Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bbowers@townsqr.com: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:37:55 -0600
While I have to admit, many of us got a little carried away with the political parts of this message, one has to wonder why someone would start out political, then state that the political had no pl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00412.html (10,353 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 14:44:43 -0600
That is what has happened. The business was sold. One plant has been shut down, another is still in operation, and they are moving some equipment from the shut down plant. __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00413.html (9,455 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Commercial towers (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 18:46:07 -0600
Ok, lets make a deal.... I work with a number of commercial towers, located in MO, KY, IN, OK, AR, KS. We need site cleanup, HAMS need tower space. I am willing to offer at most sites, a swap for thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00432.html (7,132 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Tram (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:35:05 -0600
Not sure I follow.. You used a pickup truck to pull a rope, which was used for pulling up antennas on a tower? except the at any Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00588.html (9,765 bytes)

5. Fw: [TowerTalk] Tram (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:09:22 -0600
I have forwarded this to the list, it has some serious safety concerns. I cannot stress how dangerous this is. There are a world of issues with this, and practices like this have killed many in the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00590.html (8,737 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Tram w/Truck (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:42:49 -0600
this tell I did not see that earlier.. But.... Some may think juggling hand grenades is "safe" if they do it a lot. Probably not any safer, just luck. People die using vehicles to hoist loads. It is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00597.html (9,499 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tram w/Truck (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:06:20 -0600
for. Exactly my point. People who "do it all the time" KNOW BETTER than to use a truck, car, etc for lifting. There are of course some exceptions, some companies as I pointed out, have an express di
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00605.html (9,518 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Naked Chick (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:16:05 -0600
With all the uh... Comments about naked chicks, I thought I would forward this link. If you are prudish, just walk on. If you are going to complain about it, what are you doing looking, when I clearl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00460.html (6,868 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Look at his response (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:57:12 -0600
With the fact that there are so few young hams out there in this dying hobby, the chances are fairly slim all of your scenario will come to pass. But, for the ones that ARE out there, if they did not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00484.html (8,333 bytes)

10. Re: *****SPAM**** [TowerTalk] Rohn website (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:45:30 -0600
know Rohn has troubles so maybe they no longer support the site. I can bring up the home page but nothing else works. Site works fine here, and I checked, no naked chics either! _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00488.html (7,502 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Free HDX-555 tower, KT36XA & M2 rotor - a sweet deal! (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 10:50:52 -0600
I won't make you beg, but all the ones I am giving away right now are in the midwest.... Dayton MO, Aaron MO, Chelsea OK, etc... _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00198.html (8,036 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Free HDX-555 tower, KT36XA & M2 rotor - a sweet deal! (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:41:30 -0600
Due to the flood of emails, here are the particulars. These towers are large. 200-300 feet tall, 4 to 5 foot face, angle Grasis towers, with 6 microwave dishes, heliax, etc. The story recently posted
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00200.html (8,689 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower VS aeroplane suit dropped.... (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:09:28 -0500
Unless, of course you are near an airport, or glideslope. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00630.html (7,992 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower safety gear (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 19:32:39 -0500
A simple lineman belt? I wonder what the liabilty is for suggesting that someone do something that can kill them.... _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00473.html (7,634 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower safety gear (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 12:07:48 -0500
There are scads of things that the industry did back in the 80's, that have been proven time after time to be very unsafe. Using linemans belts, riding the line, hoisting with a vehicle, are just som
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00497.html (9,188 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Belts/Harness legality (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:05:19 -0500
way to go, I'd not make sense if on the individual Sure, makes sense. No need to do it as well as the better trained, better qualifed professionals, seeing as you only do it once a year. With that k
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00560.html (8,196 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Erections (TWR) (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:08:51 -0500
Espically from a liabilty thought..... Would it not be smarter just to use exactly what the engineers who designed the tower specify? place or nuts that any Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00440.html (11,550 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:11:49 -0500
Of course the question begs to be asked, why did you reply to the list? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00538.html (6,962 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:45:07 -0500
Most of the carriers are doing an overbuild to add digital capability, and are doing that overbuild at capacity. The old lines used for the analog system will be pulled in many cases when the analog
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00738.html (8,888 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Hardline from obsolete analog cellular sites (?) (score: 1)
Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:21:04 -0500
How will your employer handle FCC mandates? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00752.html (8,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu