Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:donovanf@starpower.net: 266 ]

Total 266 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TowerTalk] Delta Loop compared to Dipole (actual experience) (Richards) (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:43:21 -0400 (EDT)
Richards, Please share with us how you will decide if your new antenna has met your on-the-air operating goals. Will you use the antenna primarily for working DX? Or will you use it primarily for wor
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00554.html (13,382 bytes)

202. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Comparison Chart (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
I received several inquiries about my old Coaxial Cable Loss Tables. Yes, I've updated the tables several times. My most recent update incorporates more accurate computations from the VK1OD on-line c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00051.html (11,791 bytes)

203. Re: [TowerTalk] Filters for Field Day (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
Hi John, Filters are N O T needed to eliminate interference between multiple Field Day transmitters on the same band. Antenna design, proper choice of polarization, physical separation between antenn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00084.html (10,552 bytes)

204. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Mounted Vertical Question (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:56:10 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Dick, The antenna you've installed is not a base fed, ground mounted quarter wave vertical. Your antenna length is measured from ground level (the bottom of your 5 foot pipe) to the top of the ver
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00272.html (9,485 bytes)

205. [TowerTalk] NSS Tower Demolition Video (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:56:07 -0400 (EDT)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdvpjV1Mb1w _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00302.html (6,466 bytes)

206. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Dogs on Dateline (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:11:58 -0400 (EDT)
If the photograph in the link below is any indicator; we're going to see many, many safety violations on Monday night. Should be good lessons learned about what not to do. This is a good time to prog
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00454.html (8,290 bytes)

207. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m OWA (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
Peter, The boom design for a 40M OWA is highly dependent on local wind and ice loading conditions. All of my Yagis are designed for at least 90 MPH wind with no ice, and at least 50 MPH wind with 3/4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00705.html (8,673 bytes)

208. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: OT: Exterior Ethernet Cable (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
Hans, Not quite true... The most common cause of a change in VSWR measurement when you change the length of a coaxial transmission line is measurement error caused by poor VSWR bridge directionality.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00266.html (8,195 bytes)

209. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
Don't forget that you must comply with the dead weight capacity of your tilt-over tower. This is important, a nearby ham failed to comply with the dead weight specification and his Heights fold-over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00324.html (11,908 bytes)

210. Re: [TowerTalk] Heights Towers Aluminum?? (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:13:34 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Dick, Unlike K3CB's recent experiences with the catastrophic failure ofboth of his Heights crank-up towers (one in dead calm weather and the other in light 30 MPH winds), the collapse of the Heigh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00335.html (10,708 bytes)

211. Re: [TowerTalk] Who is using stacked 3El 80 meter beams around the country and the world? (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:10:46 -0400 (EDT)
The only one I know of is at NO8D: http://www.cq.sk/img/serial_contesting_2.jpg A much bigger one is now being built at NR5M http://www.nr5m.com 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original message -- ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00504.html (8,769 bytes)

212. Re: [TowerTalk] Interactions btwn stacks and other antenna on same tower (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
Scott, Congratulations on the progress you're making on your new antenna system. Adding a KT34-XA only 14 feet below your C-51XR at 52 feet will seriously degrade the performance of both antennas. My
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00157.html (12,621 bytes)

213. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45G (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:05:42 -0400 (EDT)
Jimmy, The hole dimensions for any Rohn 45G or 55G base is 30" x 30" x 48", for normal soil and weather conditions. If in doubt, consult an engineer. See the following drawing, for Rohn base CB2: htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00257.html (8,246 bytes)

214. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) Vertical Antenna Instead of Tower Decision.... (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:22:26 -0400 (EDT)
James, I'd suggest you evaluate a few more alternatives before deciding: 1. Retain your existing antennas until you install something more permanent. Compared to your existing antennas, you'll be dis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00266.html (18,470 bytes)

215. Re: [TowerTalk] M2 customer service (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:27:23 -0400 (EDT)
Jorge, I've never had a problem reaching Jeremy by telephone at 1600Z. He and M2 provide superb customer support. 73 Frank W3LPL -- Original message -- _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00182.html (8,688 bytes)

216. Re: [TowerTalk] ROHN 25G (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:10:27 -0400 (EDT)
D., Thats good information. Could you share with us what the antennas are on each tower? It makes a big difference if its a 2 meter beam or a 40 meter beam or a large tribander. tks 73 Frank W3LPL --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00277.html (12,554 bytes)

217. [TowerTalk] World Record Lego Tower (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:06:04 -0400 (EDT)
It is a tower, right ? http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/10/worlds_highest_lego_tower_construction_on_video.html 73 Frank W3LPL _______________________________________________ __________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00330.html (7,180 bytes)

218. Re: [TowerTalk] K1XX Asynchronous Transformer (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:14:40 -0500 (EST)
John, Here's an on-line asynchronous transformer calculator: http://www.seed-solutions.com/gregordy/Software/SMC.htm 73 Frank w3LPL -- Original message -- ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00099.html (8,265 bytes)

219. Re: [TowerTalk] wrapping a big grip on phillystran (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:55:42 -0500 (EST)
Hi Jerry, I've been using about 20 Parafil guys, including their bullet-style guy terminations, on my AB-105 towers since I acquired them in the UK over 30 years ago. They have been completely troubl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00328.html (13,052 bytes)

220. Re: [TowerTalk] 43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun type, (score: 1)
Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:51:38 -0500 (EST)
Rob, A 43 foot vertical is 5/8 wavelength on 20 meters. With appropriate radial and matching systems it can be an excellent antenna on 80 through 20 meters, and a fairly good antenna on 160 and 17 me
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00500.html (9,370 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu