Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:df3kv@t-online.de: 179 ]

Total 179 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna ground loss (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 18:40:38 +0100
--Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richards Sent: Samstag, 6. Dezember 2008 05:11 To: Peter Voelpel Cc: towertalk@conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00137.html (14,159 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna ground loss (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:04:15 +0100
Peter, I hope you didn't fall into the trap of just comparing the optimum take-off angles. It's quite possible for a dipole with a higher take-off angle to be better than a vertical with a low take-o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00139.html (12,527 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna ground loss (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 00:23:58 +0100
Peter, "In all cases the dipole radiated at a slightly higher angle than the vertical, which is why the vertical is a better choice, sometimes, than the dipole for low band DXing." Steve G3TXQ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00144.html (11,080 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Shunt Fed Question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 01:26:42 +0100
--Original Message-- From: topband-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tree Sent: Sonntag, 7. Dezember 2008 20:57 To: Brian Sarkisian, KG8CO Cc: topband@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00191.html (8,698 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: Shunt Fed Question (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:21:15 +0100
--Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Peter Forbes Sent: Montag, 8. Dezember 2008 04:05 To: Peter Voelpel Cc: towertalk@co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00197.html (8,614 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical antenna ground loss (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:12:42 +0100
horizontally a quarter wave above ground - and a quarter wave MONOPOLE (vertical), >ground mounted... Now, the dipole has that wonderful 4dB of reflection gain (or whatever your favorite fantasy dB n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00319.html (8,026 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] NOT ALL PLASTICS ARE GOOD INSULATORS - TALE OF ABEVERAGE PROBLEM (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:59:41 +0100
The moral of the story is "use red boxes instead of black to house matching and reflection transformers for beverage antennas";-). While the odds of a plastic box being conductive are fairly small, o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00358.html (9,089 bytes)

108. Re: [TowerTalk] Ew: PL-259s Going Open? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:01:14 +0100
As a bit of additional info, I haven't direct-buried any 9913: i's all in conduit. That said, there's no guarantee that the conduit has remained perfectly dry. That said, I have seen no evidence what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00550.html (10,105 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] Best way of getting a line over a tree (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:10:40 +0100
Hello, I know this is an age old question. What is your best recommendation on getting some ropes in the tops of my 80 - 100 FT (25 - 33 M) pine trees ? I have heard a sling shot or bow and arrow can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00599.html (10,786 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-m. 4-Square vs. 40-m. Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:31:59 +0100
--Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom Haavisto Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2009 13:06 To: RLVZ@aol.com Cc: towertalk@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00004.html (9,508 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] mast stacking calculation (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:16:25 +0100
for an antenna, or more than 2 antennas in the same mast. name to search for it.? You are referring to the MARC (Mast, Antenna and Rotator Calculator) Program available from Champion Radio Products.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00300.html (8,075 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] mast stacking calculation (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:03:20 +0100
Program available from Champion Radio Products. It's $10 and can be emailed to you. Steve K7LXC _www.championradio.com_ (http://www.championradio.com) Cell: 206-890-4188 Since I don't know what si-un
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00307.html (9,183 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] Wire Antenna Suggestions Wanted (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:49:04 +0100
--Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stein Roar Brobakken LA6FJA-K3RAG Sent: Dienstag, 3. März 2009 21:02 To: RICHARD SOL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00073.html (8,823 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical vs Beam (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 02:19:40 +0200
I used a half wave vertical on 40m above 130 radials 15-30m long. This vertical was tested for half a year against a straight dipol at 30m. There was not any path where the vertical came near the per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00078.html (12,915 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC- needs improvement (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:10:28 +0200
Sure it does, at about -3,8dbi of gain. Above all other ground except above saltwater the dipol will outperform the vertical in its broadside direction 73 Peter Paul, I'm sorry I've failed to convinc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00151.html (11,421 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole gain figures (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:25:17 +0200
The gain will be the same, there is no reason for being different 73 Peter What is the gain of the cage dipole at its 2:1 VSWR points over a single wire or element dipole at the same frequency points
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00479.html (7,899 bytes)

117. Re: [TowerTalk] RG11 75ohm and 4 square 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:44:39 +0200
I did a different approach when I installed my 40m 4-Square. I first calculated the radiator length for 6090kHz (100kHz below my target frequency). Then I resonated the first radiator by fine tuning
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00609.html (8,767 bytes)

118. Re: [TowerTalk] RG11 75ohm and 4 square 80m (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:36:33 +0200
Oh, I am terribly sorry, that should be read 6990kHz 73 Peter frequency). Why was your target freq = 6190? -Rex  K1HI        Rex Lint       Merrimack, NH --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00630.html (10,534 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] Tennadyne (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 04:57:39 +0200
The gain specs are wish figures. A logperiodic equals in gain a 2-element yagi but differ from the lowest to the highest frequency when there are many elements on a long boom. Being a bit better then
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00173.html (8,762 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor for Long Cable Run (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 01:10:28 +0200
Hi Jim, You could probably use any rotator with DC motor. I use a Prosistel PST2051 with a 600 ft. cable run. The connection to the transformer in the control box just needs to get rerouted to a high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00224.html (9,296 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu