Issue 47, Foundation Pad Removal (score: 1)
Author: Brian Amos <bamos1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:32:12 -0600
If it's a guyed tower then go for it! If it's a self supporting tower here is my answer: Yes you can ... kind of, depending on how you have the old bolts in place. If they are just cast into the conc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00330.html (9,048 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu