Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cptcurt@flash.net: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Bartg-Sprint logs (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:00:26 -0500
It took a few hours to get a response back confirming receipt. Curt KU8L _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00623.html (8,246 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Bartg-Sprint logs (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:28:35 -0500
Hi John: The question came up last nite within a software testing group (working on a Cabrillo module) as to whether you actually confirm that the files submitted to you are "good" ie no formatting e
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00635.html (11,476 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] EPC WW DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:46:24 -0500
Hi Mike: Tell us what logging/s/w package you used. Thanks Curt KU8L _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00015.html (8,307 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] FMRE (XE) CONTEST (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:16:40 -0500
Hi John: Its not a part of the WL modules..you need to use the third party add-ins. listed as FMRE International RTTY Contest in the New Log Selector Panel. But in the WL files listing inside program
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00024.html (7,659 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] PSK contesting? (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:08:27 -0500
As long as you run XP/Vista or Linux, Fldigi is getting to be real contest worthy--latest alpha versions even have cabrillo output from the log and call grab automation. All PSK modes, CW, RTTY, etc.
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00139.html (7,498 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY RXlmsNotch setting? (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:24:38 -0500
Is there any discussion or background info to go along with these profiles?? What is the history behind them? Thanks Curt KU8L _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@c
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00161.html (7,311 bytes)

7. [RTTY] CQ WPX RTTY - KU8L (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:53:57 -0500
Glad to see a few others running simple antennas and low power. Don't really have any idea if my result is credible or not.. Would like to see a few more results from others using simple rigs..ie man
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00226.html (8,480 bytes)

8. [RTTY] Sent dupe serial numbers (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:44:28 -0500
Newbie question here: Twice during the wpx contest, being new to the run sequence, I got fast-finger and entered the next call without hitting enter for the previous qso in the entry window. Realized
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00228.html (7,826 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Sent dupe serial numbers (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:30:57 -0500
Thanks Susan-- Interesting coincidence--I just posted to the writelog reflector concerning your call! my logger listed it as Desecheo Is!! It had the us W% area correct but the K5D part got it all a-
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00235.html (10,514 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] WPX for me Re: CQWPX RTTY 2009 for K0BX (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:49:01 -0500
Oh Yeah...I must have asked for my NR? three separate times before I figured out that 599 was my number. (Doh!!) I think I finally got it when I looked at the second decoder to see that he had given
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00239.html (8,616 bytes)

11. [RTTY] RF-Interface-soundcard feedback (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:13:48 -0500
Good Afternoon All: I took my linear out of mothballs today in the hopes of gaining a few dB on rtty. The soundcard and interface are creating feedback from the linear so it all becomes unstable and
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00300.html (7,165 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RF-Interface-soundcard feedback (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:44:44 -0500
Some further investigations: Only a problem on 20M. 15 is actually fine. so I'm suspecting the RF on the coax problem Bill suggested. The antenna does have a palomar choke on it at the base of the an
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-02/msg00309.html (10,421 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Frequencies (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:41:37 -0500
Please don't think I am arguing the point here..after being chastised on-air for calling CQ at about 7045 (RTTY) on a very quiet (my end) early evening "in the middle of the ""CW Band""" , I guess I
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00133.html (10,237 bytes)

14. [RTTY] 850 shift rtty on 30M? (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:30:29 -0500
What is the 850 Shift RTTY going on at 10.130.5? Cant get anything to decode it. It is strong and seems to be going on forever without a break like some kind of commercial broadcast. Thanks Curt ____
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00161.html (6,608 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] AFSK Mark Tone 2000 Hz vs. 2125 Hz (score: 1)
Author: curt nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Using a different mark frequency with AFSK has no relationship to being off ffrequency!  Plain and simple fact. . I run 1445 mark and  170 and I challenge you to tell the difference. This sort of non
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00185.html (8,612 bytes)

16. [RTTY] Sprint Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:56:47 -0400
Good Afternoon All: Question regrading rule # 11. in the NA Sprint Rules. "Special QSY Rule" The way I read this, it pretty much eliminates run mode... is this correct or am I reading something in th
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00216.html (7,263 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Sprint Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:16:47 -0400
OK..Thats very interesting...cant wait to try it all out. Means I need to change my macros a little bit. Thnx for the rapid responses to all. Curt KU8L _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00220.html (7,002 bytes)

18. [RTTY] BARTG-RTTY09 (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:47:06 -0400
Greetings All: Again had loads of fun. Decided to do a 6hr contest. Like said before, choice of times became an anquished decision. Worked Sunday from 1900Z for 3hrs mostly on 20M and again Sunday ev
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00328.html (7,394 bytes)

19. [RTTY] Best scramble-up exchanges.... (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:54:50 -0400
I followed K8UT into a contact while we were S&P and I waited while he got his exchange from the other station with NR 067 Then I went in as KU8L and my nr to the other guy was nr 67. There was a lon
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00329.html (6,565 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] K3UK Sked forum LoTW (score: 1)
Author: Curt Nixon <cptcurt@flash.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:23:41 -0400
I will only take you a little while as those states check in with more than one station pretty regularly. Curt KU8L _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2009-03/msg00342.html (7,677 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu