Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:don.field@gmail.com: 54 ]

Total 54 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:45:16 +0000
Just a short note to apologise for the late arrival of the 2011 IOTA Contest results, as I am getting quite a few enquiries. Jim MM0BQI and I had completed the bulk of the work by late September, but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-01/msg00009.html (7,569 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] 2011 IOTA Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:57:03 +0000
I am pleased to announce that the final results of the 2011 IOTA Contest now appear on the web at http://www.iotacontest.com/contest/iota/2011/finalScore.php There will soon also be a link via the RS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00084.html (8,810 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Rules for 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:35:12 +0000
The revised rules for the 2012 IOTA Contest now appear on the RSGB Contest Committee website at: http://www.rsgbcc.org/hf/rules/2012/riota.shtml There have a few rule changes this year, following las
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00187.html (8,960 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:03:19 +0100
Further to my recent email, we have had a quick rethink on scoring for contacts with non-island (world) stations, as it quickly became apparent from feedback that we had missed a trick here, for whic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00234.html (8,036 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Update (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:03:28 +0000
Rudy Very strange post. "Illegal" - that's a strong term and quite incorrect. Who's law are we invoking here? Personally, I wish more entrants would do a sanity check before sending their log. And ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00250.html (11,961 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest, deadline reminder (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:49:46 +0000
A reminder that the deadline for logs is this coming weekend. We are still awaiting some quite major logs, so please do ensure you get them to us in time for the deadline or, if you need an extension
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00227.html (7,285 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] IOTA Contest, Provisional Results (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:27:57 +0000
This is just to say that provisional results for the 2012 IOTA Contest were made available last week, and all entrants should have received an email from the robot with a link to the results and to t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-10/msg00151.html (7,791 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] A tuff CW copy (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:10:56 +0000
Most broken call a few years ago in the IOTA contest was YO7HHI Don G3XTT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00585.html (7,875 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:00:22 +0100
I suspect the answer is actually quite mundane. When the 3:1 penalty was first introduced, log checking was still on paper and only a small proportion of errors were actually detected (in any case, w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00215.html (8,796 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Legalities and ethics of international remote operation? (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:48:09 +0000
CEPT has nothing to do with it - for operations under the CEPT agreement, the operator must be in the same country as the transmitter. The difficulty here is that rules for remote operation vary from
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00286.html (9,366 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:37:18 +0100
Just for the record, G3ZHL is a good friend of mine and doesn't operate CW or 160m 73 Don G3XTT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00291.html (20,646 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 20:31:16 +0100
I need to correct my earlier posting regarding my friend G3ZHL - it appears he did take part in CQWW CW, using the CW decoder in his K3. *Don,* *Yes, I was active on 29th and 30th November, but just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00320.html (23,765 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Phone Zone 20? (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:27:19 +0100
I will be in LZ and YO in the week prior to CQWW Phone and just wondering if any team in that part of the world is looking for an extra operator for the contest? Thanks, 73 Don G3XTT ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00218.html (6,622 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting and the FT8 Revolution (score: 1)
Author: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 18:34:28 +0000
With respect Jeff, that's simply not true. From the WSJT site: *The FT4 Protocol for Digital Contesting* * FT4 is an experimental digital mode designed specifically for radiocontesting. Like FT8, it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-07/msg00012.html (17,301 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu