Mail Archive Search: <+from:clive.whelan@btinternet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:clive.whelan@btinternet.com: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:22:36 -0000; Caveat, the 870 will still expeience IMD3 problems, in very crowded band conditions wih mega lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00333.html (9,774 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:22:36 -0000; Caveat, the 870 will still experience IMD3 problems, in very crowded band conditions with mega; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00334.html (9,912 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:27 -0000; I pay for QST via my ARRL sub., but it doesn't publish its own contest ( or even IARU) results in any detail; which other national society fails to do that? I pay for CQ magazine and it does. Sure, i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00568.html (8,545 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Everyone uses CT (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 23:31:22 -0000; <PS: I think I have decided to write a windows version of TR. However, it will take awhile - I expect about 10 years.> If WL had a mode switch, that would make a hole in the market, but since that se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00699.html (8,803 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:22:36 -0000; Caveat, the 870 will still expeience IMD3 problems, in very crowded band conditions wih mega lo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00922.html (9,774 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 - IC-718 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:22:36 -0000; Caveat, the 870 will still experience IMD3 problems, in very crowded band conditions with mega; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00923.html (9,912 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW results (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:55:27 -0000; I pay for QST via my ARRL sub., but it doesn't publish its own contest ( or even IARU) results in any detail; which other national society fails to do that? I pay for CQ magazine and it does. Sure, i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01157.html (8,545 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] FW: [UK-CONTEST] WPX CW GW3NJW SOSB15 HP (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:45:28 -0000; Hi list Well, I should have been using GW7X in this event ( a unique multiplier), so what happened? I overslept, that's what happened, and made a silly error. Had intended to be in the shack by 0400z; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00406.html (12,609 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bill Windle QSO Party (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 23:05:33 -0000; Well I'll be on 50Mhz, so hope for some sun spots?? I'll also be on 144mHz-oh never mind! 73 Clive GW3NJW Cool! The only difficulty is it's the same day as the ARRL VHF QSO Party. Am I likely to work; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00021.html (8,261 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] ICOM-amp. keying (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:21:00 -0000; Hi list Slightly off topic, but not presently subscribed to an ICOM reflector, so please excuse. I recently acquired an ICOM7400 ( =746PRO in U.S.A.), ostensibly for VHF, but it seems to quite a nice; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00157.html (8,684 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ICOM-amp. keying (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:03:38 -0000; Thanks to all who offered their valuable opinions and work-arounds. In the end I decided to build the circuit found here. http://www.qsl.net/icom/ampcontrol.html which was within a reference kindly p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00188.html (8,495 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] [CHQ-Contest] AA log submission (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:25:24 -0000; It's hopeless. I've been where you are some years ago, when they just threw about 30 hours of my hard work in the bin, because it didn't fit some daft idiosyncratic log format that they had decided s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00308.html (10,630 bytes)
13. RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R with KENWOOD Radios +++ (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:06:00 -0000; Hi Jeff I suspect your problem, is that the dot/dash memories, cannot be disabled, which will make it extremely unforgiving indeed in the circs. you describe. Frankly, having learned to use a single; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00349.html (12,137 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best HF rig under $90 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:54:01 -0000; <If you can find one modified with the PIEXX board, I'd take good old TS930s!> Well I've got one, but you can't have it for USD90, 90Euros, or even GBP90. Come to think of it, you can't even have it; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00308.html (7,563 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] TS-870's (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:01:47 -0000; Snap 'em up PDQ 'cos; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-03/msg00127.html (7,495 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Rules W/VE (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:59:56 -0000; How about publishing the results before changing the rules; carts before horses? 73 Clive GW3NJW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00120.html (7,401 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW DXCC (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:50:52 -0000; <Accepting the fact that your word is not enough of validation of your identity you put your word lower then some piece of paper which lowers your self esteem. This is harder thing to restore if dama; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00333.html (8,962 bytes)
18. [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:03:53 -0000; Since I am very clumsy, and always catching my foot in the headphone cord etc, I have for some time used a pair of ( RF)cordless cans (Sennheiser). These are really first class. Of course in my infre; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00038.html (7,585 bytes)
19. RE: [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:05:48 -0000; Rich is right on both counts. I have also seen several of these telephone type headsets, not really good enough for our demanding purpose. However, better devices definitely do exist, as I have seen; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00454.html (8,229 bytes)
20. RE: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 01:58:05 -0000; Tower?, what tower? Beam?, what beam? Jeez I'd kill for any sort of the above. Wires and verticals don't win contests that's for sure, but that's what the other half use. They are character forming-a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00735.html (8,139 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]