Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:brent.zook@verizon.net: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec PA design (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:52:32 -0400
I too would go in for a breaker for the Orion. --N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00430.html (8,061 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] What version? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:24:23 -0400
I use version 1.372. I don't care for the problems mentioned ad nauseum on this site which are associated with Version 2, though version 2 seems more stable. And in version 1.373, I notice that the a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-07/msg00587.html (7,566 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Why I love Ten-Tec (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:11:04 -0400
Thanks for reporting Jack's comment on the agc loop problem, Bill. That should quiet us down for awhile. -Brent N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contest
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00342.html (7,391 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] V1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:51:56 -0400
Mark, the roofing filters on 1.373b5 or b3 don't kick in at the same place relative to the dsp bandwidth filter as they do in 1.372. In 1.372 the bandwidth of the roofing filters kicks in when the ds
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00803.html (8,093 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Audio Outputs Different V2.059 ? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:00:56 -0400
I heard about the new software for the Orion I while working the TN qso party. Heard an exchange where one station turned on and off his speech processor. While I thought his audio sounded great and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00264.html (7,901 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] 2.059d: BinRx still broken (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:12:59 -0400
BinRx still working on my Orion I with 2.059. Could really use a 'Balance" control though, and that is true of all the firmware versions. --N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00313.html (7,834 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] orion 565 v2.056 bandstacking? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:30:21 -0400
My experience is that the bandstacking registers will work with both vfo A and B, and the same freq in the bandstack will be put into whichever vfo you select. To select vfo B, you need to press and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00632.html (7,551 bytes)

28. [TenTec] RTTY OMNI D (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 09:46:29 -0400
I thought my reply may be useful to others, so I have sent it to the listserve. Dave, it has been since the late 70s and early 80s but I used to run rtty on an omni D (which I still have). I don't kn
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00283.html (7,490 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] OT: Antenna Problem (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:19:01 -0500
You have ice there? That can cause a crazy difference. Need 1.5 Kilowatt to burn it off. --n9hz _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00540.html (8,264 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Orion I and sub-receiver (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:02:25 -0500
John, I have noticed the same problem as you... sometimes the Orion 565's subreceiver will not tune after being locked on a frequency. I don't know what does it, but it also happens with V1 software.
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00765.html (7,036 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Orion (I) and Alpha 91b using QSK 5 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:39:26 -0500
John, I use that exact pair at my place. Just use the regular "amp out" to connect with the relay in the amp. You can set your relay delay in the Orion to the very minimum possible. The 91b handles i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00214.html (7,367 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Version 2.060b for Orion Classic (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:10:41 -0400
Finally! A version 2 program that works like it should. I know there are some grumblings, but this is the first version that I've tried that seemed mature, as in age 21 or so. It is what I expected w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00604.html (7,426 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Band Stacking Registers - 2.038k (2.060b originalorion) (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 17:58:23 -0400
That happens with the original orion also. I think this is a feature, not a bug. If you are running cw on 80 in memory A, then you can switch to 40, 20, etc and still be in memory A, presupposing you
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00072.html (9,436 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Fix for v2.060b Sidetone Artifact (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 09:46:55 -0400
Yes this is great news. Lets all hope and pray that the rest of the code works as well as it does now! --brent N9HZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00154.html (7,181 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Orion 1 sub-receiver (score: 1)
Author: "R. Brent Zook" <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:35:40 -0400
G.C., I have had similar things happen, and in my case, I believe it to be the buttons on the left side of the rig, those being the antenna/rx/tx assignment buttons. It has always straitghtened out w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00363.html (7,087 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] AGC Threshold, RF Gain, Volume (score: 1)
Author: <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:24:26 -0500 (CDT)
Interesting subject. I switched back to 1.372 for the original Orion, which seems more stable than 1.737b(5). Since tentec found and replaced a bad relay I have had NO hangups, no firmware bugs bothe
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00242.html (11,407 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] OT: coax versus parallel wire, insulated wire for aerial (score: 1)
Author: <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 08:14:29 -0500 (CDT)
My question goes to the practical. Say we are using some version of RG8U; isn't it better to choke the feedline at both ends? And what are the cheapest but best toroids or beads to use? Where do you
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00181.html (8,623 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Orion2 USER1/2 etc (score: 1)
Author: <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:33:13 -0500 (CDT)
The User1 User2 (and 3 and 4 if you look at the manual) are not going to evaporate when the rig is turned off. That would defeat the purpose of the buttons. If your settings are disappearing, you may
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00011.html (8,299 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] OT: SWR & Coax (score: 1)
Author: <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:45:45 -0500 (CDT)
To K9YC: I appreciate all the useful information you add to the group. And I mean no offense. But tact can help. My stepson Danny went to work at an RV/manuf. housing place and soon was running the d
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00137.html (10,951 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] ORION II TX gone (score: 1)
Author: <brent.zook@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:53:45 -0500 (CDT)
I had the same problem, only with the Orion I. It was somewhat intermittent, but once it started happening it quickly turned permanent...was a relay. For some reason the power out on the meter on the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00407.html (9,236 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu