Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:droese@necg.de: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestions for Rotor RS232 control? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:09:42 +0200
Hi Barry, try these ones: http://easy-rotor-control.com/ Have a few of them, all working perfectly (RS-232, USB & Ethernet variants available). And Rene, DF9GR, the owner of ERC, is a great guy to de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00202.html (8,848 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 SSB - date? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 17:44:51 +0200
I suppose they will run in parallel then, Micha. ;-) 73, Olli Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de Am 08.06.2014 08:12, schrieb Michael Höding: Hi, in 2015 february has only 3 full week
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00045.html (8,307 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] W1AW/0 in SD in May (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:15:37 +0200
Hi, anybody knows who was the operator of W1AW/0 in SD on May 15 around 03:30z or managing the whole SD activity? Thanks, Olli -- Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-06/msg00076.html (6,914 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] ONE radio, two operators?? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:18:47 +0100
Why not an Overlay category for "true" M/S like there is for SO Classic? Might be a worthwhile idea without needing to change the rules themselves, impact on records, a.s.o. 73, Olli - DH8BQA Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00270.html (12,725 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] W1AW/KH6 (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:47:01 +0100
Hi guys, is there any OP schedule available for W1AW/KH6? Condx are not very favorable right now for antipodes QSOs. We had an opening towards KH6 on 20 SSB yesterday for just an hour before the band
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00342.html (7,740 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX contest and Low power (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:44:02 +0100
Good question, Bob! Same like why there are no Single Band Unlimited classes ... only SOABU available. And why only 2 power classes for Unlimited while 3 for un-assisted ... a.s.o. Seems we can't hav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00078.html (8,935 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Band Bandpass Filters (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:05:16 +0100
http://www.5b4agn.net/TX%20BPF.htm as well as http://www.om-power.com/om6bpf 73, Olli - DH8BQA Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de Am 19.02.2015 um 22:23 schrieb Jeff Clarke: Looking f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00086.html (8,647 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:37:59 +0100
Give us a seperate category for remote ops. Then Paul will finally be happy and K4VV would have won their category, too. Seems like a WIN-WIN situation for everybody, doesn't it? ;-) 73, Olli - DH8BQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00122.html (11,476 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] The REAL way remotes are used (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:16:43 +0100
Am 27.02.2015 um 15:11 schrieb Charles Harpole: -Immediately, as cited by Glenn, W0GJ, on K1N, somehow-- probably via a remote station that will be loud to K1N--a loud call gets the K1N op's attentio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-02/msg00157.html (8,765 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] Wk HS ssb on 80/160 special freqs (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 18:07:28 +0100
A little off-topic: Isn't that third? Thought it was JA, then W, then HS?! Just curious ... 73, Olli - DH8BQA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-03/msg00024.html (7,251 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] Excessive Bandwidth Rule (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:12:31 +0200
My experience is that the majority of offenders ignore you when you politely inform them in the act. Various experiences here, Barry. UA9MA was 40 kHz wide on 10 m during WPX-SSB. When I told him he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-04/msg00122.html (11,812 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 19:50:56 +0200
Good to see the committee is finally taking actions. But sad to see no one got DQ'ed for having too wide a signal. :-( Obviously reporting them with exact times and frequencies is not enough to check
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00071.html (11,241 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40 Meters SSB (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 23:13:15 +0200
Albert, USA station's should be or at a very transmit frequency. While the idea might be okay I have yet to see one contest software that is writing the transmit frequency into the Cabrillo file. All
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00139.html (8,432 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A. (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 23:34:42 +0200
Ahem, isn't this exactly what we do with SO2R or even SO2V? Your examples below show 8 and 10 minutes between the two 40 m QSOs. Plenty of time to find new mults on the second radio/VFO and stack a f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00184.html (13,852 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A. (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 00:05:31 +0200
It takes long, we all know that, Rich! But how do you know when he *found* them? How is the log telling you that? It only tells you when he *worked* them! Might be he found them already 30 minutes ea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00187.html (14,122 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] Spots // Re: CQ WW CW 2014 Results (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 16:51:32 +0200
band or bad a frequency. Or that you are just a normal G, F, DL, IK, W ... station! ;-) Nobody cares about us ... You can't compare the benefit of being spotted as a seldom Caribbean mult as in your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00213.html (9,385 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015 (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 20:08:46 +0200
sign the log (the QSO part, not the Header) to ensure it is not manually edited afterward. This will need some slight (retro-compatible) modification to the Cabrillo format and collaboration with so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00485.html (8,470 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Proposed Rules (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:26:35 +0200
Am 25.05.2015 um 20:23 schrieb Joe: Not having a radio that tells my logger N1MM my frequencies I guess I'm screwed? Also just for the fun of it. I just made 2 bogus contacts using the logger for nex
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00630.html (8,538 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] Modified Proposed Rule Changes (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:28:48 +0200
Hi Dennis, been a system in place in CQWW that allows an operator to submit a score for the club score that is different than the one submitted for awards purposes. For example, I could submit an ent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00632.html (8,130 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2015 CQ WW Rules Preview (draft 2) (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:32:56 +0200
Seems good to me. I would even have left the recording stuff inside but just have clarified that the CC would request it *before* the contest (like with a visit from an observer). Would only need cla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00633.html (8,834 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu