Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dlmarti@kc2lcf.net: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] CATV RFI from 2m SSB (UPDATE) (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:25:32 -0500
<lots of snipage> My experience: I had terrible interference from the CATV system in my area. All across the 2m and 70cm bands. So much so I didn't call about the problem. I just figured with as bad
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00022.html (8,542 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Estate VHF equipment (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:45:49 -0500
A friend of mine is trying to sell some VHF equipment for a widow of a local Ham. Please email him with any questions (I know nothing): ggunzelman@zcloud.net Mirage 6m amp A1015 Mirage 220 amp C1012
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00048.html (7,152 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Biat Tee return loss (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:52:13 -0400
I still don't have it. You mean power reflected across the T or from the T. If it is from the T then wouldn't that be bad? If it is across the T the wouldn't 10 -> 30db be bad also? -- David L. Mart
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00026.html (7,976 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Biat Tee return loss (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:40:02 -0400
Now I understand, thanks. puzzled The higher -- David L. Martin w0snj@arrl.net _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00029.html (9,371 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] GE757 Light Bulb for HD73 (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:47:20 -0400
Just about anywhere online, its call a 757-USA. donsbulbs, digikey, etc. Cross references: 757-USA 031293409362 031293409362-EIKO 26600 35781 619600U-MICROLAMP 6240-00-950-1678 6240-00-950-1727 757
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00030.html (7,404 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest voice keyer - which one (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:26:31 -0400
is not work in If you The MFJ-434 my club had worked well for many years, for the last year or so the sound quality has deteriorated to the point it is unusable. This is probably due to a bad cap. I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00057.html (7,650 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC706MK2G Question (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:47:08 -0400
The '706 mailling lists were a-buzz with this a few months ago. A few people did claim that saw this problem, others claimed it didn't exist. The claim was that even turned down to a lower power, the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00026.html (8,291 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Antenna stacking question (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:21:10 -0400
When you stack antennas you get a gain of a little below 3dB, twice the antenna equals twice the signal. Makes sense. Do stacked antennas with a combined gain equal to a much longer antenna have a wi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00060.html (6,998 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] FW: VHF on FD - ABSOLUTELY (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:21:18 -0400
The DVRA (W2ZQ), will have 6m and 2m from FN20og. Both beams will be around 40ft HAAT (but we are pretty flat for many miles around). We will be running 100W on both bands. Last year we only had 6m a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00078.html (7,232 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Informal FD VHF+ Challenge - An Idea (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:18:01 -0400
Since we only have section, call, and freq we could only base the "score" on just these factors. Section is not really fair, since the size or area of a section is not consistent. I propose: 1 point
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00089.html (8,816 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Informal FD VHF+ Challenge - An Idea (score: 1)
Author: "David L. Martin" <dlmarti@kc2lcf.net>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:10:35 -0400
I understand your point from a contest (ie. competetive) stand point. I was trying to make it more attractive to activate more bands. reward for -- David L. Martin w0snj@arrl.net ____________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00091.html (11,847 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu