Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave.wilburn@verizon.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Triple Play Award (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:47:02 -0400
http://www.hb9bza.net/lotw/ David Wilburn K4DGW _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00217.html (13,166 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Triple Play Award (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:50:52 -0400
Too cool, I'm already pretty close to this! I do enjoy LOTW. My situation isn't conducive to QSL'ing the good old fashioned way. Every time I log onto LOTW, it is enteresting to see what new QSL's ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00218.html (10,759 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Triple Play Award (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:58:03 -0400
There are a lot of LOTW users, in the US as well as DX, who show up as users, but haven't uploaded logs in a long time. I often work DX, and see that they are a LOTW user, and see them in my log 3 or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00221.html (12,165 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] K2 Repair? (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 08:52:54 -0400
http://w3fpr.qrpradio.com/index.htm David Wilburn K4DGW www.k4dgw.com www.k4rc.net Williamsburg Area Amateur Radio Club (K4RC) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00026.html (7,918 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:29:24 -0400
From the east coast with wire antennas, I was impressed with working Alaska, Hawaii, and Japan on voice. Must be much more common for other folks. There were close to 100 J stations on the cluster Sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00251.html (14,221 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 10 minutes M/S rule (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:45:30 -0400
I'm new to contesting, can someone help me understand the point of a 10 minute rule? I don't quite see why it makes a difference if a station that has multiple operators, but only one transmitter can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00290.html (10,827 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS exchange & lazy folks (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 20:19:11 -0500
I'm one of the guilty. Only my second time doing SS. I "assumed" N1MM put it in, when I setup the exchange. This is my first time using N1MM in SS. Did not realize until very late that it was not. Ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00028.html (9,148 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rising IQ This Year (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:11:48 -0500
I believe some of the responsibility has to lay with the operator (driver) of the pile-up. I have heard generally orderly pile-ups get out of hand quickly when an operator allows it. In some cases, i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00163.html (20,173 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] 2007 Stew Perry Plaque (Rookie) (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:55:02 -0500
Wanted to say thanks to the Boring Amateur Radio Club, and AE6RF for the nice plaque. I jumped into the Stew Perry contest last year, it was my first 160m contest, and only about my 3rd on CW. The ex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00408.html (7,709 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:19:39 -0500
Ok, I get it, no points for working a US station in ARRL DX. As well as DX, I was also interested in picking up states for Triple Play, since lots of states get spotted in this contest. Both the stat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00341.html (7,772 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:46:29 -0500
Some interesting points. Always good to see things from another point of view. C is intriguing, as I thought in contesting we were putting our interest (getting points) ahead of others. As it is, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00351.html (11,940 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] No US DX Only - ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:48:03 -0500
I agree with you 100%. Also seemed to be an awful lot of key clicks. Dave Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00353.html (11,397 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do Keycaps Still Exist? (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:38:06 -0400
http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus/ Takes it to the next level Or not at all....not really what you are looking for, but entertaining none the less. <http://www.daskeyboard.com/slideshow/in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00183.html (8,548 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Do Keycaps Still Exist? (score: 1)
Author: David Wilburn <dave.wilburn@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:39:16 -0400
And..... http://elitekeyboards.com/products.php?pid=fkb10487 Dave Wilburn NM4M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00184.html (7,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu