Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:barry.n1eu@gmail.com: 1936 ]

Total 1936 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] AM Receiver distortion in Orion II, (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:59:07 -0500
Sorry, but it makes no sense to me to attribute these audio qualities to the DSP word length. CD's use 16-bit sampling and don't sound "grungy". 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00731.html (8,230 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] AM Receiver distortion in Orion II, (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:09:18 -0500
Besides, isn't the Orion a 32-bit system anyway? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00732.html (8,411 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] AM Receiver distortion in Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:24:14 +0000
I just ran my v1.373 O1 audio through SpectraPlus. In AM mode, with 6Khz selectivity there is a full 6Khz of audio bandwidth (NOT 3Khz as Paul noted in the O2). On the main receiver, the effect of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00738.html (10,961 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] Orion, V2x with WriteLog (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:11:08 -0500
Natan, I encourage you to give N1MM Logger a try. N1MM himself owned an Orion and the interface is seamless, including full support for vfo-B/subreceiver (not just a useless bandmap like Writelog), s
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00756.html (8,389 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] Orion II key click report (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 03:11:00 +0000
Check the reflector archives - we've beat this horse to death before. Bottom line - set Orion risetime to 8msec to avoid clicks. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00916.html (7,961 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] Orion II key click report -- Thank you (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:39:47 -0500
This is great news, but why is the Orion still shipping with default settings that generate keyclicks? This issue was brought up quite some time ago by numerous folks and a simple firmware change wou
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00921.html (7,833 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] Orion/O2 Drift Problem-who is interested in a fix? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:06:37 -0500
Not too interested in (and never really noticed) 20hz drift. Would be more interested in Inrad mods to beef up the subreceiver, which is almost useless on a crowded band with strong signals. 73, Barr
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00947.html (7,991 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] Centurion amp (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:19:04 -0500
Absolutely 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00002.html (7,326 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] Raspy CW (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:11:42 +0000
Nope, revert to 1.373b5 as K4IA suggested and go back to the future. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00232.html (7,592 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] Orion Ergonomics, Key Clicks, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:00:53 -0500
I resoundingly agree with the ergonomics sentiments (regrets) of the Orion. It is SOOO frustrating to change bands and have some utterly absurd settings get restored from "who knows where". This is c
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00212.html (8,787 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] Orion Ergonomics, Key Clicks, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 07:04:51 -0500
When you push a band button once, why aren't the the most recent frequency/mode/bw/etc settings previously used on that band recalled? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ T
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00233.html (10,428 bytes)

252. [TenTec] Orion default BW by mode (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:14:15 +0000
This issue might have been discussed previously, but perhaps someone can refresh my memory. When I change my Orion's mode from USB to LSB or vice versa, I see the BW jump from 2400hz to 6000hz. Why?
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00559.html (7,504 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII results (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:46:40 -0400
I can just see it. Super rare dxpedition is on the air - for $25 you can work them remotely through my mountaintop Omni VII superstation with stacked monobanders - all major credit cards accepted. 73
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00677.html (7,482 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] Remote rig operations (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:45:05 -0400
I can see it now - time share remote QTH's! 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-03/msg00708.html (8,241 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] Orion l 565 Firmware (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:58:42 -0400
Tony, many prefer 1.373b5 over 2.059d and vice versa. You should definitely try both and form your own opinion, because it will vary based on your operating condx. I've listed some of the relevant is
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00316.html (7,819 bytes)

256. [TenTec] Orion I v2 subreceiver filter blow-by (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:31:07 +0000
I'm curious - do any other Orion owners use their subreceiver on cw and notice the filter blow-by w v2 firmware, as in high pitched rendering of strong UCW signals 2.5-5Khz above their fundamental? I
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00478.html (7,430 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.060b Receive Audio levels down quite a bit (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:00:29 +0000
Wasn't it about the same with v2.059 (i.e., it was a problem and still is)? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00486.html (8,351 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2.060b Receive Audio levels down quite a bit (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:54:10 -0400
This discussion is about the Orion I (v2.060b), not the Orion II. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00494.html (8,601 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Orion I v2 subreceiver filter blow-by (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 01:11:29 +0000
I believe this is an issue with the rewritten dsp filtering algorithms in all the O1 v2 firmware versions. The filter blowby/sidelobe problem ALSO exists in the main receiver. However, it's masked in
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00562.html (8,561 bytes)

260. [TenTec] v2.060 QSK (score: 1)
Author: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:38:27 +0000
Some folks have reported an improvement in QSK performance on the O1 v2.060. It's quite possible this is true in the main receiver. However, I am definitely observing a significant deterioration of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00569.html (7,175 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu