Mail Archive Search: <+from:csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu>

Results:

References: [ +from:csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu: 198 ]

Total 198 documents matching your query.

161. [TenTec] Omni VI Logic Board Rework (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:46:45 -0800 (PST); Just for the sake of mentioning it... I have noticed that the chip with the label (there are two on the board) towards the front, the logic chip, is a focal point for lots of RF. Try putting your fin; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00195.html (7,262 bytes)
162. [TenTec] DeOxit vs Deox-id? (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 14:51:43 -0800 (PST); Anyone out there with experience know if one of these is a better quality product? I understand Ten Tec uses one of them to clean bandswitches, don't know which one. I have used DeOxit before (Caig); /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00018.html (7,539 bytes)
163. [TenTec] Omni C / Corsair Hssssss. (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:28:59 -0800 (PST); (a lot is snipped out) Yes, it would be nice if Ten Tec's audio chain generated less hiss. Contrary to others' experiences, my Japanese Kenwood TS 850 is does not generate hiss in the audio, and cle; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00049.html (9,453 bytes)
164. [TenTec] Omni-C vs. '930; hisssssss (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:22:22 -0800 (PST); I went to check my OMNI-C with RF gain cut back against my Kenmore TS 850 with the RF gain cut back. The OMNI generates significantly more noise from the audio chain than the Kenmore. I used the same; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00068.html (8,024 bytes)
165. [TenTec] Omni Noise (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:58:11 -0800 (PST); Yes, the "zipper" is there with the RF gain all the way down. The gastrointestinal description is perhaps more descriptive :-) . Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Su; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00075.html (7,807 bytes)
166. [TenTec] Omni Noise (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 09:30:16 -0800 (PST); I respect that proviso. Depends on what kind of noise you are talking about. When I referred to the "zipper" noise (from tuning the synthesizer) it sometimes is enough to make it hard to hear station; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00083.html (11,600 bytes)
167. [TenTec] TT filters (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 18:15:53 -0800 (PST); The Corsair II has two filters stock. One is mounted vertically on a small board against a divider towards the right rear looking from the top. The other is in the leftmost position of the PBT board.; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00093.html (7,628 bytes)
168. [TenTec] Omni Noise (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2000 18:20:50 -0800 (PST); This is probably the sound I hear on mine while I spin the dial. I get it on 20 on a quiet night trying to tune for weak signals. I can REALLY hear it on 10 meters FM while tuning around. It is mostl; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00094.html (8,079 bytes)
169. [TenTec] OMNI-C Gain on 160 (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 19:12:48 -0800 (PST); A consequence of the design. I talked at length with Ten Tec about this once or twice, the rig was designed to have lower sensitivity on 160 and 80 is on the tail end of the preamp's range. They figu; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00173.html (7,818 bytes)
170. [TenTec] FS: model 218 SSB filter (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:44:58 -0800 (PST); I have a spare narrow SSB filter (the 1.8 KHz bandwidth) for the 9 MHz IF. I use more CW filters, so I have no need for this filter. It will fit the Argosy, the OMNI (series B and C), OMNI V and VI.; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00187.html (7,053 bytes)
171. [TenTec] OMNI VI FM reception (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:18:41 -0800 (PST); Hi all - Setting up a satellite ground station here for UHF. Want to use the OMNI VI for the IF, and need to receive 9600 baud using FM. This requires wideband FM reception and the OMNI specs at 15 K; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00189.html (7,770 bytes)
172. [TenTec] FS: Hercules 444 amp (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 06:44:50 -0800 (PST); I had fine success using my 444 with other rigs like my old Kenmore 440 and 940. I believe the 444 wants to see a nice gradual increase in power over some time interval, and some rigs overshoot befor; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-02/msg00305.html (7,831 bytes)
173. [TenTec] OMNI VI on FM (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:32:09 -0800 (PST); I have never put my OMNI VI on FM before today, but decided to try it out (after a couple of years, what the heck...) A few questions for those of you with experience - Do you run the full 100 watts?; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-01/msg00055.html (7,221 bytes)
174. [TenTec] 705 mic (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 07:35:39 -0800 (PST); Yes, I've had both models of 705 mike. The earlier ones required the 9 volt battery and had the battery holder built in to the base. The one I got later for my OMNI VI took its power from the mike co; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00169.html (7,463 bytes)
175. [TenTec] RF Gain and SWR (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 21:54:58 -0800 (PST); Just for the heck of it, I checked my SWR meter on my OMNI VI upgraded to option 3. There is no change in SWR reading at full power via the RF gain control. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00588.html (8,042 bytes)
176. [TenTec] RF Gain and SWR (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:02:09 -0800 (PST); Cool. I went and checked on 40 meters. My OMNI VI, option 3 shows some interaction between RF gain and SWR reading, too. Some other radios are just so predictable...but my radio gives me many interes; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00589.html (8,517 bytes)
177. [TenTec] correction, my OMNI VI SWR/RF gain interaction on 30 meters (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 22:06:06 -0800 (PST); I checked my rig on 30 meters as the previous poster noted. My OMNI VI (one of the first runs, but upgraded) also shows the interaction between RF gain and SWR reading. Yowser. Clark WA3JPG -- FAQ on; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00590.html (7,172 bytes)
178. [TenTec] stupid OMNI tricks (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 08:46:37 -0800 (PST); This is a fun discussion. Just a few more comments. 1. Who cares if the RF gain interacts with the SWR reading? (Well, as long as minimum is still roughly minimum.....for those who actually USE the S; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00609.html (8,346 bytes)
179. [TenTec] Filters interchangeable? (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 14:09:44 -0800 (PST); Hi Nick - The OMNI-C uses 9 MHz IF filters, it is single conversion. The Corsair (I and II) use a single filter in the 9 MHz IF and then, as a dual conversion receiver, have other filters for the 6.3; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00097.html (7,581 bytes)
180. [TenTec] Rig between Scout and OMNI VI (score: 1): Author: csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 19:07:26 -0800 (PST); I recall suggesting the Elecraft K-2 as a receiver between the Scout and the OMNI VI in general quality. I have been too busy to follow up, but here are some interesting numbers, if you like receiver; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00100.html (7,625 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]