Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:barry.n1eu@gmail.com: 1936 ]

Total 1936 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:47:48 +0000
Why don't you make a recording from a second rx while you xmit into a dummy load or ask someone in qso to record you and send it to you? Seems obvious. 73, Barry N1EU ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00136.html (6,937 bytes)

102. Re: [TenTec] Going rate for Centurion (mod 422) amp? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:54:01 +0000
I'd say more like $1200 - $1500 for one in excellent condx with good tubes. It's a fantastic amplifier if you don't need full legal limit. 73, Barry N1EU _____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00152.html (7,894 bytes)

103. Re: [TenTec] Mics (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:42:09 +0000
You can judge your audio much better if you're not talking while you're listening. That's why it should be recorded either by you or by another station and then played back. 73, Barry N1EU __________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00160.html (8,066 bytes)

104. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews?-Follow up (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:09:36 +0000
And cw too, eh John? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00181.html (8,516 bytes)

105. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:01:55 -0500
I must confess that I also prefer that the s meter resting point not move upwards with decreasing RF Gain. It's not a huge deal with me, however. I can't imagine setting RF Gain using an s meter - I'
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00286.html (7,949 bytes)

106. Re: [TenTec] Paragon mic (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:23:04 -0500
I've got a spare Shure 444 mic if anybody's interested. Please drop me an email off-list. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00469.html (7,404 bytes)

107. Re: [TenTec] Orion II RTTY Problem (Fixed) (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:07:09 -0500
Wow, my market monitoring web-bot just reported a $200 rise in the going price of a used Orion I in the past 48 hours - keep those firmware updates coming! 73, Barry N1EU ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00582.html (8,145 bytes)

108. Re: [TenTec] Help with New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:12:49 -0500
A simple, brilliant statement! It ain't magic there under the hood. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00584.html (7,872 bytes)

109. Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.054 Notes (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:56:26 +0000
Do you know about the requirement to use a high pass filter between the Orion and Acom 2000A? http://www.rfsquared.com/cms-files/Acom-Orion%20Note.html 73, Barry N1EU ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00631.html (10,401 bytes)

110. Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.054 Notes (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:37:19 +0000
Nope, high pass filter with low cutoff (1.7Mhz) 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00640.html (7,841 bytes)

111. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:16:02 -0500
Huh? Your speech processor only goes down to 10wpm? That's pretty slow talking. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00643.html (6,965 bytes)

112. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2 Beta (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:46:21 -0500
There appears to be a significant difference in the SP firmware for OI and OII at this moment. Hopefully the OI will get fixed soon. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00659.html (8,170 bytes)

113. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.054 update - comments (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:01:06 -0500
Indeed. Why not be able to set an option that along with BW/PBT, have the mode/step/rate/agc to track between receivers? What I do in practice is set up both vfo/receivers for cw and store as User1 a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00663.html (7,752 bytes)

114. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC OMNI VI RECEIVE AUDIO MOD (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:35:25 +0000
http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00399.html _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00910.html (8,328 bytes)

115. Re: [TenTec] Orion II wannabe (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:06:47 +0000
I've never owned a MkV, but that sure doesn't sound normal to me. Sounds like your noise blanker is stuck on or maybe something else. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00946.html (8,072 bytes)

116. Re: [TenTec] QST AD (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 03:47:24 +0000
I find the reviews do nothing to accurately characterize or measure the AGC and QSK performance, two of the most important contributors to my potential love or disdain of a transceiver. 73, Barry N1E
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01022.html (7,457 bytes)

117. Re: [TenTec] Triton IV Digital "options?" (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:44:20 -0500
That seems the gamut of internal options. External options were aux vfo, 160M transverter, and ps with VOX. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@c
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01130.html (8,423 bytes)

118. [TenTec] LSB PBT in v2.055 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:45:30 +0000
Be aware that PBT is still working backwards in the subreceiver in LSB mode in v2.055. This bug was not corrected from v2.054. If you plan on operating the lowbands in this weekend's ssb contest, you
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00030.html (6,841 bytes)

119. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:27:42 -0500
The choices were Pro3 or Orion. FWIW, Mk V Field is not in the same league. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00065.html (7,395 bytes)

120. Re: [TenTec] Which one ? PRO III or Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:47:30 -0500
Not to mention its superb AGC action in cw. Not only is it able to make all diverse signals sound as one, but it gives you an extra 200msec to prepare after transmitting in qsk or after a static burs
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00074.html (7,340 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu