Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Comparison Orion vs TS850 ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 21:57:37 +0100
Hello, I actually think about replacing one of my two TS850s by an Orion. Unfortunately, I had no chance to find an ORION owner here in the southwestern corner of Germany, resulting in no possiblity
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00789.html (8,625 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Re TS850-ORION; and some more thougts about the current discussions.. (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:17:18 +0100
Hello, first of all thank you to everybody who sent me answers to my question concerning a possible comparison between the TS850 and the ORION. Meanwhile, I've also been reading older discussions fro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01031.html (9,215 bytes)

3. [TenTec] TT Orion: Also SEMI-BK-IN possible ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 22:39:21 +0100
Hello, a lot of words have been exchanged for the QSK/PTT theme - for me, just another problem concerning QSK operation is important right now while planning my station upgrade: If I purchase the ORI
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01137.html (8,841 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TT Orion: Also SEMI-BK-IN possible ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 00:17:18 +0100
Many thanks to Carl N4PY, Jack AK7O and Duane N9DG for the comments. Of course I agree with Jack that on HF, QSK is an abolute must for reliable operation. It has nothing to do with PTT: Be sure, I'l
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01151.html (10,727 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] ORION headphone clicks - the fix! (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:35:29 +0100
Hello, Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy> wrote: On a noisy band with the clicks in evidence I've had a lot of success in reducing the clicks and sometimes removing them completely by increasing AGC
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01242.html (9,315 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Error in Ten-Tec Orion (565) Review? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:17:24 +0100
It's exaclty what you need for safe QSK operations. As far as I understood, the ORION has a fixed CW delay of 20 ms. Those 20ms are intended to prevent amplifiers from hot switching (as long as their
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00001.html (8,080 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Hi Cut / Lo Cut - Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 01:02:17 +0100
Hello, just one simple comment about this thematic: I'm used to use High Cut / Low Cut on my TS850S - and comparing this with PBT I've seen on other transceivers (with fixed BW), I really wouldn't li
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00167.html (9,569 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Hi Cut / Lo Cut - Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 01:56:55 +0100
Hello, Sinisa, you are absolutely right. Me too, in CW, I normally use RIT - but sometimes also Cutting, but that's only due to the fact that I've only a 500 Hz filter in my TS850 - not sufficient at
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00173.html (10,183 bytes)

9. [TenTec] Model 963 PS and EMC ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:27:10 +0100
Hello, today I ordered my ORION from our (new) german TenTec distributor. As I got some EMC problems with my switched PS from Diamond while transmitting more than abt. 400W on 40m, I wonder if someon
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00491.html (7,058 bytes)

10. [TenTec] ORION and USB/COM adapter ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:07:27 +0100
Hello, as I'll own an ORION soon, I have to think about integrating it into my shack.. Well... and that's the problem: as many others, my PC has only one serial port, which is already in use for PR.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00599.html (7,738 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] ORION and USB/COM adapter ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:51:48 +0100
Hello, thank you for the big amount of answers I got on my question concerning USB/COM adapters and ORION. ... I think I'll just try it out with USB adapters, and if it doesn't work, I'll insert addi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00665.html (8,482 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] guide to adjusting Orion receiver;filters and performance (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:34:46 +0100
Hello, at least in some cases I can confirm Sinisa's observations. A sufficiently high AGC threshold (probably in combination with some hang time) improved readability at least on some signals, f.ex.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00069.html (9,762 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Transverter Key T/R hang time ? (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 23:32:08 +0100
Hello, I just connected my VHF system, consisting of a Transverter and amplifier, to my ORION. My problem actually is the PTT line (key output) during CW transmission. While I can set a T/R hang time
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00145.html (7,501 bytes)

14. [Orion] ORION Synthesizer problem at 18 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:58:29 +0200
Hello, I found a severe problem with my ORION on 17m yesterday evening. Instead of being tuned to the displayed frequency, the synthesizer for VFO A often locks around 560-580 kHz higher (measured wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00847.html (9,608 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] ORION Synthesizer problem at 18 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:49:29 +0200
Hello John, thank you for the additional informations & hints. Well, I only forgot to mention the RAM clear in my message. I of course tried this, too. Obviously, the problem is a hardware problem wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00889.html (12,867 bytes)

16. Re: AW: [TenTec] Question for Contesters: (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 20:43:58 +0200
Hello, sorry, but I completely disagree with you, Sinisa. First, there is no higher-magnitude error than a bad transmit signal. Every other error is only harmull to the operator itself, a FT1000X can
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00208.html (14,969 bytes)

17. [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Transverters and Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 21:34:10 +0100
Hello, I've never seen this output power control problem. With my ORION, I easily can control the transverter output power from nothing til max with the front panel control. It works excellent. I use
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00061.html (9,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu