Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:david@levinecentral.com: 101 ]

Total 101 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Submitting the 3830 form for CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:46:58 -0400
I'm new to contesting and had a blast this past weekend in the CQ WW RTTY contest. I want to make sure I enter the info correct in the 3830 form so I have a pretty basic question. I used N1MM and it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00311.html (7,307 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:26:21 -0500
Not sure, but not during this contest but a RTTY contest within the last month, someone sent me a report of 577 so I put that in as the the report. As for repeating the call in the report, it does se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00262.html (9,148 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:13:31 -0500
Forget the rules - no one is disputing what the rules say. It's plain as the nose on our faces. I haven't seen one person challenge the rules are not explicit. Cabrillo is the accepted format that in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00275.html (14,281 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 07:01:21 -0500
Paul, I and others here seem to agree with you. Yes it's the rule and we all need to comply with the rules at the time. As you noted, no one seems to be disputing that. Folks that think it is redunda
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00286.html (13,389 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:23:40 -0500
-- No Ron, I didn't say that at all. First I said no one is disputing the rules are the rules. Where you and some others made the leap from a discussion on the topic to assuming we feel empowered we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00315.html (15,560 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:37:00 -0500
As a newer contester, I'm really amazed at how anyone can get satisfaction from doing well when they cheat. Is there money (sponsorship) involved that I'm not aware of? Any monetary windfall from doi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00143.html (13,104 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] US Zipcode Help Needed (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 07:08:28 -0500
Tim, Check out http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown_zip.jsp which is the US Post Office Zip Code lookup site. I have lookup by zip code selected but there are other searches available. As you indicated
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00156.html (10,345 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contester e-mail addresses? (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:53:42 -0500
QRZ does show the email address if provided by the operator. You'd see it right above the green link to Click for more detail. NS9I doesn't have his email listed but he lists that he is also an admin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00244.html (8,477 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW/SSB (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:40:51 -0500
If I go to http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/contests/scores.html?con_id=152 it shows: 2008 ARRL International DX Contest (CW) Entries 1 to 25 of 2684 listed So I would guess it is 2684 entries for C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00308.html (8,301 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] Newbie CW logging questions (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 06:49:20 -0500
I am participating (very limited) in my first CW contest this weekend. I have a couple questions on logging for the ARRL DX contest. Maybe it's as simple as "whatever they send is exactly what I log"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00329.html (7,507 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Call Area Question for Awards (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:08:50 -0500
As every topic that comes up here, I'm sure this has been previously discussed, but it seems near impossible to search the archives. I'm a newer contester that is just getting started, so go easy on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00396.html (9,298 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW Percentage (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:53:18 -0500
Before I throw out my stats, a bit of explanation might help. I'm a newer ham who has been on HF less then 1 year. Over this past summer I started contesting and specifically RTTY contesting. So I ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00417.html (9,345 bytes)

13. [RTTY] NAQP RTTY Online Log Submission Broken? (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 07:09:57 -0500
Is it me or is the online log submission of yesterday's contest broken? Referencing the contest rules page at http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php?page=3 I go to the online log submission at http://ww
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00000.html (7,029 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:16:33 -0500
Maybe comparing this to other hobbies/sports would help. My daughter does competitive cheerleading and there are many divisions. You can of course win your division (eg: Jr Coed Level 5). Then like d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00018.html (12,395 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:58:42 -0500
Richard, It really depends how the awards are distributed. Lets say for ease of discussion, there's a certificate for each state winner and a plaque for country, continent and world winners. That mea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00067.html (12,509 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Plaques - Who should win them? (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:59:00 -0500
The plaques are sponsored and paid for by others. It isn't like a stack of QSL cards and pulling the next one off the pile as you described. If the sponsors of the plaques only want them to go to the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00082.html (15,663 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX OffTimes (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:21:39 -0400
I'm with you Dave. Seems the discussion is looking at it from the wrong angle. It says you are allowed to operate 36 hours of the 48 hours the contest runs. If I wait 12 hours from the start of the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00325.html (10,134 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX FAQ - Single op off times (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:33:19 -0400
How about having a discussion WITHOUT using the words "off time"? Single ops are allowed to operate up to 36 hours. Operating time is counted from the first logged QSO until the last logged QSO. Any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00352.html (16,430 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX rules from the past (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:46:57 -0400
Of course the answer is yes. How could it be anything else? You are allowed to operate 36 hours. The only way it is no is if you start at 1130z on Sunday in which case you can operate for 36 straight
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00360.html (8,698 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX OffTimes (score: 1)
Author: "David Levine" <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:32:59 -0400
Rex, Maybe you responded before reading some follow-up posts, but stop worry about "OFF time" and count your operating time. Operating time is 36 hours from when you start unless you don't log a cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00368.html (8,945 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu