Mail Archive Search: <+from:brazos@rochester.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:brazos@rochester.rr.com: 370 ]

Total 370 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] warming up of tubes (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:38:53 -0500; thanks Pete I tried to find it in the manual last night but couldn't John -- Original Message -- From: <ac5e@comcast.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:24 PM Subjec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00711.html (7,738 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] warming up of tubes (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:36:34 -0500; Thanks to all who replied , I have been doing exactly that , what a great amplifier ! now I have a new dummy load I am gonna have to learn good operation proceedure with that. thanks all John -- Orig; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00715.html (9,107 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] RE: Orion Expanded Report (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:17:58 -0500; I know the Jupiter may not be a contest radio but where would the Jupiter fall in among these radios ? john -- Original Message -- From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu> To: "Tracy, Michael, KC; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00884.html (11,179 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter Tested in January RadCom (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 10:54:44 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00916.html (8,507 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] Merry Christmas (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:57:51 -0500; who reflector _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00947.html (7,769 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni 6+ Video (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:53:23 -0500; Hi Jeff , Happy Holidays ! I wanted you to know I got the tape back . What did you think about this tape compared to the new one out ? Was there a lot of requests for the video ? thanks John -- Origi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01299.html (8,530 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni 6+ Video (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:58:19 -0500; Hi Jeff ! I finally got the video to work , you did a great Job putting the TT video on the web site . thanks John -- Original Message -- From: "Jeff Kelly" <jkelly@bellatlantic.net> To: <tentec@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01319.html (8,887 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Have I missed a review of the Jupiter ? (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:09:40 -0500; Hello all ! Have I missed a review of the Jupiter ? Does anyone know if the Jup will be discontinued along with the Peg ? I have heard of now updates or improvements from anyone and I am wondering if; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00496.html (7,354 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:52:14 -0500; So are you saying that we should keep the AGC on slow when using a narrow bandwith or noise reduction ? to prevent A/D overload ? John -- Original Message -- From: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00895.html (8,893 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec is not being sold. (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:12:43 -0500; Thank God Scott, If such a company like MFJ ( mighty fine junk ) were to buy out you guys I would have to turn away from anything made by the new company . I just wanted you to know on how I and many; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00016.html (9,439 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec is not being sold. (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:16:24 -0500; I Agree 100 percent ! MFJ would be the last company I would buy from ........Mighty Fine Junk John -- Original Message -- From: <CROCDONZ1@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, February; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00017.html (7,579 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] Off Topic - Time (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:34:17 -0500; I sometimes wonder why some of us are so hard and rude to other folks expression , I often wonder if these rough and tough opninoated guys on the list would speak out at a social gathering or face to; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00053.html (9,423 bytes)
53. [TenTec] where is the net today ? (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 16:59:14 -0500; Is the net today ? if so where ? thanks John _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00680.html (7,082 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:53:25 -0500; Hello , I had a 746 not a pro and did everything I could to improve the rx audio and had no luck . I ended up trading my icom for my jupiter and I got beauriful rx audio much better selectivity ( I h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00712.html (9,249 bytes)
55. [TenTec] Jupiter and KENWOOD SM-220 STATION (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:38:03 -0500; Hi , Does anyone use a KENWOOD SM-220 STATION monitor with the Jupiter ? does anyone know if you can use the kenwood station monitor with the jupiter ? thanks John ___________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00732.html (6,748 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter and KENWOOD SM-220 STATION (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:23:52 -0500; Thanks for the time all took to respond to my question concerning my Jupiter and the sm - 220 station monitor . I thought the station monitor would be a good tool , but this one seems to be the wrong; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00749.html (8,885 bytes)
57. [TenTec] off topic tuner tuner (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:28:06 -0500; I am looking at the palomar tuner tuner to put between my Jupiter and centurion has anyone used this piece of equipment ? does it work ? thanks John kb2huk ___________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00891.html (6,982 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] off topic tuner tuner (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 21:14:38 -0500; Yup you are correct , I want to tune my nye viking and my centurion , jupiter with out transmitting . thanks I will check out the other guys John -- Original Message -- From: "Chuck (Jack) Hawley" <c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00898.html (8,986 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] off topic tuner tuner (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:42:36 -0500; Thanks to all who responded concerning the use of the "Tuner Tuner " John kb2huk -- Original Message -- From: <ac5e@comcast.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 7:04 AM; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00945.html (8,741 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Plate amperes ? (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:11:04 -0500; Hi all ! I have a ten tec centurion and I need to know what value should I keep the plate ampers on for good operation . I can not find a mention of this in the manaul . thanks John _________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00011.html (6,853 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]