Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dick.green@VALLEY.NET: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Two radios - one amp (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Jan 16 03:41:18 2001
Terry, Dave, K8CC, is correct. Despite very fast retuning (usually about a second), the 87A cannot retune fast enough to serve as a shared amp in an SO2R system. Although there are some indications t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00082.html (8,988 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] 87A question (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Mon Jan 22 01:01:58 2001
Interesting question. I've seen numerous claims by Alpha that the dit will be transmitted at low power -- i.e., the amp is bypassed during band switching. My guess is that it takes less than a milli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00101.html (7,983 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] 87A question (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Jan 23 04:15:54 2001
Using my SO2R station, I tested the 87A band switching by transmitting with one rig (FT-1000D/87A) and listening on the other (FT-1000MP). Here's what I found: 1. When using a single dit or dah to ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00116.html (9,845 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Click, click, click... (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri Feb 23 03:07:30 2001
I think it's more likely that the MP receiver can't handle lots of strong signals in the wide passband of the early stages. This could be true of other "state-of-the-art" radios, too. Up until this w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00153.html (9,550 bytes)

25. [CQ-Contest] Re: Clicks (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun Mar 11 14:02:33 2001
I note that my call is not in the list of click offenders. I was running EU on 10M for many hours at the same time as the others, and the chances are that I was about as loud. I wonder if I'm in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00185.html (7,187 bytes)

26. [CQ-Contest] Clicks: 1000D and 1000MP waveforms (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun Mar 11 14:02:31 2001
I just took a look at the keying waveforms on my 1000D (new) and 1000MP (< 2yrs old). Here are the results for 38WPM, 50W output, VOX and QSK: 1000D VOX 1000D QSK 1000MP VOX 1000MP QSK total waveform
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00186.html (8,403 bytes)

27. [CQ-Contest] Does Dayton hurt the WPX CW Contest? (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Thu Apr 19 12:46:16 2001
Allow me to lend my voice to those requesting that CQ WPX CW be moved from Memorial Day weekend. This is one of my favorite contests, and I make every effort to operate, but must pay a heavy price ev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-04/msg00141.html (10,048 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] Band reject filters (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Mar 21 00:24:00 2000
I use an automatically switched set of stubs for my SO2R station for both CW and SSB contests. I cut the stubs for CW and that's where they seem to be the most effective. That's because the bandwidt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00261.html (9,259 bytes)

29. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category? (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Fri Jun 2 01:46:07 2000
Just about everything I would have said against making SO2R a new category has been said here, except for one thing: SO2R has made contesting more fun for me and so I participate more. Do you really
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00053.html (9,328 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Jun 6 01:19:53 2000
If I could make a plea to all the ops out there who use cut numbers: ** Please Don't! ** Thank you & 73, Dick WC1M -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative reques
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00142.html (7,309 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] Re:SO2R (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed Jun 7 02:53:28 2000
No, no, no and no. First, the time advantage isn't as great as you think. I do not use the second radio all the time. I mostly use it when the run rate is low enough (say, under 70/hour) for me to c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00156.html (9,584 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] Re: Aging ranks (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Thu Jun 3 02:08:16 1999
I wouldn't mind fewer holiday weekend conflicts, but let's bear in mind that competitive contesting (as opposed to casual contesting) requires a considerable amount of motivation. If you want a bette
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00055.html (7,961 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] Re: Aging ranks (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Thu Jun 3 02:08:16 1999
I wouldn't mind fewer holiday weekend conflicts, but let's bear in mind that competitive contesting (as opposed to casual contesting) requires a considerable amount of motivation. If you want a bette
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00218.html (7,924 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] UBN relative performance (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Oct 5 20:32:27 1999
So, how can I subscribe to CQ Contest Magazine? The web site is under construction and there's no way to subscribe on the main CQ site. Do I have to go buy a copy of CQ to get a subscription blank?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-10/msg00012.html (7,476 bytes)

35. [CQ-Contest] UBN relative performance (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue Oct 5 20:32:27 1999
So, how can I subscribe to CQ Contest Magazine? The web site is under construction and there's no way to subscribe on the main CQ site. Do I have to go buy a copy of CQ to get a subscription blank?
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-10/msg00014.html (7,409 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules Question (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Thu Oct 14 01:02:20 1999
Forgive this newbie question, but I've never participated in a multi-multi (other than FD) and until recently was not a member of a contest club. I'm planning on doing about a 12-hour shift at a mult
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-10/msg00039.html (8,287 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Which way do we go? (Beam Headings) (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net ("Dick Green".)
Date: Mon Nov 24 09:31:38 1997
I agree with Tom that 60 degrees makes more sense than 45 degrees from the Eastern U.S. I studied this before settling on the orientation of my 40M 4-square. I modified an old BASIC program that comp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00507.html (7,871 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (long) (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Sun Apr 14 17:39:27 2002
During the past couple of years, I've been reluctant to comment on electronic QSL issues because I was working on the LOTW design. I felt that it would be inappropriate to say anything until the desi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00165.html (26,417 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Tue May 21 13:34:29 2002
I'm not a patent lawyer and these comments are my own, not ARRL's (repeat, not ARRL's). My personal opinion is that eqsl.cc and LOTW are fundamentally different: Eqsl.cc is a repository of radio cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00240.html (12,885 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] Restoring High Band/Low Band categories in ARRL DXTest (score: 1)
Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green)
Date: Wed Jun 19 15:41:34 2002
I can see the arguments on both sides of the High Band/Low Band debate, but what's the rationale behind allowing only one single-band entry? The ARRL DX rules make a pretty big deal out of prohibitin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00180.html (14,146 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu