Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RFI] 160 Meter Interference (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:53:51 -0400
I suddenly have a neighbor who seems to be generating a strong birdie similar to that posted. I've narrowed it down to the exact house and contacted the owner who is willing to let me inside to ident
/archives//html/RFI/2004-10/msg00036.html (9,735 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] 160 Meter Interference (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:00:40 -0400
This one costs much less $4.97) and has the same 40 dB noise rejection as the other two. Anyone have any experience with these? 73, Bill W4ZV http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?MSCSProfile=745D84C
/archives//html/RFI/2004-10/msg00037.html (8,617 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] [BULK] Re: Ambient Noise Levels (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:41:55 -0400
W8JI: Barnesville or Forsyth during the daytime on my 160 transmitting verticals. Beaming south or north away from both Barnesville (7 miles to the west) and Forsyth (7 miles east), noise is 10dB les
/archives//html/RFI/2006-08/msg00022.html (7,988 bytes)

4. [RFI] Testing & Comparing Compact Fluorescents? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:32:16 -0400
WD3Q: equivalent seems to be quiet. The n:vision 75 watt equivalent was *very* noisy to my ear (never turned on a radio) when I turned it on. http://www.eham.net/articles/16365 Does anyone know where
/archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00115.html (7,529 bytes)

5. [RFI] Testing & Comparing Compact Fluorescents? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:49:25 -0400
Repeat of October 21 post. Hello ARRL...anybody home? 73, Bill W4ZV WD3Q: equivalent seems to be quiet. The n:vision 75 watt equivalent was *very* noisy to my ear (never turned on a radio) when I tur
/archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00144.html (7,961 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Testing & Comparing Compact Fluorescents? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:28:23 -0400
N3OX replied: of interference in anywhere near your house ;-) Correct on both counts Dan. My standard test is to use the Sony 2010 with whip antenna to locate noise sources within my house. If I get
/archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00147.html (8,911 bytes)

7. [RFI] Testing & Comparing Compact Fluorescents? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:42:19 -0400
N6PE: pair or all four on. I think there may be significant differences both in CFLs and in the noise levels different people consider objectionable. the display on my old 940S. I just checked my TS-
/archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00148.html (8,502 bytes)

8. [RFI] Fwd: Testing & Comparing Compact Fluorescents? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:20:27 -0400
More info from Ed W1RFI and my apologies to Mike W1MG for getting his call wrong (W1MB) in my previous post. 73, Bill W4ZV We did get a report from a member who found that when the put the bulbs into
/archives//html/RFI/2007-10/msg00151.html (13,451 bytes)

9. [RFI] Computer RFI on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:40:52 -0400
In 2004 I had a problem with a neighbor's PC birdie drifting onto the Chesterfield Island (TX9) expedition frequency. Fortunately it was a new "white box" computer assembled by a local company and I
/archives//html/RFI/2008-10/msg00076.html (7,972 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu