Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave@nk7z.net: 912 ]

Total 912 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [RFI] Broadband RFI... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:56:58 -0700
You are most welcome Jim, I would be interested in your thoughts on BW mode as it relates to bringing things out of the mud in the display.  I was floored what color was hiding the first time I put t
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00010.html (9,871 bytes)

342. Re: [RFI] Broadband RFI... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:59:26 -0700
I would very much like the model number and maker of this device...  I have a web page of devices people say work...  I can add it to that page. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00012.html (8,169 bytes)

343. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:16:00 -0700
My assumption is the ARRL is all over this...  Ed?  If so, how can we help? -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net ___________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00052.html (7,927 bytes)

344. Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:17:00 -0700
I will continue to assume the ARRL is actively involved.  I can't imagine them missing this opportunity. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net ______
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00055.html (9,018 bytes)

345. Re: [RFI] Light fixtures (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:13:10 -0700
I suspect this would be a futile effort in the long run...  Why? Given that most companies are always looking for a better price on all subassembly's-- like power supplies, what is clean today, could
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00076.html (7,936 bytes)

346. Re: [RFI] Yet another balun question (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:17:48 -0700
The choke uses the capacitance between the wires as part of how it functions, so in this case, adding turns will actually break the choke.  Stick to the designed number of turns and it will work well
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00077.html (8,479 bytes)

347. Re: [RFI] Light fixtures (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:59:17 -0700
I never even thought about that...  I have a light I put up with in the Laundry Room, it is LED, noisy, (S9), and about 30 feet from one antenna, and maybe 100 feet from the other...   I only hear it
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00092.html (8,104 bytes)

348. Re: [RFI] Wot the heck!?!?!?!?!?! 40 meters, (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:39:01 -0700
I like that!!!  :)  You are a clever man! -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00096.html (8,806 bytes)

349. Re: [RFI] Wot the heck!?!?!?!?!?! 40 meters, (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 06:45:41 -0700
Could you expand a bit on what the "red-flag" precess is, and how the FCC computers are involved? -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net _____________
/archives//html/RFI/2016-06/msg00099.html (8,481 bytes)

350. Re: [RFI] Light fixtures (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 17:38:15 -0700
That is scary...  Also, thanks for the math, the difference between the two modes is a bit of a surprise to me. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00003.html (7,416 bytes)

351. Re: [RFI] LEDs et al (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 07:05:39 -0700
Hank, I had the same trepidations when Oregon did this...  There is however a bright side to this, (pun intended), in that the price of Pot may crash, and folks will stop growing from the garage, as
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00011.html (14,734 bytes)

352. Re: [RFI] LEDs et al (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 15:53:43 -0700
Thank you Tom, that means a lot coming from you!  I point folks at your site often, and your work has resulted directly in a lower RFI level for me personally, and I am sure others, so tahnk you agai
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00017.html (9,300 bytes)

353. Re: [RFI] LEDs et al (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:07:55 -0700
That would be CIF, not RFI :).  I suspect you need a different filter, (yes, pun intended), for that one! -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net _____
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00018.html (8,822 bytes)

354. Re: [RFI] LEDs et al (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 16:04:45 -0700
Thanks Jim, and you are most welcome!  :) -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00019.html (8,972 bytes)

355. Re: [RFI] TAC Noise Floor Inquiry (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:47:10 -0700
Tom, Is it wise to use your response, and make changes, leaving some of what you already have in place, as my response?  Using your response as a template so to speak. --  73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00023.html (7,483 bytes)

356. [RFI] New RFI source for me... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 07:40:42 -0700
Hi, I have had a new RFI source pop up here in the past few days...  It appears to be on a timer, running at night, but does not sound like a lighting system I am familiar with.  It starts about 8:30
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00053.html (7,661 bytes)

357. Re: [RFI] New RFI source for me... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 09:07:32 -0700
I took a few captures from it, after I sent my original, there is a definite digital sound to it...  I can hear what sounds like data in it. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware rev
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00057.html (8,047 bytes)

358. Re: [RFI] New RFI source for me... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 09:18:26 -0700
Hi Frank, I will be doing exactly as you described as soon as my part arrives from Tarheel, the low band antenna for the truck is dead at the moment...I am just trying to get a feel for it is all and
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00058.html (10,528 bytes)

359. Re: [RFI] New RFI source for me... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:54:59 -0700
Hello again Mike, Thank you for the info.  I think I was unclear in my description-- the device in addition to pulsing on and off over a few seconds, also comes on and goes off at the same time each
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00063.html (8,735 bytes)

360. Re: [RFI] New RFI source for me... (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:00:52 -0700
It sounds like the Vector Gun would be simpler to transport than an Alex Loop.  The Alex Loop is just a 1 meter loop, not so small as the vector gun, and no adjustable amp. I think you have convinced
/archives//html/RFI/2016-07/msg00064.html (9,843 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu