Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:clive@gw3njw.org: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [CQ-Contest] Sept/Oct NCJ article on DX Prowess of Receivers (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive@gw3njw.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 18:31:43 -0000
A couple of comments from a self proclaimed non-techie, although equally a self professed critical user of receivers in contests over more years than I care to articulate here! a. Unless you have an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00003.html (11,137 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] Two Radio Sprint QSOs (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive@gw3njw.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:52:54 -0000
<<About the only way I can think of to change back to something more close to the "old way it was done" would be to distinguish S&P and CQ QSOs, and require them to be in balance at the end of the co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-09/msg00152.html (8,115 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] PTT control SO2R CW (was: Portable contest rigs) (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive@gw3njw.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:25:45 -0000
<My personal opinion is that an SO2R CW contest stations built around PTT control of station equipment violates the KISS rule and is an overall handicap to a serious single op contest operation.> My
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00140.html (8,378 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZIP CODE CONTEST (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive@gw3njw.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:03:18 -0000
Bill Already exists, and has for many years. Check http://www.contesting.co.uk/hfcc/rules/rropoco.shtml . Has a twist in the tail! 73 Clive GW3NJW --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00343.html (7,975 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu