Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:darryl@shecora.com: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner WA1GON" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:22:48 -0400
Greetings, I have been playing with contesting for a few years now mainly S&P. One of the questions I have is about "claiming a freq" and calling CQ. The way that I have been doing it is: 1. Find a q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00129.html (8,496 bytes)

2. RE: [CQ-Contest] LotW - Needs More Participation (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner WA1GON" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:00:35 -0400
original Wonder no more! First with banks you have already proven who you are when you opening the account most likely in person. If not then there was some snail mail for signature forms. Just try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00211.html (12,400 bytes)

3. RE: [CQ-Contest] LOTW problems (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:45:06 -0400
Greetings, The password you must enter is the password for the private key of the cert you are signing it with. ie: Your original call sign password, which is the same password that you used to sign
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00299.html (10,513 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:03:50 -0400
Hi, I don't speak for the ARRL, but my guess is that if you send in a signed cert request signed with your current cert, that will do the the trick. Be sure to confine the valid dates to the time tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00300.html (11,173 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:44:57 -0400
Ah, that won't work unless you also send them the private key. Which I think is a very bad idea. I think it would be better to send a CD with the signed log to a friend or someone else willing to up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00302.html (10,617 bytes)

6. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:29:52 -0400
Greetings, This would only make sense if you could upload your contest logs as signed tQSL. The LoTW database must only have authenticated tQSLs in it. Otherwise they would be meaningless. It is impo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00309.html (12,407 bytes)

7. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:37:44 -0400
Bob, You got it more than right. A signed log has the certified in it. A certified has the public key for both the signer and the CA public (which in this case is ARRL). Therefore all you need to se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00310.html (10,864 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:51:35 -0400
Greetings Dick and the group, This is a interesting idea. Is there any policy reason why the call sign owner and a TrustedQSL manager couldn't each have a cert for the same call sign? This would allo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00316.html (11,278 bytes)

9. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Fee Schedule just released !!! (Long) (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:13:35 -0400
Greeting Bob and the group, Huh? I am speaking strictly for myself. If I wasn't I would not have pointed out that TrustedQSL can work outside of LoTW and outside of ARRL. I was selected to lead the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00360.html (13,490 bytes)

10. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW and security (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:57:15 -0400
If ARRL used their own membership files then you could by a cert for the cost of a membership. I have seen the fake paper cards and the length the DX went to fake them. That is one of the reasons th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00366.html (9,283 bytes)

11. RE: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Fee Schedule just released !!! (score: 1)
Author: "Darryl Wagoner" <darryl@shecora.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:41:04 -0400
What proprietary nature? TrustedQSL is open source with a free public license. The use open standards for certs. Anyone can compete with them on even ground. They can even compete with them using AR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00006.html (8,433 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] E-QSLs (score: 1)
Author: darryl@shecora.com (Darryl Wagoner)
Date: Mon May 7 00:16:34 2001
Jim and the group, This is where I have to disagree, digital signatures CAN NOT be forged. While I understand your concern because of your personal experience with your debit card, but I can ensure y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00083.html (10,488 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] E-QSLs (score: 1)
Author: darryl@shecora.com (Darryl Wagoner)
Date: Mon May 7 08:30:40 2001
Gerald, enjoy .. Connectivity is a very important point. This is one of the reasons that a web only eqsl system without digital signatures is lame. If each QSO is signed with a digital signature, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00087.html (8,097 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu