Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:df3kv@t-online.de: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking down cheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:27:12 +0100
I wonder what sense the information on the type and length of coax makes when the limit the transmitter power is. ASL ist another nonsense. 73 Peter, DJ7WW --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00091.html (8,517 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:33:42 +0100
No Harry, If that 10m high dipole is located on a 100m high hill above flat environment at 20m ASL with good ground conductivity that dipole will always outperform the dipol at 2000m ASL, especially
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00102.html (9,630 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking downcheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:40:35 +0100
I donīt see the difference to a qro station running an Emtron DX-4 or OM-3500 at full output. And how will you know before the contest started what stations should be tracked as you describe? Most of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00104.html (10,531 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest crackingdowncheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:05:42 +0100
I never missed one. A much better rule extension would be to oblige the Russian stations to use English language only. I tried to participate 3 years ago, started on 160m and gave up after 30 minutes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00137.html (10,805 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] Congrats to Russian DX Contest cracking down (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:14:49 +0100
I fully agree. I gain 10db on low elevation angles by sloping foreground into the most populated durections. 73 Peter A few comments on this topic: - I consider myself a potential top 3 low power con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00155.html (9,804 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:28:22 +0200
Please let us know in which of those mentioned closely regulated competitive activities are not lots of money involved. We are still amateurs and donīt get money for a win. 73 Peter, DJ7WW Most compe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00095.html (9,725 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:10:05 +0200
That is imho a very reasonable rule. Consider a large M/M station with plenty of operators and multiple transceivers on a single band blocking many frequencies for others with their alternate cq. The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00142.html (9,790 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:51:05 +0200
I donīt agree I donīt find the rule that tape logging is not allowed. Where do I find that rule about transcriptions? No rule prohibits tape logging. The logging was done during the contest. I am jus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00292.html (8,467 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 12:49:30 +0200
But how can that be valid qsos without signing the call? 73 Peter, DJ7WW 3) Your "not liking" the DX station not ID-ing every QSO is nothing more than a well-known allegory of "a driver and a pedestr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00051.html (8,426 bytes)

110. [CQ-Contest] FW: Great job of spotting network (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:47:51 +0200
Yuri, I know and I listened to many of those DXpeditions and most of their qsos were not valid either in my opinion. There was a German station in Africa who never signed with a large pileup which I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00057.html (7,674 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Whata contesting "fun" nowadays (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 17:55:03 +0200
But the majority of the callers are probably the cluster operators, not the contest operators 73 Peter, DJ7WW The vast majorities of intrans in the CQWW are UNASS-isted. This means that all of those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00351.html (10,330 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut numbers (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 03:04:04 +0100
And you could call cq as EIEDI, as it is known in advance that a call contains a number. 73 Peter, DJ7WW The CQWW exchange is known in advance for many zones, including zone 15. There was no need to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00232.html (8,241 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2012 10m Contest Activity from DC (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 04:58:14 +0100
What about the other districts? Would be nice to work 435 multipliers in ARRL contests.. ;-)) 73 Peter, DJ7WW For the past umpteenth years, I've tried to persuade the managers of those contests that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-12/msg00112.html (8,211 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu