Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:df3kv@t-online.de: 179 ]

Total 179 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights aluminum tower (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:28:32 +0200
Adding guys to a self supporting tower generally raises the allowable wind load and donīt make it fail. If the force of wind blows across guys would be transferred as downward force through the tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00328.html (8,333 bytes)

142. Re: [TowerTalk] Phasing 20 M Vertical help... (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 16:49:21 +0200
If the two verticals are separated a quarter wave length apart you will feed them in phase for broadside. For endfire you need to insert a 90-105° phasing line into one feed line. I did that on 80m a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00462.html (8,012 bytes)

143. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:03:13 +0200
Yes, I have a three stack of 5L KLM yagis. The lower two are hard wired phased and fixed direction U.S. If I add the highest yagi to the stack I almost always get 10db higher differences reported fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00513.html (8,039 bytes)

144. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:27:02 +0200
Hi Dan, Yes, itīs all dependend on the skip angle and the nulls. The addition of the highest antenna resembles an amp at the very low angles only. I use 13m spacing and EZNEC predicts the following o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00517.html (10,840 bytes)

145. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:49:04 +0200
Hi Clay, Exactly! My answer to Dan overlapped with yours 73 Peter When comparing antennas, you can't just look at the maximum gain, you also have to consider take-off angle. When you add the highest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00519.html (11,547 bytes)

146. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Rotor Speed (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 20:10:38 +0200
I found 40 seconds for one rotation real nice for contesting after I built my own rotator. I turned a christmas tree of 5 element yagis 20-10m + 3L FS on 40m without problems, but the stress on the d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00075.html (9,443 bytes)

147. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Rotor Speed (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 14:58:44 +0200
Hi Jim, My drive motors usually are 3-phase 400V, so I have no problem to use automated ramping with a cycle inverter now. But first I need to add an additional position indicator to supply informati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00108.html (10,598 bytes)

148. Re: [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:39:51 +0200
The better is the enemy of the good. Think about it... Rick, You must have a bad hair day!! If I get great reports and I'm happy with my antenna, are you telling me I shouldn't be? Think about it...
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00375.html (11,323 bytes)

149. Re: [TowerTalk] Min spacing to 80m yagi ? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 04:32:45 +0200
I donīt think so. And 3.5MHz x 3 = 10.5MHz. 73 Peter, DJ7WW The harmonic relationship between 40 & 15 has always been a problem if the antennas are too close. The ratio between 40/15 (7mhz X 3 = 21mh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00046.html (8,372 bytes)

150. Re: [TowerTalk] Resonant boom (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:59:53 +0200
Yes, that should work. You could also detune the boom by connecting a capacitor across part of the boom. I built a new 40m FS yagi (12m boom) at 38m, about 50m apart is my shorty-forty at 18m height.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-10/msg00294.html (11,003 bytes)

151. Re: [TowerTalk] myth about engineers? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 11:31:21 +0100
You must have been a lucky man not to carry the tower with the multiple beams ;-)) 73 Peter, DJ7WW I actually participated in carrying a 70 foot tower with multiple beams from one location to another
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00205.html (7,921 bytes)

152. Re: [TowerTalk] STACKED 40 METER BEAMS MATCH (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:38:38 +0100
I donīt agree. The stack match is a more complicated and expensive way to do the matching. The easiest, less expensivest and imho best methode is series matching. http://www.seed-solutions.com/gregor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00332.html (8,443 bytes)

153. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radial (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 23:16:00 +0200
Hi Tom, If you put a vertical with just one elevated radial on your rotator it is nothing more then a bend dipol. A dipol in theory might have 3db gain against a quarter wave as you doubled the numbe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00166.html (10,116 bytes)

154. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 16:50:07 +0200
All sucessful antenna developments are done by EZNEC or similar NEC based software nowadays, I also use it extensively and the results always do work as expected from the beginning when converted int
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00187.html (7,734 bytes)

155. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical with 1 radia (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:49:33 +0200
You will not need just the equipment and the test range, the adjustable distant tower or building to reach into the center of main lobe is important as well, especially for measurements on horizontal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00283.html (11,493 bytes)

156. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:29:39 +0200
Many contest and VHF stations do that. Long boom yagis need a lot of turning radius and spacing. I am going to built one for 10m if the band improves. 5/8 wave length stacking distance is imho the mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00134.html (8,248 bytes)

157. Re: [TowerTalk] H frame for 10 or 15m (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:38:09 +0200
My modelling for the planned 4x104CA stack is done by EZNEC and HFTA. I did not write that the vertical stack of 4 yagis cannot provide a desired 10° vertical lobe. Of course it can by proper combina
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00152.html (13,720 bytes)

158. Re: [TowerTalk] Bose A20 aviation headset for ham purposes? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 05:23:41 +0200
If you donīt need active noise cancellation I like to suggest the Sennheiser HMD46 which I use. http://www.sennheiser-aviation.com/air-traffic-control_500466 As I am wearing glasses and having a rela
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-09/msg00435.html (10,359 bytes)

159. Re: [TowerTalk] Bose A20 aviation headset for ham purposes? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:10:42 +0200
Hi Tonno, Check the technical data page of the HMD 46-3-6. The mic capsule is a dynamic one with a 200 ohms transducer. I use it on all my radios, Icom transceivers IC-751A, 765, IC-740 and Flex SDR-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00000.html (9,143 bytes)

160. Re: [TowerTalk] Bose A20 aviation headset for ham purposes? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:58:14 +0200
Hi Tonno, All HME version are electret, you have to look up the HMD 46-3-6. http://www.sennheiser-aviation.com/air-traffic-control_500466 73 Peter That is strange, I just checked the page: http://www
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00001.html (11,148 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu