- 1. [RTTY] Another method for FSK generation (long and rambling) (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Hall" <doug.hall@jps.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:15:33 -0500
- Hi all, For quite some time I've been using MMTTY to ragchew, chase DX, and contest with and it works very well. I used a COM port TXD line to drive a transistor to generate an FSK signal to the FSK
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00035.html (10,007 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] 6 meter RTTY? (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Hall" <doug.hall@jps.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:52:44 -0500
- The A503S does a good job. Like your tribander, my log periodic resonated on 6m as well, but the 3 el Cushcraft was a big improvement in performance - if you're serious about getting on 6m you should
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-03/msg00056.html (9,019 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] LoTW - another view (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Hall" <doug.hall@jps.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:14:27 -0500
- OK, so there are a lot of hams who don't use LoTW. Even some of the ARRL higher-ups don't use it. But nobody has touched on one of the reasons that it's not being used. For some folks it's just plain
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00619.html (8,294 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] thats very sad Gert (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Hall" <doug.hall@jps.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:41:30 -0500
- Do you think 10 GHz has the same importance in the Scheme of Things as LoTW? I don't. LoTW is a biggie, or should be. 10 GHz could vanish and few people would notice or care. -- I'd care. In the Sche
- /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00637.html (9,278 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu