Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bill.n3xl@verizon.net: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] BARTG 75 RTTY Sprint? (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Jeff, My take so far is to just chg baud rate from 45 to 75. I saw something awhile back on this subject saying to use 7 bits bit length, but that must have been just talk. At the time I saw it I
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00079.html (8,714 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 90, Issue 36 (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Actually, I think doing away with power categories makes a lot of sense. As mentioned there are many other factors that make for an un-level playing field and they are usually ignored for the sake of
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00268.html (23,273 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 07:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
I like the knowledgeable debating over controversial issues. Real information can be found by reading it. A few poorly chosen words in the heat of debate don't bother me at all. People need to realiz
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00318.html (29,694 bytes)

4. [RTTY] Problem with MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Allan, Make sure your squelch isn't too high. 73, Bill N3XL Send RTTY mailing list submissions to rtty@contesting.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00095.html (11,670 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:17:49 -0800 (PST)
I use QRZ, but in looking at the meaning of Q signals, I probably should use QRV - "I'm ready to receive", after my TU. Do you think QRV instead of QRZ would confuse people while I'm running? I don't
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00218.html (10,764 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Well Tony, I'm going to change my TU macro from QRZ to QRV just to be technically correct. Then at least people who really know exactly what the Q-signals mean will send me their call right away inst
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00289.html (11,627 bytes)

7. [RTTY] QRZ to QRV (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:29:39 -0800 (PST)
Well Tony, I'm going to change my TU macro from QRZ to QRV just to be technically correct. Then at least people who really know exactly what the Q-signals mean will send me their call right away inst
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00297.html (10,008 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:29:17 -0800 (PST)
k4adr, I think that a missing 599 is an example of what happens when people get carried away with trying to use every trick in the book to achieve brevity, then end up with bad operating practices. A
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00309.html (12,915 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] QRZ to QRV (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:23:07 -0800 (PST)
Tom, I really don't mind trying to learn the proper way to do it. I think some Q-signals spice things up a bit - it's certainly easy enough to Google q signals and see the meaning, for the unwary. I
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00333.html (7,944 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Come on, Why bother? (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:09:09 -0800 (PST)
What's wrong with exposing the secrets of successful contesters! hi hi 73, Bill N3XL Whoa.. A BIG "TMI" !! 73's, Todd / W4LA TMI! :-) 73, --Alex KR1ST.com http://www.airlinkexpress.org --Original Mes
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00339.html (9,480 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] CQ or QRZ (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Andy, I have to agree with you. The "we've always done it that way" syndrome isn't really an excuse for even slightly sloppy operating practice. But then, I wouldn't complain about it very much, sinc
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00345.html (10,899 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Shelby, Not knocking 3830, but I don't do soapboxes or use it. By The time I export my files send them to the contest sponsor, PVRC database, eQSL, and LoTW, I am ready to move on to something else b
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00349.html (12,038 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Why send 599 report (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 09:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Russell, 599 is the content of the message. Nice to have SOMETHING in the message besides just a serial number, which can be considered as message originator's serial number. I agree that 599 is symb
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00430.html (7,859 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] DOS computer for improved RTTY reception? (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Anyone, Is that K6STI RITTY software still $100 a copy? I would like to play with it if it's free now! 73, Bill N3XL Hi Rick, I'm really interested in your concept of using a DOS computer for RTTY re
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00641.html (8,559 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] RITTY (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Rick, What sites? You saw something I didn't find when I googled. 73, Bill N3XL There are some sites with free older versions Google it Rick, N6PE == You're never too old to learn something stupid. _
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00658.html (6,616 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] BARTG COMMENTS (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:46:50 -0800 (PST)
I have also noticed that several operators were in too big of a hurry. As a consequence, they need to be aware that they are missing out on confirmed QSOs. Crowded and/or degraded band conditions, as
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00713.html (11,047 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu