Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] spotted calls veracity (score: 1)
Author: Chuck <discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:59:58 -0800 (PST)
As Steve notes.. the Cluster spots ONLY provide you with information that SOMETHING you need has been spotted. No guarantee it's accurate, heard by the spotter, or even on the air. It's a 'trigger' t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00057.html (9,846 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: Chuck <discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:44:25 -0800 (PST)
I had illegal invaders on 10M. I just QSY'd to Zero Beat their AM carrier and called CQ! Amazing!! after about 2 -3 minutes they went QRT! And they stayed off until I left! Ahh, the joys of PROACTIVE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00377.html (10,119 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] NS3T's "witch-hunt" (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Fri Apr 19 07:13:04 2002
Ahh, well. Someone failed to READ all of NS3T's comments concerning his intent and purpose for the postings, it seems. I did not read NS3T's comments as flames, attempts to engage in a witch hunt or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00234.html (8,144 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] spotting (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Sat Apr 20 08:42:12 2002
Iassume the message about everyone self spotting and allowing all to do this was in jest. I will take it as such. To cut back on the 'bogus spotting' perhaps a good tack to take would be for the Inte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00259.html (9,217 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] Having the PC do all the work.. (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Thu Apr 25 10:18:23 2002
-- VA3UZ <va3uz@rac.ca> wrote: ..... it will be enough to check our PC ..Or it will be enough to push a BIG ENTER at the start of the contest...(??) This is the future of contesting. de k3ft (tongue
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00382.html (8,737 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] dits and dahs. (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Tue May 14 09:50:43 2002
de k3ft. Tom.. YOU started it! Even Hollywood likes Dahs over Dits. Witness the WW2 movie title.. 'Dahs Boot' (ducking quickly for cover!) 73 Chuck K3FT ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00140.html (8,005 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] Was W7RM immune from the 'Big Spark Gap?' (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Wed May 15 15:24:17 2002
Perhaps it was simply a case that his intense amount of RF being radiated over a period of time simply introduced so many ionized particles into the ether that it effectively cancelled out whatever c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00168.html (8,503 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] "please copy" (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Tue Jun 25 10:03:58 2002
"OK W7ABC 1A Georgia" "2A Washington" "W7ABC Thanks QRZ Field Day K7AW" And take the frequency. Mean, I know. :) K3FT opines.. Mean? NO WAY! It's all part of the game. If another op gives the opening
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00227.html (8,852 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] "Please copy..." (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Wed Jun 26 14:07:29 2002
Scott Nichols sagely noted that.... "I think, for many people, the "please copy" acts as an instinctive "bridge"...." and also noted "..It also seems a little more friendly..." K3FT opined.. What I l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-06/msg00253.html (10,893 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] Club Callsigns (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Wed Jul 3 11:36:27 2002
Hi Ed and others.. One correction... As long as the holder of the Call being used has designated an authorized CONTROL OPERATOR to oversee the operations, the holder of the callsign need not be prese
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00035.html (7,575 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] moving onward (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Tue Jul 23 11:43:20 2002
Greetings! As W3PP wrote... let's get back to contesting and topics surrounding that topic. Getting more people into contesting always reigns high on the list of items discussed. The ARRL has acted,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00347.html (8,238 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] Answers to questions I asked. (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Wed Jul 24 09:08:53 2002
Greetings. I recieved a multitude of replies from over 50% of the Directors in response to my request for answers to my questions. Many were long, detailed, and contained a lot of information on how
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-07/msg00395.html (10,532 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] CW/SSB/PSK31... (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Tue Aug 6 09:42:46 2002
This debate is like others along the same lines.. Both have dedicated camps of followers who have passionate (and usually well-reasoned) points of view and positions staked out. Neither will budge (m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00085.html (9,606 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] What Is a Contact? (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Fri Aug 23 15:47:04 2002
The basic point is this. ** Don't worry if the OTHER station is playing by the FCC rules (assuming that station is under the FCC's jurisdiction) just make sure that YOU are following the rules as bes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-08/msg00242.html (7,567 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] Re: They have no internet, no cabrillo... (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Wed Oct 2 06:40:10 2002
First, let me state that I don't have as great a station as many do, but I have one that works for me. I either operate as part of the M/M world or I do it as a SO. I agree with Vladimir! The key, he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00025.html (9,544 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] message date (score: 1)
Author: discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com (Chuck)
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:43:58 2002
Of course.. if the message was signed by Larsen E. Rapp W1OU then we all should know that our tongues should be pressed quite firmly against the inside of the right cheek. (in the mouth... the mouth!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-10/msg00307.html (8,202 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu