- 1. [Amps] resistors (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:55:23 -0400
- Does anyone on the list know what became of the " mitsubishi" resistor line.These were metal oxide film if I recall correctly.!! I have used up what I had in some amps I've been working on . What I h
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00094.html (6,344 bytes)
- 2. [Amps] resistors (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:11:25 -0400
- Thanks for your responses ,guys. My memory failed me on the name of these things. It's Matsushita , not Mitsubishi , wow , what a blunder!!! thanks for the info and I'll go to the 'net and check Digi
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00096.html (6,403 bytes)
- 3. [Amps] meter (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:33:13 -0400
- Is there anyone who might have a burned out or useless meter for an SB200 ,or 220, that might have a good faceplate, IE: the plastic cover for the meter. ??? I have a friend who needs one: I sent him
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00098.html (6,183 bytes)
- 4. [Amps] meter face (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:31:20 -0400
- To all on amps. I have been informed that the meter on the heathkit hm102 is the the same meter so that's another place to look!!!! Thanks again !!!!! carl / kz5ca ( it's likely that all heathkit met
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00101.html (6,179 bytes)
- 5. [Amps] suppliers (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:52:45 -0400
- I don't know about the rest of you guys, but In trying to make sense of Digi-key's website I am at the end of the rope. Mouser's site is so much better, BUT, they don't have what I want in every case
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00113.html (7,026 bytes)
- 6. [Amps] fil. chokes (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:31:45 -0400
- I have wound several experimental filament chokes for an SB200 and All Are somewhat larger in value than the original. The last one I just made is 48.5 uh. Is there any problem in using a larger chok
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00123.html (6,356 bytes)
- 7. [Amps] relays (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:16:12 -0400
- Would someone care to explain to me these relay nos.?? wiw. w2w, etc. Thanks !!!! carl / kz5ca P.S. I've never received the first comment on my previous question on Fil. chokes ,So I have to wonder i
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00158.html (6,136 bytes)
- 8. [Amps] Chokes (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:53:25 -0400
- I have been informed that my question about Fil. chokes never appeared on this list, Why, I have no idea.!! I've been on this list for a "long" time now , and some of the "best" have been "banned: fo
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00159.html (6,311 bytes)
- 9. [Amps] SB200 (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:27:37 -0400
- I* thought I was so smart, (til now) I have always managed to tame any SB200, but this one is exceptional. I know, Iv'e been down this road before, but This time I'm stumped (again) This amp is very
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-06/msg00181.html (6,318 bytes)
- 10. [Amps] tubes (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 08:23:35 -0400
- did Amperex make a 572B/T160L ?? just wondering c.s. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00004.html (5,925 bytes)
- 11. [Amps] tubes (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:33:33 -0400
- I want to believe that in the "earlier" times , there were not too many mfrs.!! of any one type of tube. Insofar as the 572B was concerned, the earliest I can remember was the Taylor company. !! I kn
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00018.html (6,705 bytes)
- 12. [Amps] tubes?? (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:39:11 -0400
- Can anyone tell me If the so'called date codes on the tubes From china are really the correct codes , as we used to know them in this country ??? Or they some contrived sh-t for our dumber buyers????
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00019.html (6,114 bytes)
- 13. [Amps] tubes (score: 1)
- Author: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:47:34 -0400
- Much has been said about Richardson's cornering the tube market in the U.S. I have often wondered about this and about the possible politics involved. It would seem to go against the rules insofar as
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00033.html (6,833 bytes)
- 14. [Amps] suppressors (score: 1)
- Author: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:43:04 -0400
- There has been , in the past, much discussion about parasitic suppressors in this list.!! What I'd like to see is a comparison between the "nichrome" and the " copper" wire suppressors , in actual us
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00199.html (6,426 bytes)
- 15. [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:38:34 -0400
- over to the new compact electronic fluorescent globes.So far,so good.I have an idea that the higher voltage creates higher electricity bills. 73....Bob..VK3ZL.. Of course it does!!! Do you think the
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00407.html (6,582 bytes)
- 16. [Amps] amps? (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:59:18 -0400
- So why hasnt a tech bulletin been released and a resistor added to current production? It seems a dumb and irresponsible thing to not do it. see above!!~!! Does ANYONE here believe that the MFR.of An
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00410.html (6,484 bytes)
- 17. [Amps] cabinets (score: 1)
- Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:54:21 -0400
- I have a cabinet for the SB series receivers , which I would like to exchange for a cabinet for an SB200 amp. !!!The two are almost alike except the rec. cabinet doesn't open on top.!! Anyone got one
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00005.html (6,399 bytes)
- 18. [Amps] Heathkit cabinets (score: 1)
- Author: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:40:56 -0400
- A while back I asked about "SB "series cabinets, as I would like to get the right one for an SB200. It appears there are(were) two different types of cabinets , "same size" one with a hinged lid , on
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00161.html (6,392 bytes)
- 19. [Amps] sb cabinets (score: 1)
- Author: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:27:30 -0400
- It appears that , from all my answers to the SBxxx cabinet questions, that the "only" SB units were the SB -303 and the SB310 to use the "solid" cabinets.!!!! All the rest seem to hasve used the "hin
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-08/msg00213.html (6,396 bytes)
- 20. Re: [Amps] AMP AD (score: 1)
- Author: "c.s." <carlseye@verizon.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:51:26 -0400
- I have an answer for this , but it would not likely pass inspection by even an Idiot.!!! (too dirty) carl _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-09/msg00084.html (7,386 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu