Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] DUAL CONVERSION (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:51:54 -0500
Correct and the accepted definition of Dual Conversion in the world of Superhetrodyne receiver design would be a radio with two distinct RF frequency IF's before detection or demodulation to audio. C
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00172.html (13,410 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] new rx in Orion II (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:31:06 -0500
I don't believe the spectrum display works on the sub receiver. I think that is a hardware thing....it probably won't ever work in the Sub receiver..at least not in the OII. Just my best guess though
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00218.html (7,626 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---Spectrum Display &Tuning dot (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 20:30:18 -0500
Not sure what version you updated from. I haven't seen that little dot on mine (2.044) but recently updated to 3.029. Dot sounds like a nice idea because with the display freezing it is hard to tell
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00247.html (9,984 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029 ---SpectrumDisplay &Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 07:48:55 -0500
Thanks for the input Ray.. I continue to try different settings but the 20hz has worked well for me also. Seems the biggest player is the RF gain setting as well.. It seems to determine the depth the
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00255.html (9,327 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029---SpectrumDisplay &Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:29:53 -0500
It depends on what you are doing with the radio... Chasing DX at the noise level it's a feature mostly only high end radio's have. Many don't work well but those that are implemented properly make a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00300.html (11,432 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029---SpectrumDisplay&Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:17:46 -0500
Bob something is missing here for sure. If I do exactly what you say my "S" meter does not react the same. That is on my Orion II with the latest firmware and with the earler 2.044 and also my Omni V
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00309.html (17,645 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 566 Orion II Firmware Version V3.029---SpectrumDisplay&Tuning... (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:54:16 -0500
I agree...I'm finding it crazy that the claims that the OII does not work that way is being brushed aside as us just not understanding. I've been a component level tech for nearly 40 years...I fix th
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00322.html (21,018 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC Community (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:00:16 -0500
Depends on the camera used but one technique on digital cameras is to point the camera down into the darker areas of the station and depress the shoot button to the first detent then reframe the pict
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00343.html (9,906 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware Version V3.029--unresolved issue(s) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 15:19:40 -0500
I second that motion... There are lots of things to love about the OII but the spectrum display is not one of them. If you have never had a radio with that function if does add a bit of awareness but
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00382.html (11,083 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 07:53:17 -0500
Sorry changed the subject line since the subject has changed... This comes at a time when I am trying to make sense of some problems with my station. I'm a recent Ten-Tec convert having bought a used
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00092.html (12,369 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 11:53:33 -0500
_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00110.html (9,909 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 12:29:16 -0500
One TV in question is stand alone..no external speakers. Tuning the station will cause that TV to switch on and then you can't turn it off without unplugging it and letting it sit for a while. My mod
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00111.html (20,556 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Transmitter specs (was Top receivers) (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:06:12 -0500
It's the central point of everything. The ICE AC power protection is mounted on it as well so it's ground is referenced at that point supplying all equipment in the console. The chassis of each piece
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00124.html (12,304 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:08:32 -0500
I agree with you Jim, I certainly want my signal to be the best it can be with the equipment I have. And if some part of the problem is op error then I want to fix it. That's why my sudden concern ab
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00127.html (9,536 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:13:32 -0500
Just my 2 cents worth.... Your grounding work shouldn't start just outside the wall from the radio gear...it really should start at the tower and be an antenna/tower grounding "System" designed to st
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00292.html (14,227 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] 425 value? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:50:57 -0500
Our club bought a used one recently for some club station contesting. Paid $1800. I tested it recently for the club and it worked fine. 85 watts in 1700 out into my dummy load.. Nice old amp. Cecil K
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00303.html (7,795 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 07:37:15 -0500
That's why I am concerned about guys that drive 3 ground rods at the base of their tower and expect it will be good enough. Mine has been struck 3 times in the last year and the net result was the lo
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00309.html (10,545 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:17:38 -0500
Might want to do the same inquery on the Hex Beam. I've heard it's a great expedition asset but not so much for a permanent station installation. (out performed easily by other basic yagis) No person
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00358.html (9,309 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] OT Use of external keyer with Omni [hexbeam/directional arrays] (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 12:56:54 -0500
I agree... I do see many love the antenna especially for restricted/limited installation locations. Cecil... -- Original Message -- From: "Gene Story - Earthlink" <gfstory@earthlink.net> To: "Discuss
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00362.html (15,856 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] rx 366 (score: 1)
Author: "chacuff" <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:31:09 -0500
That's what I keep a Drake R8B around for...Neither the old RX or the new one will work as well. Cecil K5DL -- Original Message -- From: <kc9cdt@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, Jun
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00038.html (10,606 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu